REVIEW PAPER
Effectiveness of cupping therapy for musculoskeletal pain: an umbrella review
1
Department of Physical Therapy for Basic Sciences, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Ahram Canadian University, Egypt
2
Department of Physical Therapy for Musculoskeletal Disorders and Surgery, Faculty of Physical Therapy, 6th October University, Giza, Egypt
3
Department of Physical Therapy for Surgery, Faculty of Physical Therapy Ahram Canadian University, Giza, Egypt
4
Department of Physical Therapy for Neuromuscular Disorders, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Ahram Canadian University, Egypt
5
Department of Physical Therapy for Pediatrics, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Delta University for Science and Technology, Gamsa, Egypt
6
Department of Basic Sciences, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University, Egypt
Submission date: 2024-04-08
Acceptance date: 2024-10-16
Publication date: 2024-12-23
Corresponding author
Mohamed Magdy ElMeligie
Department of Physical Therapy for Basic Sciences, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Ahram Canadian University, 4th Industrial Zone, Banks Complex, 6th of October City, Giza Governorate, Egypt
Department of Physical Therapy for Basic Sciences, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Ahram Canadian University, 4th Industrial Zone, Banks Complex, 6th of October City, Giza Governorate, Egypt
Hum Mov. 2024;25(4):28-43
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Purpose:
This umbrella review aimed to review and synthesise the findings of published systematic reviews and meta-analyses analysing the effects of cupping therapy programs on musculoskeletal pain in athletes and the general population.
Methods:
A search in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, MEDLINE, Cochrane Central, CINAHL, EMBASE, and PEDro was performed. The methodological quality of the included systematic reviews was evaluated using the 16 domains of the AMSTAR2 checklist. Based on the performance in these 16 domains of different weights, an overall rating was generated, and the quality was determined to be critically low (1–4), low (5–8), moderate (9–12), or high (13–16). The overall confidence in the results of the reviews was low. Among the critical items, all reviews failed to present a list of excluded trials, four reviews did not consider the risk of bias when presenting or discussing their results, three reviews did not use adequate methods for the meta-analysis, the impact of publication bias was not investigated in three reviews, and the absence of a planned protocol to guide the review was noted in two reviews. Most reviews included trials of low quality (i.e., high risk of bias).
Results:
A total of 301 studies involving 27,960 participants were analysed in 21 systematic reviews. The review confirmed that cupping therapy is more effective than passive interventions such as heat therapy, usual care, conventional medications, and no treatment. However, its effectiveness is similar to acupuncture. There is not enough evidence to recommend cupping therapy for athletes, and there are associated risks such as hematoma, pain at the application site, increased pain, tingling sensations, and dizziness.
Conclusions:
Considering the standards, this umbrella review showed that most systematic reviews and meta-analyses using cupping therapy for musculoskeletal pain present low methodological quality. Most of the systematic reviews in this umbrella revealed that cupping therapy is ineffective in improving musculoskeletal pain in the athletic and general populations.
This umbrella review aimed to review and synthesise the findings of published systematic reviews and meta-analyses analysing the effects of cupping therapy programs on musculoskeletal pain in athletes and the general population.
Methods:
A search in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, MEDLINE, Cochrane Central, CINAHL, EMBASE, and PEDro was performed. The methodological quality of the included systematic reviews was evaluated using the 16 domains of the AMSTAR2 checklist. Based on the performance in these 16 domains of different weights, an overall rating was generated, and the quality was determined to be critically low (1–4), low (5–8), moderate (9–12), or high (13–16). The overall confidence in the results of the reviews was low. Among the critical items, all reviews failed to present a list of excluded trials, four reviews did not consider the risk of bias when presenting or discussing their results, three reviews did not use adequate methods for the meta-analysis, the impact of publication bias was not investigated in three reviews, and the absence of a planned protocol to guide the review was noted in two reviews. Most reviews included trials of low quality (i.e., high risk of bias).
Results:
A total of 301 studies involving 27,960 participants were analysed in 21 systematic reviews. The review confirmed that cupping therapy is more effective than passive interventions such as heat therapy, usual care, conventional medications, and no treatment. However, its effectiveness is similar to acupuncture. There is not enough evidence to recommend cupping therapy for athletes, and there are associated risks such as hematoma, pain at the application site, increased pain, tingling sensations, and dizziness.
Conclusions:
Considering the standards, this umbrella review showed that most systematic reviews and meta-analyses using cupping therapy for musculoskeletal pain present low methodological quality. Most of the systematic reviews in this umbrella revealed that cupping therapy is ineffective in improving musculoskeletal pain in the athletic and general populations.
REFERENCES (40)
1.
Mehta P, Dhapte V. Cupping therapy: a prudent remedy for a plethora of medical ailments. J Tradit Complement Med. 2015;5(3):127–34; doi: 10.1016/j.jtcme.2014.11.036.
2.
Jeong YH, Healy LC, McEwan D. The application of Goal Setting Theory to goal setting interventions in sport: a systematic review. Int Rev Sport Exerc Psychol. 2023;16; doi: 10.1080/1750984X. 2021.1901298.
3.
Beedie C, Whyte G, Lane AM, Cohen E, Raglin J, Hurst P, Coleman D, Foad A. ‘Caution, this treatment is a placebo. It might work, but it might not’: why emerging mechanistic evidence for placebo effects does not legitimise complementary and alternative medicines in sport. Br J Sports Med. 2018;52(13):817–8; doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2017- 097747.
4.
Alawna M, Mohamed AA. Short-term and longterm effects of ankle joint taping and bandaging on balance, proprioception and vertical jump among volleyball players with chronic ankle instability. Phys Ther Sport. 2020;46:145–54; doi. org/10.1016/j.ptsp.2020.08.015.
5.
Davis HL, Alabed S, Chico TJA. Effect of sports massage on performance and recovery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2020;6:e000614; doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2019-000614.
6.
Rose C, Edwards KM, Siegler J, Graham K, Caillaud C. Whole-body cryotherapy as a recovery technique after exercise: a review of the literature. Int J Sports Med. 2017;38(14):1049–60; doi: 10.1055/ s-0043-114861.
7.
Cimmino MA, Ferrone C, Cutolo M. Epidemiology of chronic musculoskeletal pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2011;25 (2):173–83; doi: 10.1016/ j.berh.2010.01.012.
8.
Franco MF, Madaleno FO, de Paula TMN, Ferreira TV, Pinto RZ, Resende RA. Prevalence of overuse injuries in athletes from individual and team sports: a systematic review with meta-analysis and GRADE recommendations. Braz J Phys Ther. 2021;25(5):500–13; doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2021. 04.013.
9.
Cao H, Han M, Zhu X, Liu J. An overview of systematic reviews of clinical evidence for cupping therapy. J Trad Chin Med Sci. 2015;2(1):3–10; doi: 10.1016/j.jtcms.2014.11.012.
10.
Aboushanab TS, AlSanad S. Cupping therapy: an overview from a modern medicine perspective. J Acupunct Meridian Stud. 2018;11(3):83–7; doi: 10.1016/j.jams.2018.02.001.
11.
Wang L, Cai Z, Li X, Zhu A. Efficacy of cupping therapy on pain outcomes: an evidence-mapping study. Front Neurol. 2023;14:1266712; doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1266712.
12.
Al-Bedah AMN, Elsubai IS, Qureshi NA, Aboushanab TS, Ali GIM, El-Olemy AT, AAH, Khalil MKM, Alqaed MS. The medical perspective of cupping therapy: effects and mechanisms of action. J Tradit Complement Med. 2019;9(2):90–7; doi: 10.1016/j.jtcme.2018.03.003.
13.
Jüni P, Holenstein F, Sterne J, Bartlett C, Egger M. Direction and impact of language bias in metaanalyses of controlled trials: empirical study. Int J Epidemiol. 2002;31(1):115–23; doi: 10.1093/ije/ 31.1.115.
14.
Nussbaumer-Streit B, Klerings I, Dobrescu AI, Persad E, Stevens A, Garritty C, Kamel C, Affengruber L, King VJ, Gartlehner G. Excluding non- English publications from evidence-syntheses did not change conclusions: a meta-epidemiological study. J Clin Epidemiol. 2020;118:42–54; doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.10.011.
15.
Schünemann H, Guyatt G, Oxman A (eds.). GRADE handbook for grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. Updated October 2013. The GRADE Working Group, 2013.
16.
Bridgett R, Klose P, Duffield R, Mydock S, Lauche R. Effects of cupping therapy in amateur and professional athletes: systematic review of randomized controlled trials. J Altern Complement Med. 2018;24(3):208–19; doi: 10.1089/acm.2017.0191.
17.
Cao H, Li X, Yan X, Wang NS, Bensoussan A, Liu J. Cupping therapy for acute and chronic pain management: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials. J Trad Chin Med Sci. 2014;1(1):49– 61; doi: 10.1016/j.jtcms.2014.11.003.
18.
Moura CC, Chaves ÉCL, Cardoso ACLR, Nogueira DA, Corrêa HP, Chianca TCM. Cupping therapy and chronic back pain: systematic review and meta- analysis. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2018;26: e3094; doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.2888.3094.
19.
Cramer H, Klose P, Teut M, Rotter G, Ortiz M, Anheyer D, Linde K, Brinkhaus B. Cupping for patients with chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pain. 2020;21(9–10):943–56; doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2020.01.002.
20.
Kim JI, Lee MS, Lee DH, Boddy K, Ernst E. Cupping for treating pain: a systematic review. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2011;2011: 467014; doi: 10.1093/ecam/nep035.
21.
Seo J, Chu H, Kim C-H, Sung K-K, Lee S. Cupping therapy for migraine: a PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2021;2021:7582581; doi: 10.1155/ 2021/7582581.
22.
Wood S, Fryer G, Tan LLF, Cleary C. Dry cupping for musculoskeletal pain and range of motion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2020;24(4):503–18; doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt. 2020.06.024.
23.
Zhang Y-J, Cao H-J, Li X-L, Yang X-Y, Lai B-Y, Yang G-Y, Liu J-P. Cupping therapy versus acupuncture for pain-related conditions: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and trial sequential analysis. Chin Med. 2017;12; doi: 10.1186/s13020-017-0142-0.
24.
Li J-Q, Guo W, Sun Z-G, Huang Q-S, Lee E-Y, Wang Y, Yao X-D. Cupping therapy for treating knee osteoarthritis: the evidence from systematic review and meta-analysis. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2017;28:152–60; doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2017. 06.003.
25.
Ma S-Y, Wang Y, Xu J-Q, Zheng L. Cupping therapy for treating ankylosing spondylitis: the evidence from systematic review and meta-analysis. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2018;32:187–94; doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2018.07.001.
26.
Mohamed AA, Zhang X, Jan Y-K. Evidence-based and adverse-effects analyses of cupping therapy in musculoskeletal and sports rehabilitation: a systematic and evidence-based review. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2023;36:3–19; doi: 10.3233/ BMR-210242.
27.
Salazar-Méndez J, Cancino-Valderrama V, Aguilar- Román G, Guzmán-Muñoz E. Efficacy of cupping therapy in individuals with fibromyalgia. A systematic review of randomized clinical trials. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2023;36:256–62; doi: 10.1016/j. jbmt.2023.04.088.
28.
Wang Y-L, An C-M, Song S, Lei F-L, Wang Y. Cupping therapy for knee osteoarthritis: a synthesis of evidence. Complement Med Res. 2018;25: 249–55; doi: 10.1159/000488707.
29.
Wang YT, Qi Y, Tang FY, Li FM, Li QH, Xu CP, Xie G-P, Sun H-T. The effect of cupping therapy for low back pain: a meta-analysis based on existing randomized controlled trials. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2017;30:1187–95; doi: 10.3233/ BMR-169736.
30.
Yuan Q-L, Guo T-M, Liu L, Sun F, Zhang Y-G. Traditional Chinese medicine for neck pain and low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLOS ONE. 2015;10(2):e0117146; doi: 10.1371/ journal.pone.0117146.
31.
Zhang Z, Pasapula M, Wang Z, Edwards K, Norrish A. The effectiveness of cupping therapy on low back pain: a systematic review and metaanalysis of randomized control trials. Complement Ther Med. 2024;80 :103013; doi: 10.1016/j. ctim.2024.103013.
32.
Cao H, Liu J, Lewith GT. Traditional Chinese Medicine for treatment of fibromyalgia: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. J Altern Complement Med. 2010;16(4):397–409; doi: 10.1089/acm.2009.0599.
33.
Kim S, Lee S-H, Kim M-R, Kim E-J, Hwang D-S, Lee J, Shin J-S, Ha I-H, Lee YJ. Is cupping therapy effective in patients with neck pain? A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2018; 8(11):e021070; doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021070.
34.
Shen W-C, Jan Y-K, Liau B-Y, Lin Q, Wang S, Tai C-C, Lung C-W. Effectiveness of self-management of dry and wet cupping therapy for low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medi cine. 2022;101(51); doi: 10.1097/MD.00000000 00032325.
35.
Azizkhani M, Ghorat F, Soroushzadeh SMA, Karimi M, Yekaninejad S. The effect of cupping therapy on non-specific neck pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2018; 20(7):e55039; doi: 10.5812/ircmj.55039.
36.
Chaoju X, Zhangyin S, Changchun JI, Jinsheng Y. Efficacy and safety of blood pricking and cupping for treating nonspecific low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Tradit Chin Med. 2022;42(6):869–76; doi: 10.19852/j.cnki. jtcm.20220922.003.
37.
Furhad S, Sina RE, Bokhari AA. Cupping Therapy. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing. Available from: https:// www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK538253/ (accessed 05.09.2024).
38.
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, Shamseer L, Tetzlaff JM, Akl EA, Brennan SE, Chou R, Glanville J, Grimshaw JM, Hróbjartsson A, Lalu MM, Li T, Loder EW, Mayo-Wilson E, McDonald S, McGuinness LA, Stewart LA, Thomas J, Tricco AC, Welch VA, Whiting P, Moher D. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71; doi: 10.1136/ bmj.n71.
39.
Musumeci G. Could cupping therapy be used to improve sports performance? J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2016;1(4):373–7; doi: 10.3390/jfmk10 40373.
40.
Kittelson AJ, Hoogeboom TJ, Schenkman M, Stevens- Lapsley JE, Van Meeteren NLU. Person-centered care and physical therapy: a “people-like-me” approach. Phys Ther. 2020;100:99–106; doi: 10.1093/PTJ/PZZ139.
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
| eISSN: | 1899-1955 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
