ORIGINAL PAPER
A study of the fastest courses for professional triathletes competing in IRONMAN® triathlons
 
More details
Hide details
1
Faculty of Sports, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
 
2
Ultra Sports Science Foundation, Pierre-Benite, France
 
3
Institute of Primary Care, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
 
4
Keizo Asami Institute of Immunopathology, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil
 
5
CI-ISCE, Higher Institute of Educational Sciences of the Douro, Penafiel, Portugal
 
6
Department of Sports, Instituto Politécnico de Bragança, Bragança, Portugal
 
7
School of Health and Caring Sciences, University of West Attica, Athens, Greece
 
8
Faculty of Sport and Physical Education, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
 
9
Medbase St. Gallen Am Vadianplatz, St. Gallen, Switzerland
 
 
Submission date: 2024-01-07
 
 
Acceptance date: 2024-05-27
 
 
Publication date: 2024-06-28
 
 
Corresponding author
Beat Knechtle   

Gesundheitszentrum St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
 
 
Hum Mov. 2024;25(2):148-160
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Purpose:
The IRONMAN® triathlon is an endurance multisport discipline of high popularity. Professional IRONMAN® triathletes need to qualify for the IRONMAN® World Championships and, therefore, would benefit from identifying the fastest race courses. Our purpose was to identify the fastest races held for professional IRONMAN® triathletes competing from 2002 to 2022.

Methods:
This was an observational study, sampling 7,078 race records (380 different events in 55 different event locations) of professional IRONMAN® triathletes of both sexes (4,235 males and 2,843 females). We downloaded information about sex, nationality, both split (swimming, cycling, and running) and overall race times, the event location, and the year. Information about race course characteristics, water temperatures, and air temperatures was obtained. Descriptive statistics were calculated for each event location, and factorial ANOVA tests were used to explore the statistical significance of the results. A confidence interval of 95% was adopted.

Results:
The fastest overall IRONMAN® average race times were achieved during the IRONMAN® Tallinn, IRONMAN® Switzerland held in Thun, and IRONMAN® Des Moines. A lake for the swim split characterized the first five courses, while the bike split featured rolling or hilly terrain. For the run split, most of the courses were characterized as flat. For environmental characteristics, lower water and air temperatures also added time to the average finish time.

Conclusions:
Understanding the fastest race courses and their characteristics would assist professional IRONMAN® triathletes in selecting races that offer the optimal conditions for their competition. Fast IRONMAN® race courses typically feature a lakeside swim course, a rolling or hilly bike course, and a flat run course.

 
REFERENCES (32)
1.
Loland S. Sport sciences and ECSS: approaches and challenges. Apunts Educ Fis Deportes. 2013; (111):7–14.
 
2.
Renfree A, Casado A. Athletic races represent complex systems, and pacing behavior should be viewed as an emergent phenomenon. Front Physiol. 2018;9; doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.01432.
 
3.
Rees T, Hardy L, Gullich A, Abernethy B, Cote J, Woodman T, Montgomery H, Laing S, Warr C. The Great British medalists project: a review of current knowledge on the development of the World’s Best Sporting Talent. Sports Med. 2016;46(8): 1041–58; doi: 10.1007/s40279-016-0476-2.
 
4.
Cote J, Macdonald D, Baker J, Abernethy B. When “where” is more important than “when”: birthplace and birthdate effects on the achievement of sporting expertise. J Sports Sci. 2006;24(10): 1065–73; doi: 10.1080/02640410500432490.
 
5.
Thuany M, Valero D, Villiger E, Forte P, Weiss K, Nikolaidis PT, Andrade MS, Cuk I, Sousa CV, Knechtle B. A machine learning approach to finding the fastest race course for professional athletes competing in Ironman(®) 70.3 races between 2004 and 2020. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(4); doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043619.
 
6.
Cushman DM, Dowling N, Ehn M, Kotler DH. Triathlon considerations. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2022;33(1):81–90; doi: 10.1016/j.pmr. 2021.08.006.
 
7.
Gadelha AB, Sousa CV, Sales MM, Dos Santos Rosa T, Flothmann M, Barbosa LP, da Silva Aguiar S, Olher RR, Villiger E, Nikolaidis PT, Rosemann T, Hill L, Knechtle B. Cut-off values in the prediction of success in Olympic distance triathlon. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(24); doi: 10.3390/ijerph17249491.
 
8.
Barbosa LP, Sousa CV, Sales MM, Olher RDR, Aguiar SS, Santos PA, Tiozzo E, Simões HG, Nikolaidis PT, Knechtle B. Celebrating 40 years of Ironman: how the champions perform. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(6); doi: 10.3390/ ijerph16061019.
 
9.
Jeukendrup AE, Jentjens RL, Moseley L. Nutritional considerations in triathlon. Sports Med. 2005; 35(2):163–81; doi: 10.2165/00007256-2005350 20-00005.
 
10.
Sinisgalli R, de Lira CAB, Vancini RL, Puccinelli PJG, Hill L, Knechtle B, Nikolaidis PT, Andrade MS. Impact of training volume and experience on amateur Ironman triathlon performance. Physiol Behav. 2021;232:113344; doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh. 2021.113344.
 
11.
Etxebarria N, Mujika I, Pyne DB. Training and competition readiness in triathlon. Sports. 2019; 7(5); doi: 10.3390/sports7050101.
 
12.
Czernia D, Szyk B. Air Density Calculator. 2022. Available from https://www.omnicalculator.com... physics/air-density (accessed June 22, 2024).
 
13.
Candau RB, Grappe F, Ménard M, Barbier B, Millet GY, Hoffman MD, Belli AR, Rouillon JD. Simplified deceleration method for assessment of resistive forces in cycling. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1999;31(10):1441–7; doi: 10.1097/00005768- 199910000-00013.
 
14.
Hermand E, Chabert C, Hue O. Ultra-endurance events in tropical environments and countermeasures to optimize performances and health. Int J Hyperthermia. 2019;36(1):753–60; doi: 10.1080/ 02656736.2019.1635718.
 
15.
Henriksen K, Stambulova N. The social environment of talent development in youth sport. Front Sports Act Living. 2023;5:1127151; doi: 10.3389/ fspor.2023.1127151.
 
16.
Turner AN, Bishop C, Cree J, Carr P, McCann A, Bartholomew B, Halsted L. Building a high-performance model for sport: a human developmentcentered approach. Strength Cond J. 2019;41(2): 100–7; doi: 10.1519/ssc.0000000000000447.
 
17.
Magnusson D, Stattin H. The Person in Context. A Holistic-Interactionistic Approach. In: Damon W, Lerner R (eds) Handbook of Child Psychology. 6th ed. Hoboken: Wiley and Sons; 2006, 400–464.
 
18.
Wu SS, Peiffer JJ, Brisswalter J, Nosaka K, Abbiss CR. Factors influencing pacing in triathlon. Open Access J Sports Med. 2014;5:223–34; doi: 10.2147/oajsm.S44392.
 
19.
Stiefel M, Knechtle B, Rüst C, Rosemann T. Analysis of performances at the ‘Ironman Hawaii triathlon’ and its qualifier events with respect to nationality. J Sci Cycling. 2023;2(2):27–34.
 
20.
Strzała M, Krężałek P, Kaca M, Głąb G, Ostrowski A, Stanula A, Tyka A. Swimming speed of the breaststroke kick. J Hum Kinet. 2012;35:133–9; doi: 10.2478/v10078-012-0087-4.
 
21.
Gay A, Zacca R, Abraldes JA, Morales-Ortíz E, López-Contreras G, Fernandes RJ, Arellano R. Swimming with swimsuit and wetsuit at typical vs. cold-water temperatures (26 vs. 18°C). Int J Sports Med. 2021;42(14):1305–12; doi: 10.1055/ a-1481-8473.
 
22.
Thuany M, Valero D, Villiger E, Andrade M, Weiss K, Nikolaidis P, Cuk I, Knechtle B. Where are the world’s fastest Ironman ® 70.3 race courses for professional athletes? J Sci Cycling. 2023; 12(1):35–47; doi: 10.28985/1223.jsc.05.
 
23.
Nikolaidis PT, Di Gangi S, Chtourou H, Rüst CA, Rosemann T, Knechtle B. The role of environmental conditions on marathon running performance in men competing in Boston marathon from 1897 to 2018. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019; 16(4); doi: 10.3390/ijerph16040614.
 
24.
PJAMM Cycling. Ironman Stonia – Tallinn 2023. Available from: https://pjammcycling.com/triat... 34.IRONMAN-Tallinn-Estonia (accessed March 10, 2024).
 
25.
Nowak BM, Ptak M, Stanek P. Influence of a lake on river water thermal regime: a case study of Lake Sławianowskie and the Kocunia River (Pomeranian Lakeland, North Poland). Meteorol Hydrol Water Manage. 2020;8(1):78–83; doi: 10.26491/ mhwm/115222.
 
26.
Barbosa TM, Costa MJ, Morais JE, Morouço P, Moreira M, Garrido ND, Marinho DA, Silva AJ. Characterization of speed fluctuation and drag force in young swimmers: a gender comparison. Hum Mov Sci. 2013;32(6):1214–25; doi: https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2012.07.009.
 
27.
Crouch TN, Burton D, LaBry ZA, Blair KB. Riding against the wind: a review of competition cycling aerodynamics. Sports Eng. 2017;20(2):81–110; doi: 10.1007/s12283-017-0234-1.
 
28.
Hoogkamer W, Taboga P, Kram R. Applying the cost of generating force hypothesis to uphill running. Peer J. 2014;2:e482; doi: 10.7717/peerj.482.
 
29.
Saycell J, Lomax M, Massey H, Tipton M. Scientific rationale for changing lower water temperature limits for triathlon racing to 12°C with wetsuits and 16°C without wetsuits. Br J Sports Med. 2018;52(11):702–8; doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2017- 098914.
 
30.
Beaumont F, Bogard F, Murer S, Polidori G, Madaci F, Taiar R. How does aerodynamics influence physiological responses in middle-distance running drafting? Math Modelling Eng Prob. 2019;6(1):129–35; doi: 10.18280/mmep.060117.
 
31.
Lepers R, Knechtle B, Stapley PJ. Trends in triathlon performance: effects of sex and age. Sports Med. 2013;43(9):851–63; doi: 10.1007/s40279- 013-0067-4.
 
32.
Heydenreich J, Kayser B, Schutz Y, Melzer K. Total energy expenditure, energy intake, and body composition in endurance athletes across the training season: a systematic review. Sports Med Open. 2017;3(1):8; doi: 10.1186/s40798-017-0076-1.
 
eISSN:1899-1955
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top