ORIGINAL PAPER
The weight game in elite junior rowers: influence of body weight subdivisions on strength, power, and speed performance across distances from 100 to 6000 m
More details
Hide details
1
Health Sciences Center, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, CCS-UFRN, Natal, Brazil
2
Brazilian Rowing Confederation, Rio de Janeiro, CBR, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
3
Department of Physical Education, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, DEF-UFRN, Natal, Brazil
4
Department of Kinesiology and Sport Management, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA
5
School of Physical Education and Sport, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
6
Department of Physical Education, Federal University of Sergipe – UFS, São Cristovão, Sergipe, Brazil
7
School of Sport and Leisure, Polytechnic Institute of Viana do Castelo (ESDL-IPVC), Viana do Castelo, Portugal
Submission date: 2025-06-07
Acceptance date: 2025-11-20
Online publication date: 2026-06-09
Corresponding author
Paulo F. de Almeida-Neto
Health Sciences Center, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, CCS-UFRN, Natal, Brazil, Street Gen. Gustavo Cordeiro de Faria, 601 – Ribeira, Natal, Postal Code: 59012-570/ Natal, RN, Brazil
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Purpose:
The proposal to eliminate body weight (BW) subcategories in senior rowing at the 2028 Olympic Games may impact smaller-scale competitions, particularly in the junior category, favouring heavier athletes due to the contribution of BW to rowing biomechanics. Aim: To examine whether BW subcategories can influence performance in junior rowers.
Methods:
In this cross-sectional study, the National Rower Evaluation System data set was assessed and data from 235 rowing athletes (171 males and 64 females) in the under-seventeen and under-nineteen categories were analysed comparing anaerobic and aerobic power, strength and endurance within the BW subcategories (cut-off points for defining the subcategories: lightweight – male ≤ 72.5 kg, female ≤ 59 kg; heavyweight – male > 72.5 kg, female > 59 kg). Sprint speed (100-m/500-m) and endurance performance in competition distances (2000-m/6000-m) were evaluated using rowing ergometry. Muscle strength in bench-row (BR), bench-press (BP), squat, and deadlift was determined by one-repetition maximum (1RM).
Results:
At 100 m, higher BW and BR strength improved performance in both sexes. Lightweight athletes were 30.5% slower than heavyweight counterparts. At 500 m, BW, BR strength, and squat strength significantly influenced time in both sexes; however, female athletes performed 9.2% slower than males. At 2000-m, only the weight subcategory and its interaction with sex were significant, favouring heavyweight male rowers. No relevant associations were found at 6000-m.
Conclusions:
Body weight, upper-body pulling strength (bench row), and lower-body strength (squat) influence performance in short- and middle-distance events, regardless of sex. The advantage of heavier and stronger athletes does not persist over longer distances.
REFERENCES (46)
1.
Yusof AAM, Harun MN, Nasruddin FA, Syahrom A. Rowing biomechanics, physiology and hydrodynamic: a systematic review. Int J Sports Med. 2020;43(7):577–85; doi: 10.1055/a-1231-5268.
2.
Secher NH. The physiology of rowing. J Sports Sci. 1983;1(1):23–53; doi: 10.1080/02640418308729658.
3.
Nevill AM, Brown D, Godfrey R, Johnson PJ, Romer L, Stewart AD, Winter EM. Modeling maximum oxygen uptake of elite endurance athletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35(3):488–94; doi: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000053728.12929.5D.
4.
Smith TB, Hopkins WG. Measures of rowing performance. Sports Med. 2012;42(4):343–58; doi: 10.2165/11597230-000000000-00000.
5.
Lawton TW, Cronin JB, McGuigan MR. Strength testing and training of rowers: a review. Sports Med. 2011;41(5):413–32; doi: 10.2165/11588540-000000000-00000.
6.
McArdle W, Katch FI, Katch VL. Exercise physiology: nutrition, energy, and human performance. Baltimore: Wolters Kluwer Health; 2022.
9.
Majumdar P, Das A, Mandal M. Physical and strength variables as a predictor of 2000m rowing ergometer performance in elite rowers. J Phys Educ Sport. 2017;17(4):2502–07; doi: 10.7752/jpes.2017.04281.
10.
Kleshnev V. The biomechanics of rowing. In: Kleshnev V (ed.), Rowing. Ramsbury: Crowood Press; 2016;105–21.
11.
Mikulic P. Development of aerobic and anaerobic power in adolescent rowers: a 5-year follow-up study. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2011; 21(6):e143–9; doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2010.01200.x.
12.
Winkert K, Steinacker JM, Machus K, Dreyhaupt J, Treff G. Anthropometric profiles are associated with long-term career attainment in elite junior rowers: a retrospective analysis covering 23 years. Eur J Sport Sci. 2019; 19(2):208–16; doi: 10.1080/17461391.2018.1497089.
13.
Cerasola D, Cataldo A, Bellafiore M, Traina M, Palma A, Bianco A, Capranica L. Race profiles of rowers during the 2014 Youth Olympic Games. J Strength Cond Res. 2018;32(7):2055–60; doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002364.
15.
Volianitis S, Koutedakis Y, Secher NH. Editorial: advances in rowing physiology. Front Physiol. 2022;13:939229; doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.939229.
16.
Astridge DJ, Peeling P, Goods PSR, Girard O, Hewlett J, Rice AJ, Binnie MJ. Rowing in Los Angeles: performance considerations for the change to 1500 m at the 2028 Olympic Games. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2022;18(1):104–107; doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2022-0231.
17.
Giesbrecht J. In defense of lightweight rowing. Sport Ethics Philos. 2023;17(3):290–305; doi: 10.1080/17511321.2022.2148725.
18.
Moore SA, McKay HA, Macdonald H, Nettlefold L, Baxter-Jones ADG, Cameron N, Brasher PMA. Enhancing a somatic maturity prediction model. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015; 47(8):1755–64; doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000588.
19.
McKay AKA, Stellingwerff T, Smith ES, Martin DT, Mujika I, Goosey-Tolfrey VL, Sheppard J, Burke LM. Defining training and performance caliber: a participant classification framework. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2022;17(2):317–31; doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2021-0451.
20.
Nobuyuki M, Motohiko M, Izumi T, Noriko S, Tomohiro H, Takeyuki N. Relationship between muscle strength and anthropometric, body composition parameters in Japanese adolescents. Health. 2012;4(1):1–5; doi: 10.4236/health.2012.41001.
21.
Von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, Initiative S. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet. 2007;370:1453–7, doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61602-X.
22.
Harriss DJ, Jones C, MacSween A. Ethical standards in sport and exercise science research: 2022 update. Int J Sports Med. 2022;43(13):1065–70; doi: 10.1055/a-1957-2356.
23.
Da Silva VS, Soares Vieira MF. International Society for the Advancement of Kinanthropometry (ISAK) Global: international accreditation scheme of the competent anthropometrist. Rev Bras Cineantropom Desempenho Hum. 2022;22:e70517; doi: 10.1590/1980-0037.2020v22e70517.
24.
Ainsworth BE, Watson KB, Ridley K, Pfeiffer KA, Herrmann SD, Crouter SE, McMurray RG, Butte NF, Bassett Jr DR, Trost SG, Berrigan D, Fulton JE. Utility of the youth compendium of physical activities. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2018;89(3):273–81; doi: 10.1080/02701367.2018.1487754.
25.
Herrmann SD, Willis EA, Ainsworth BE. The 2024 Compendium of Physical Activities and its expansion. J Sport Health Sci. 2024;13(1):1–2; doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2023.09.008.
26.
Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Leon AS, Jacobs Jr DR, Montoye HJ, Sallis JF, Paffenbarger Jr RS. Compendium of physical activities: classification of energy costs of human physical activities. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1993;25(1):71–80; doi: 10.1249/00005768-199301000-00011.
28.
de Almeida-Neto PF, de Morais Ferreira AB, Baxter-Jones A, de Medeiros JA, da Silva LF, Silva Dantas PM, de Araújo Tinôco Cabral BG. Physiological mechanisms of muscle strength and power are dependent on the years post obtaining peak height velocity in elite juniors rowers: a cross-sectional study. PLOS ONE. 2023;18(6):e0286687; doi: 10.3390/app16021066.
29.
Deurenberg P, Weststrate JA, Seidell JC. Body mass index as a measure of body fatness: age-and sex-specific prediction formulas. Br J Nutr. 1991;65(2):105–14; doi: 10.1079/BJN19910073.
30.
Klusiewicz A, Borkowski L, Sitkowski D, Burkhard-Jagodzińska K, Szczepańska B, Ładyga M. Indirect methods of assessing maximal oxygen uptake in rowers: practical implications for evaluating physical fitness in a training cycle. J Hum Kinet. 2016;50:187–94; doi: 10.1515/hukin-2015-0155.
31.
Klusiewicz A, Faff J. Indirect methods of estimating maximal oxygen uptake on the rowing ergometer. Biol Sport. 2003;20(3):181–194.
32.
Cohen J. A power primer. Psychol Bull. 1992;112(1):1155–59; doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155.
33.
De Almeida-Neto PF, da Silva LF, Miarka B, De Medeiros JA, da Silva Cunha de Medeiros RC, Azevedo Teixeira RP, Aidar FJ, De Araujo Tinoco Cabral BG, Silva Dantas PM. Influence of advancing biological maturation on aerobic and anaerobic power and on sport performance of junior rowers: a longitudinal study. Front Physiol. 2022;13:892966; doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.892966.
34.
Kaczor JJ, Ziolkowski W, Popinigis J, Tarnopolsky MA. Anaerobic and aerobic enzyme activities in human skeletal muscle from children and adults. Pediatr Res. 2005;57(3):331–35; doi: 10.1203/01.PDR.0000150799.77094.DE.
35.
De Almeida-Neto PF, da Silva LF da, de Matos DG, Jeffreys I, de Macedo Cesário T, Barboza Neto R, de Almeida Barbosa W, Aidar FJ, Silva Dantas PM, de Araújo Tinoco Cabral BG. Equation for analyzing the peak power in aquatic environment: an alternative for olympic rowing athletes. PLOS ONE. 2020;15(12):e0243157; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243157.
36.
Larochelambert Q de, Del Vecchio S, Leroy A, Duncombe S, Toussaint JF, Sedeaud A. Body and boat: significance of morphology on elite rowing performance. Front Sports Act Living. 2020;2:597676; doi: 10.3389/fspor.2020.597676.
37.
Perić D, Ilić N, Ahmetovićvić Z. Kinematic and dynamic stroke variables of elite and sub-elite rowers. Int J Perform Anal Sport. 2019;19(1):65–75; doi: 10.1080/24748668.2018.1563857.
38.
Kaloupsis S, Bogdanis GC, Dimakopoulou E, Maridaki M. Anthropometric characteristics and somatotype of young Greek rowers. Biol Sport. 2008;25(1):57–69.
39.
Adhikari A, McNeely E. Anthropometric characteristic, somatotype and body composition of Canadian female rowers. Am J Sports Sci. 2015;3(3):61–66; doi: 10.11648/j.ajss.20150303.15.
40.
Kutseryb T, Vovkanych L, Hrynkiv M, Majevska S, Muzyka F. Peculiarities of the somatotype of athletes with different directions of the training process. J Phys Educ Sport. 2017;17(1):431–35; doi: 10.7752/jpes.2017.01064.
41.
León-Guereño P, Urdampilleta A, Zourdos MC, Mielgo-Ayuso J. Anthropometric profile, body composition and somatotype of traditional elite oars: transversal study [in Spanish]. Rev Esp Nutr Huma Diet. 2018;22(4):279–86; doi: 10.14306/renhyd.22.4.605.
42.
Penichet-Tomas A, Pueo B, Selles-Perez S, Jimenez-Olmedo JM. Analysis of anthropometric and body composition profile in male and female traditional rowers. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(15):7826; doi: 10.3390/ijerph18157826.
43.
Kim CH, Wheatley CM, Behnia M, Johnson BD. The effect of aging on relationships between lean body mass and VO2max in rowers. PLOS ONE. 2016;11(8):e0160275; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160275.
44.
Baudouin A, Hawkins D. A biomechanical review of factors affecting rowing performance. Br J Sports Med. 2002;36(6):396–402; doi: 10.1136/bjsm.36.6.396.
45.
Jensen M, Stellingwerff T, Pollock C, Wakeling J, Klimstra M. Can principal component analysis be used to explore the relationship of rowing kinematics and force production in elite rowers during a step test? A pilot study. Mach Learn Knowl Extr. 2023;5(1):237–51; doi: 10.3390/make5010015.
46.
Mäestu J, Lelle R, Mäestu E, Pind R, Vahtra E, Purge P, Mikulic P. Long-term rowing performance development in male olympic and world championship medal winners compared with nonmedalists. J Strength Cond Res. 2023;37(9):e521–6; doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004479.