ORIGINAL PAPER
Home is the new gym: exergame as a potential tool to maintain adequate fitness levels also during quarantine
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Human Sciences, Society and Health, University of Cassino and Lazio Meridionale, Cassino, Italy
2
Department of Psychology, Educational Science and Human Movement, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
Submission date: 2020-03-19
Acceptance date: 2020-04-23
Publication date: 2020-05-09
Hum Mov. 2020;21(4):79-87
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Purpose:
With the coronavirus outbreak, the preventive measures include staying at home and isolation, increasing sedentary behaviours and risk for worsening of chronic diseases. To explore alternative forms of home-based physical activity, the study aim was to evaluate physiological (heart rate [HR], respiratory exchange ratio [RER], oxygen consumption [V̇O2], Energy expenditure [EE], metabolic equivalent task [MET]) and psychological (session rating of perceived exertion [sRPE], enjoyment) parameters of real (Zumba® class [ZC]) and exergame (Zumba® Fitness Rush [ZFR]) activities in relation to sex.
Methods:
Overall, 12 female (age: 24.7 ± 0.9 years) and 8 male (age: 25.3 ± 2.1 years) college students randomly performer 2 experimental 60-min sessions, ZC and ZFR, during which HR (expressed as percentage of individual maximal HR [%HRmax]), V̇O2, RER, MET and EE were measured. After each session, sRPE and Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale (PACES) were used to monitor exercise intensity and enjoyment, respectively.
Results:
Main effects for sex (p = 0.02) and modality (p < 0.0001) emerged for %HRmax, with women showing higher values than men and ZC showing higher values than ZFR. EE presented main effects for sex (p < 0.0001) and modality (p = 0.0002), with higher values in men and in ZC. Main effect (p = 0.0001) for modality emerged also for V̇O2 and MET, with higher values
in ZC regardless of sex. No significant differences were observed for RER, sRPE, or PACES.
Conclusions:
Although ZC elicited higher cardiovascular and metabolic responses, ZFR, classified as a moderate-to-vigorous activity, could be used to maintain regular physical activity in a safe home environment during the coronavirus crisis.
REFERENCES (17)
2.
American College of Sports Medicine. ACSM’s guidelines for exercise testing and prescription, 10th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2017.
3.
Bushman BA. Physical activity guidelines for Americans. The relationship between physical activity and health. ACSMs Health Fit J. 2019;23(3):5–9; doi: 10.1249/FIT.0000000000000472.
4.
Wang C, Horby PW, Hayden FG, Gao GF. A novel coronavirus outbreak of global health concern. Lancet. 2020;395(10223):470–473; doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736 (20)30185-9.
5.
Sohrabi C, Alsafi Z, O’Neill N, Khan M, Kerwan A, Al-Jabir A, et al. World Health Organization declares global emergency: a review of the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19). Int J Surg. 2020;76:71–76; doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.02.034.
6.
World Health Organization. Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) advice for the public. 2020. Available from:
https://www.who.int/emergencie.... 7. Chen P, Mao L, Nassis GP, Harmer P, Ainsworth BE, Li F. Coronavirus disease (COVID-19): the need to maintain regular physical activity while taking precautions. J Sport Health Sci. 2020;9(2):103–104; doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2020.02.001.
7.
Rizzo AS, Lange B, Suma EA, Bolas M. Virtual reality and interactive digital game technology: new tools to address obesity and diabetes. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2011;5(2):256–264; doi: 10.1177/193229681100500209.
8.
Warburton DER. The health benefits of active gaming: separating the myths from the virtual reality. Curr Cardiovasc Risk Rep. 2013;7:251–255; doi: 10.1007/ s12170-013-0322-0.
9.
Gao Z. Fight fire with fire? Promoting physical activity and health through active video games. J Sport Health Sci. 2017;6(1):1–3; doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2016.11.009.
10.
Graves LEF, Ridgers ND, Williams K, Stratton G, Atkinson G, Cable NT. The physiological cost and enjoyment of Wii Fit in adolescents, young adults, and older adults. J Phys Act Health. 2010;7(3):393–401; doi: 10.1123/jpah.7.3.393.
11.
McDonough DJ, Pope ZC, Zeng N, Lee JE, Gao Z. Comparison of college students’ energy expenditure, physical activity, and enjoyment during exergaming and traditional exercise. J Clin Med. 2018;7(11):433; doi: 10.3390/jcm7110433.
12.
Whitehead A, Johnston H, Nixon N, Welch J. Exergame effectiveness: what the numbers can tell us. Proc. 5th ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Video Games – Sandbox ’10. New York: ACM Press; 2010; 55–62; doi: 10.1145/1836135.1836144.
13.
Cortis C, Puggina A, Pesce C, Aleksovska K, Buck C, Burns C, et al. Psychological determinants of physical activity across the life course: a “DEterminants of DIet and Physical ACtivity” (DEDIPAC) umbrella systematic literature review. PLoS One. 2017;12(8):e0182709; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182709.
14.
Bailey BW, McInnins K. Energy cost of exergaming: a comparison of the energy cost of 6 forms of exergaming. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2011;165(7):597–602; doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2011.15.
15.
Tate DF, Lyons EJ, Valle CG. High-tech tools for exercise motivation: use and role of technologies such as the Internet, mobile applications, social media, and video games. Diabetes Spectr. 2015;28(1):45–54; doi: 10.2337/ diaspect.28.1.45.
16.
Giancotti GF, Fusco A, Rodio A, Capranica L, Cortis C. Energy expenditure and perceived exertion during active video games in relation to player mode and gender. Kinesiology. 2018;50(1):18–24; doi: 10.26582/k.50.1.3.
17.
Tietjen AMJ, Devereux GR. Physical demands of exergaming in healthy young adults. J Strength Cond Res.