ORIGINAL PAPER
Angular kinematics and asymmetries in young female soccer players: assessment of technical skills
 
More details
Hide details
1
State University of Maringá (UEM), Maringá (PR), Brasil
 
These authors had equal contribution to this work
 
 
Submission date: 2025-07-09
 
 
Acceptance date: 2026-01-27
 
 
Online publication date: 2026-05-21
 
 
Corresponding author
Bruna Felix Apoloni   

Associate Post Graduate Program in Physical Education UEM/UEL, State University of Maringá (UEM), Av. Colombo 5790 – Maringá (PR), 87020-900 Brasil
 
 
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Purpose:
Biomechanical characteristics and asymmetries are key factors in optimising performance among young female football players. This study aimed to characterise angular kinematics and asymmetries of the upper and lower limbs during the execution of four technical skills: heading, kicking, passing, and dribbling.

Methods:
Twenty-two female athletes from the U15 and U17 age groups participated in the study. Three-dimensional kinematic data were collected using the Vicon® system to analyse body angles, and inter-limb asymmetries were quantified using the normalised symmetry index (NSI).

Results:
Significant differences were observed in ankle range of motion during heading (p = 0.00; r = 0.63) and in pelvic movement during passing (p = 0.01; r = 0.52), both showing large effect sizes and greater amplitude in the non-dominant limb. Across all analysed skills, there was a general tendency to favour the dominant side, particularly in the ankle and pelvis joints. Asymmetry values stayed within the 10–15% range frequently documented in previous studies.

Conclusions:
These results emphasise measurable asymmetries in young female football players and enhance the current understanding of biomechanical performance. These findings further support the development of targeted interventions and specialised training strategies designed to correct imbalances and enhance technical skills.
REFERENCES (40)
1.
Bandyopadhyay K, Naha S, Mitra S. FIFA World Cup and beyond: sport, culture, media and governance. Sport Soci. 2017; 20(5–6):547–54; doi: 10.1080/17430437.2016.1158475.
 
2.
Ángel-López JP, Segura-Giraldo B, Rodríguez-Sotelo LD, García-Solano KB. Kinematic soccer kick analysis using a motion capture system. In: Torres I, Bustamante J, Sierra DA (ed.). VII Latin American Congress on Biomedical Engineering CLAIB 2016, Bucaramanga, Santander, Colombia, October 26th–28th, 2016. Singapore: Springer Singapore; 2017, 682–5; doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-4086-3_171.
 
3.
Bahenský P, Marko D, Bunc V, Tlustý P. Power, muscle, and take-off asymmetry in young soccer players. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(17):6040; doi: 10.3390/ijerph17176040.
 
4.
Teixeira LA, Paroli R. Lateral asymmetries in motor actions: preference versus performance. Motriz J Phys Educ. 2000;6(1):1–8.
 
5.
Guiard Y. Asymmetric division of labor in human skilled bimanual action: the kinematic chain as a model. J Mot Behav. 1987; 19(4):486–17; doi: 10.1080/00222895.1987.10735426.
 
6.
Čuk T, Leben-Seljak P, Štefančič M. Lateral asymmetry of human long bones. Poznań: Adam Mic­kiewicz University; 2001.
 
7.
Read PJ, McAuliffe S, Bishop C, Oliver JL, Graham-Smith P, Farooq MA. Asymmetry thresholds for common screening tests and their effects on jump performance in professional soccer players. J Athl Train. 2021;56(1):46–53;doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-0013.20.
 
8.
Loturco I, Pereira LA, Kobal R, Abad CCC, Rosseti M, Carpes FP, Bishop C. Do asymmetry scores influence speed and power performance in elite female soccer players? Biol Sport. 2019; 36(3):209–16; doi: 10.5114/biolsport.2019.85454.
 
9.
Rutkowska-Kucharska A. Asymmetry of lower limb strength and jumping ability of young soccer players. Acta Bioeng Biomech. 2020;22(1):79–85.
 
10.
De Andrade AGP, Carpes FP. A new approach to quantify asymmetry in human movement. J Biomech. 2024;170:112158; doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.112158.
 
11.
Kocaoğlu Y, Girgin Y. Effects of foot preference on postural control in soccer players. Turk J Kinesiol. 2023;9(1):67–76; doi: 10.31459/turkjkin.1203374.
 
12.
Bishop C, Turner A, Read P. Effects of inter-limb asymmetries on physical and sports performance: a systematic review. J Sports Sci. 2018;36(10):1135–44; doi: 10.1080/02640414.2017.1361894.
 
13.
Thomas C, Dos Santos T, Comfort P, Jones PA. Male and female soccer players exhibit different knee joint mechanics during pre-planned change of direction. Sports Biomech. 2024; 23(1):118–31; doi: 10.1080/14763141.2020.1830160.
 
14.
Souglis AG, Travlos AK, Andronikos G. The effect of proprioceptive training on technical soccer skills in female soccer. Int J Sports Sci Coach. 2023;18(3):748–60; doi: 10.1177/17479541221097857.
 
15.
Van Der Vegt BR, Gepp A, Keogh JWL, Farley JB. Methods of performance analysis in women’s Australian football: a scoping review. PeerJ. 2023;11:e14946; doi: 10.7717/peerj.14946.
 
16.
Mirwald RL, Baxter-Jones ADG, Bailey DA, Beunen GP. An assessment of maturity from anthropometric measurements. Med Sci Sports Exer. 2002;34(4):689–94; doi: 10.1097/00005768-200204000-00020.
 
17.
Thomas JR, Nelson JK. Descriptive research. In: Thomas JR, Nelson JK (eds.) Research Methods in Physical Activity. 3rd ed. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 2002; pp. 280–301.
 
18.
Guedes DP, Guedes JE. Practical manual for assessment in physical education [in Portuguese]. Barueri: Ma­nole; 2006..
 
19.
Katis A, Kellis E. Is soccer kick performance better after a “faking” (cutting) maneuver task? Sports Biomech. 2011;10(1):35–45; doi: 10.1080/14763141.2010.547594.
 
20.
Sujae IH, Abdul Jabbar K, Ong CY, Hamill J. Differences in joint loading during a side-step cutting manoeuvre on different artificial turf infill depths. Sports Biomech. 2022; 21(9):981–92; doi: 10.1080/14763141.2020.1713206.
 
21.
Zago M, Motta AF, Mapelli A, Annoni I, Galvani C, Sforza C. Effect of leg dominance on the center-of-mass kinematics during an inside-of-the-foot kick in amateur soccer players. J Hum Kinet. 2014;42:51–61; doi: 10.2478/hukin-2014-0060.
 
22.
Dupré T, Tryba J, Potthast W. Muscle activity of cutting manoeuvres and soccer inside passing suggests an increased groin injury risk during these movements. Sci Rep. 2021;11:7223; doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-86666-5.
 
23.
Barbieri FA, Gobbi LTB, Santiago PRP, Cunha SA. Performance comparisons of the kicking of stationary and rolling balls in a futsal context. Sports Biomech. 2010;9(1):1–15; doi: 10.1080/14763141003690211.
 
24.
Levanon J, Dapena J. Comparison of the kinematics of the full-instep and pass kicks in soccer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998;30(6):917–27; doi: 10.1097/00005768-199806000-00022.
 
25.
Requena B, Garcia I, Requena F, Bressel E, Saez-Saez De Villarreal E, Cronin J. Association between traditional standing vertical jumps and a soccer-specific vertical jump. Eur J Sport Sci. 2014;14(suppl 1):S398–405; doi: 10.1080/17461391.2012.708790.
 
26.
Dezman ZDW, Ledet EH, Kerr HA. Neck strength imbalance correlates with increased head acceleration in soccer heading. Sports Health. 2013;5(4):320–6; doi: 10.1177/1941738113480935.
 
27.
Lukášek M, Kalichová M. Injury risks of heading in young football players. J Hum Sport Exerc. 2015;10(Proc1):S490–99; doi: 10.14198/jhse.2015.10.Proc1.43.
 
28.
Kristensen LB, Andersen TB, Sørensen H. Optimizing segmental movement in the jumping header in soccer. Sports Biomech. 2004;3(2):195–208; doi: 10.1080/14763140408522840.
 
29.
Alves BMO, Silva Jr. RAD, Rosa LM, Mesquita TRD, Oliveira PRD, Burigo RL, Amorim CF. Postural control analysis during a standardized kick task in soccer athletes. Rev Bras Med Esporte. 2018; 24(2):89–96; doi: 10.1590/1517-869220182402181470.
 
30.
Queen R, Dickerson L, Ranganathan S, Schmitt D. A novel method for measuring asymmetry in kinematic and kinetic variables: the normalized symmetry index. J Biomech. 2020;99:109531; doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.109531.
 
31.
Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
 
32.
Almansoof HS, Nuhmani S, Muaidi Q. Correlation of ankle dorsiflexion range of motion with lower-limb kinetic chain function and hop test performance in healthy male recreational athletes. PeerJ. 2023;11:e14877; doi: 10.7717/peerj.14877.
 
33.
Akins JS. Development and evaluation of instrumented soccer equipment to collect ankle joint kinematics in the field [dissertation]. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh; 2013.
 
34.
Ouellette J. A message from NASPE sport structures: principles of play for soccer. Strategies. 2004; 17(3):26; doi: 10.1080/08924562.2004.10591082.
 
35.
Boyne M, Simms C, van Dyk N, Farrell G, Farrell E, McHugh C, Wall J, Mockler D, Wilson F. It’s not all about power: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing sex-based differences in kicking biomechanics in soccer. Sports Biomech. 2024;23(11):1809–52; doi: 10.1080/14763141.2021.1981426.
 
36.
Raya-González J, Clemente FM, Castillo D. Analyzing the magnitude of interlimb asymmetries in young female soccer players: a preliminary study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(2):475; doi: 10.3390/ijerph18020475.
 
37.
Fox KT, Pearson LT, Hicks KM. The effect of lower inter-limb asymmetries on athletic performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLOS ONE. 2023;18(6):e0286942; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286942.
 
38.
Kahla AB, Elghoul Y, Masmoudi L, Dahmen R. Longitudinal investigation of lateral asymmetry reduction: exploring the impact of bilateral practice on soccer skill development in young players. J Motor Control Learn. 2024;6(1):e145443; doi: 10.5812/jmcl-145443.
 
39.
Maio M de, Di Rocco F, Papale O, Festino E, Fus­co A, Cortis C. Could mini-trampoline training be considered as a new strategy to reduce asymme­tries? Appl Sci. 2023;13(5):3193; doi: 10.3390/app13053193.
 
40.
Afonso J, Virgile A, Peña J, Jordan M, García-de-Alcaraz A, Sá M, Bishop C. On uneven ground: embracing the challenges of inter-limb asymmetries and their assessment. Asymmetry. 2025;2(1):0004; doi: 10.55092/asymmetry20250004.
 
eISSN:1899-1955
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top