ORIGINAL PAPER
Influence of carbon fibre plate geometry on lower limb kinematic asymmetry in well-trained endurance runners: a biomechanical investigation
More details
Hide details
1
Research Academy of Medicine Combining Sports, Ningbo No. 2 Hospital, Ningbo, China
2
Faculty of Sports Science, Ningbo University, Ningbo, China
3
Doctoral School on Safety and Security Sciences, Óbuda University, Budapest, Hungary
4
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China
5
Human Performance Laboratory, Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
6
Research Institute of Sport Science, Hungarian University of Sport Science, Budapest, Hungary
Submission date: 2025-07-02
Acceptance date: 2026-01-14
Online publication date: 2026-03-10
Corresponding author
Yufei Fang
Research Academy of Medicine Combining Sports, Ningbo No. 2 Hospital, No. 41, Xibei Road, Haishu District Ningbo, Zhejiang, 315099, China
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Purpose:
This study explored how variations in the curvature of carbon fibre plates embedded in running shoes affect gait symmetry of the lower limbs in well-trained long-distance runners.
Methods:
Sixteen well-trained runners participated in biomechanical testing under two shoe conditions (flat vs. curved carbon plates) using a Vicon 3D motion capture system (Oxford Metrics Ltd., Oxford, UK) and force plates. Symmetry angle (SA) was calculated for joint angles, moments, and stiffness to assess bilateral symmetry. SPM_1d (One-dimensional Statistical Parametric Mapping) was used to compare time-series joint angle data between shoe types. Two-way ANOVA examined peak joint moments and stiffness across limbs and shoe conditions, while paired t-tests assessed SA differences in joint range of motion, peak moments, and stiffness.
Results:
The results showed that curved carbon plate shoes demonstrated better symmetry in peak ankle eversion and external rotation moments, peak knee external rotation moments and abduction–adduction stiffness, and hip rotational stiffness, suggesting that improved load distribution may help reduce the injury risk typically associated with asymmetric joint loading. In contrast, flat carbon plate shoes exhibited superior symmetry in hip rotational angles and knee flexion-extension stiffness, indicating potential advantages in promoting lower limb coordination.
Conclusions:
These findings preliminarily suggest that the geometry of carbon fibre plates significantly influences lower limb biomechanical symmetry and dynamic characteristics, potentially regulating overall gait coordination through kinetic chain interactions. This study offers biomechanical insights to optimise running shoe design and improve performance and injury prevention in long-distance running.
REFERENCES (36)
1.
Song Y, Cen X, Chen H, Sun D, Munivrana G, Bálint K, Bíró I, Gu Y. The influence of running shoe with different carbon-fiber plate designs on internal foot mechanics: a pilot computational analysis. J Biomech. 2023;153:111597; doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2023.111597.
2.
Chen H, Shao E, Sun D, Xuan R, Baker JS, Gu Y. Effects of footwear with different longitudinal bending stiffness on biomechanical characteristics and muscular mechanics of lower limbs in adolescent runners. Front Physiol. 2022;13:907016; doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.907016.
3.
Song Y, Cen X, Sun D, Bálint K, Wang Y, Chen H, Gao S, Bíró I, Zhang M, Gu Y. Curved carbon-plated shoe may further reduce forefoot loads compared to flat plate during running. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):13215; doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-64177-3.
4.
Xu Y, Zhu C, Fang Y, Lu Z, Song Y, Hu C, Sun D, Gu Y. The effects of different carbon-fiber plate shapes in shoes on lower limb biomechanics following running-induced fatigue. Front Bioeng Biotech. 2025;13:1539976; doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1539976.
5.
Gao Z, Fekete G, Baker JS, Liang M, Xuan R, Gu Y. Effects of running fatigue on lower extremity symmetry among amateur runners: from a biomechanical perspective. Front Physiol. 2022;13:899818; doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.899818.
6.
Gao S, Song Y, Sun D, Cen X, Wang M, Lu Z, Gu Y. Impact of Becker muscular dystrophy on gait patterns: insights from biomechanical analysis. Gait Posture. 2025;121:160–165; doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2025.05.008.
7.
Cai J, Liu Q, Chen H, Xu Y, Dong S, Rong M, Gu Y. A biomechanical study of lower limb distal joint asymmetry during running using bionic shoe. Molecul Cell Biomech. 2025;22(4):323; doi: 10.62617/mcb323.
8.
Larsen P, Laessoe U, Rasmussen S, Graven-Nielsen T, Eriksen CB, Elsoe R. Asymmetry in gait pattern following tibial shaft fractures–a prospective one-year follow-up study of 49 patients. Gait Posture. 2017;51:47–51; doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.09.027.
9.
Guan Y, Bredin SS, Taunton J, Jiang Q, Wu N, Warburton DE. Association between inter-limb asymmetries in lower-limb functional performance and sport injury: a systematic review of prospective cohort studies. J Clin Med. 2022;11(2):360; doi: 10.3390/jcm11020360.
10.
Helme M, Tee J, Emmonds S, Low C. Does lower-limb asymmetry increase injury risk in sport? A systematic review. Phys Ther Sport. 2021;49:204–13; doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2021.03.001.
11.
Seymore KD, Corrigan P, Sigurðsson HB, Pohlig RT, Silbernagel KG. Asymmetric running is associated with pain during outdoor running in individuals with Achilles tendinopathy in the return-to-sport phase. Phys Ther Sport. 2024;67:25–30; doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2024.02.006.
12.
Beck ON, Azua EN, Grabowski AM. Step time asymmetry increases metabolic energy expenditure during running. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2018;118(10):2147–54; doi: 10.1007/s00421-018-3939-3.
13.
Luftglass AR, Peebles AT, Miller TK, Queen RM. The impact of standardized footwear on load and load symmetry. Clin Biomech. 2021;88:105421; doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2021.105421.
14.
Jandová S, Sparks M, Oleśniewicz P, Charousek J, Chrástková M, Markiewicz J. Changes in the foot strike pattern and pressure distribution when running in minimalist and traditional sport shoes. Med Sport. 2018;71(2):257–67; doi: 10.23736/S0025-7826.18.03029-6.
15.
Jandova S, Volf P, Vaverka F. The influence of minimalist and conventional sports shoes and lower limbs dominance on running gait. Acta of Bioeng Biomech. 2018;20(3):3–9; doi: 10.5277/ABB-01120-2018-02.
16.
Zhu C, Song Y, Xu Y, Zhu A, Baker JS, Liu W, Gu Y. Toe box shape of running shoes affects in-shoe foot displacement and deformation: a randomized crossover study. Bioeng. 2024;11(5):457; doi: 10.3390/bioengineering11050457.
17.
Dhahbi W: Editioral: Advancing biomechanics: enhancing sports performance, mitigating injury risks, and optimizing athlete rehabilitation. Front Sports Act Living. 2025;7:1556024; doi: 10.3389/fspor.2025.1556024.
18.
Puig-Diví A, Escalona-Marfil C, Padullés-Riu JM, Busquets A, Padullés-Chando X, Marcos-Ruiz D. Validity and reliability of the Kinovea program in obtaining angles and distances using coordinates in 4 perspectives. PLOS ONE. 2019;14(6):e0216448; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216448.
19.
Cen X, Yu P, Song Y, Sun D, Liang M, Bíró I, Gu Y. Influence of medial longitudinal arch flexibility on lower limb joint coupling coordination and gait impulse. Gait Posture, 2024;114:208–14; doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2024.10.002.
20.
Foch E, Brindle RA, Pohl MB. Lower extremity kinematics during running and hip abductor strength in iliotibial band syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gait Posture. 2023;101:73–81; doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2023.02.001.
21.
Dong X, Li C, Liu J, Huang P, Jiang G, Zhang M, Zhang W, Zhang X. The effect of running on knee joint cartilage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Phy Ther Sport. 2021;47:147–55; doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2020.11.030.
22.
Dhahbi W, Materne O, Chamari K. Rethinking knee injury prevention strategies: joint-by-joint training approach paradigm versus traditional focused knee strengthening. Biol Sport. 2025;42(4):59–65; doi: 10.5114/biolsport.2025.148544.
23.
Gao Z, Mei Q, Fekete G, Baker JS, Gu Y. The effect of prolonged running on the symmetry of biomechanical variables of the lower limb joints. Symmetry. 2020;12(5):720; doi: 10.3390/sym12050720.
24.
Miyazaki T, Aimi T, Yamada Y, Nakamura Y. Curved carbon plates inside running shoes modified foot and shank angular velocity improving mechanical efficiency at the ankle joint. J Biomech. 2024;172:112224; doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.112224.
25.
Hébert-Losier K, Pamment M. Advancements in running shoe technology and their effects on running economy and performance – a current concepts overview. Sports Biomech. 2023;22(3):335–50; doi: 10.1080/14763141.2022.2110512.
26.
Stefanyshyn DJ, Wannop JW. The influence of forefoot bending stiffness of footwear on athletic injury and performance. Footwear Sci. 2016;8(2):51–63; doi: 10.1080/19424280.2016.1144652.
27.
Cigoja S, Firminger CR, Asmussen MJ, Fletcher JR, Edwards WB, Nigg BM. Does increased midsole bending stiffness of sport shoes redistribute lower limb joint work during running? J Sci Med Sport. 2019;22(11):1272–77; doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2019.06.015.
28.
Furlong L-A, Egginton NL. Kinetic asymmetry during running at preferred and nonpreferred speeds. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 2018;50(6):1241–48; doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001560.
29.
Koźlenia D, Struzik A, Domaradzki J. Force, power, and morphology asymmetries as injury risk factors in physically active men and women. Symmetry. 2022;14(4):787; doi:10.3390/sym14040787.
30.
Cigoja S, Fletcher JR, Esposito M, Stefanyshyn DJ, Nigg BM. Increasing the midsole bending stiffness of shoes alters gastrocnemius medialis muscle function during running. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):749; doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-80791-3.
31.
Tajik R, Dhahbi W, Fadaei H, Mimar R. Muscle synergy analysis during badminton forehand overhead smash: integrating electromyography and musculoskeletal modeling. Front Sports Act Living. 2025;7:1596670; doi: 10.3389/fspor.2025.1596670.
32.
Wren TA, Mueske NM, Brophy CH, Pace JL, Katzel MJ, Edison BR, Vandenberg,CD, Zaslow TL. Hop distance symmetry does not indicate normal landing biomechanics in adolescent athletes with recent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2018;48(8):622–9; doi: 10.2519/jospt.2018.7817.
33.
Wang J, Qin Z, Zhang Q, Wang J. Lower limb dynamic balance, strength, explosive power, agility, and injuries in volleyball players. J Orthop Surg Res. 2025;20(1):211; doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-05566-w.
34.
Tessutti V, Diniz AA, Signorini L, Soares HB, Vidotto MC, Yi LC. Sonification of plantar pressure in runners with and without pain after running practice. Hum Mov. 2024;25(1):123–30; doi: 10.5114/hm.2024.136931.
35.
Souaifi M, Dhahbi W, Jebabli N, Ceylan Hİ, Boujabli M, Muntean RI, Dergaa I. Artificial intelligence in sports biomechanics: a scoping review on wearable technology, motion analysis, and injury prevention. Bioengineering. 2025;12(8):887; doi: 10.3390/bioengineering12080887.
36.
Song Y, Cen X, Wang M, Gao Z, Tan Q, Sun D, Gu Y, Wang Y, Zhang M. A systematic review of finite element analysis in running footwear biomechanics: insights for running-related musculoskeletal injuries. J Sports Sci Med. 2025;24(2):370–87; doi: 10.52082/jssm.2025.370.