ORIGINAL PAPER
The pacing of mixed martial arts sparring bouts: A secondary investigation with new analyses of previous data to support accelerometry as a potential method of monitoring pacing
 
More details
Hide details
1
College of Life and Natural Sciences, University of Derby, Derby, United Kingdom
 
2
Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom
 
3
University of Salford, Salford, United Kingdom
 
4
University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom
 
 
Submission date: 2019-08-16
 
 
Acceptance date: 2019-11-29
 
 
Publication date: 2020-06-18
 
 
Hum Mov. 2020;21(4):88-96
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Purpose:
Body-worn accelerometry has been shown to be reliable and used to measure the external load of mixed martial arts (MMA) via the Playerload metric. These measurements were only reported on a round-by-round basis, offering little indication of minute-by-minute load changes. Understanding these changes may provide a proxy measure of fatigue, readiness, and the onset of non-functional overreaching. It is also unclear as to what Playerload is measuring in MMA. This study was a secondary investigation of previously reported data to describe minute-by-minute changes in external load in MMA.

Methods:
Six male MMA competitors participated in a 3 × 5 minute sparring bout wearing a Catapult Minimax × 3, which recorded accumulated Playerload. The bouts were video-recorded. Time-motion analysis was used to determine: total active time; total inactive time; high-intensity time; low-intensity time; standing time; grounded time; striking time; non-striking time.

Results:
Bayesian repeated measures ANOVA found statistically relevant differences in accumulated Playerload for each minute of sparring (BF10 = 410) with no statistically relevant differences between winners and losers. Bayesian correlations revealed a direct, nearly perfect relationship between accumulated Playerload and total active time (r = 0.992, BF10 = 9,666). No other relationships between Playerload and time-motion analysis results were observed, despite Bayesian t-tests finding differences between standing time and grounded time (BF10 = 83.7), striking time and non-striking time (BF10 = 1,419).

Conclusions:
Playerload reflects overall active movement in MMA and measures active movement minute-by-minute changes but cannot distinguish between different modes or intensities of movement. This should be investigated further as a potential measure of fatigue and non-functional overreaching during MMA training.

REFERENCES (33)
1.
Abbiss CR, Laursen PB. Describing and understanding pacing strategies during athletic competition. Sports Med. 2008;38(3):239–252; doi: 10.2165/00007256- 200838030-00004.
 
2.
De Koning JJ, Foster C, Bakkum A, Kloppenburg S, Thiel C, Joseph T, et al. Regulation of pacing strategy during athletic competition. PLoS One. 2011;6(1): e15863; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015863.
 
3.
Tucker R, Lambert MI, Noakes TD. An analysis of pacing strategies during men’s world-record performances in track athletics. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2006;1(3):233–245; doi: 10.1123/ijspp.1.3.233.
 
4.
Tucker R. The anticipatory regulation of performance: the physiological basis for pacing strategies and the development of a perception-based model for exercise performance. Br J Sports Med. 2009;43(6):392–400; doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2008.050799.
 
5.
Waldron M, Highton J. Fatigue and pacing in high-intensity intermittent team sport: an update. Sports Med. 2014;44(12):1645–1658; doi: 10.1007/s40279-014- 0230-6.
 
6.
Antoniettô NR, Dal Bello F, Carrenho Queiroz AC, de Carvalho PHB, Brito CJ, Amtmann J, et al. Suggestions for professional mixed martial arts training with pacing strategy and technical-tactical actions by rounds. J Strength Cond Res. 2019; doi: 10.1519/JSC.00000 00000003018.
 
7.
Miarka B, Brito CJ, Amtmann J, Córdova C, dal Bello F, Camey S. Suggestions for judo training with pacing strategy and decision making by judo championship phases. J Hum Kinet. 2018;64:219–232; doi: 10.1515/ hukin-2017-0196.
 
8.
Chaabène H, Franchini E, Miarka B, Selmi MA, Mkaouer B, Chamari K. Time-motion analysis and physiological responses to karate official combat sessions: is there a difference between winners and defeated karatekas? Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2014;9(2): 302–308; doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2012-0353.
 
9.
Tabben M, Sioud R, Haddad M, Franchini E, Chaouachi A, Coquart J, et al. Physiological and perceived exertion responses during international karate kumite competition. Asian J Sports Med. 2013;4(4):263– 271; doi: 10.5812/asjsm.34246.
 
10.
Bridge CA, Jones MA, Drust B. Physiological responses and perceived exertion during international taekwondo competition. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2009; 4(4):485–493; doi: 10.1123/ijspp.4.4.485.
 
11.
Coswig VS, de P Ramos S, Del Vecchio FB. Time-motion and biological responses in simulated mixed martial arts sparring matches. J Strength Cond Res. 2016; 30(8):2156–2163; doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001340.
 
12.
Dos Santos DA, Miarka B, Dal Bello F, Carrenho Queiroz AC, de Carvalho PHB, Brito CJ, et al. 10 years on time-motion and motor actions of paired mixed martial arts athletes. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2019; 14(3):399–402; doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2018-0566.
 
13.
Dal Bello F, Brito CJ, Amtmann J, Miarka B. Ending MMA combat, specific grappling techniques according to the type of the outcome. J Hum Kinet. 2019;67:271– 280; doi: 10.2478/hukin-2018-0081.
 
14.
Worsey MTO, Espinosa HG, Shepherd JB, Thiel DV. Inertial sensors for performance analysis in combat sports: a systematic review. Sports. 2019;7(1):28; doi: 10.3390/sports7010028.
 
15.
Del Vecchio FB, Bartel C, Galliano LM, Fukuda DH. Accelerometry use to study external load in combat sports: an example from taekwondo. J Phy Fit Treatment & Sports. 2018;3(2):555608; doi: 10.19080/JPFMTS. 2018.03.555608.
 
16.
Hurst HT, Atkins S, Kirk C. Reliability of a portable accelerometer for measuring workload during mixed martial arts. J Athl Enhancement. 2014;3:5; doi: 10.4172/2324-9080.1000172.
 
17.
Kirk C, Hurst HT, Atkins S. Measuring the workload of mixed martial arts using accelerometry, time motion analysis and lactate. Int J Perform Anal Sport. 2015; 15(1):359–370; doi: 10.1080/24748668.2015.11868798.
 
18.
Meeusen R, Duclos M, Foster C, Fry A, Gleeson M, Nieman D, et al. Prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of the overtraining syndrome: joint consensus statement of the European College of Sport Science and the American College of Sports Medicine. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013;45(1):186–205; doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e318279 a10a.
 
19.
Nedergaard NJ, Robinson MA, Eusterwiemann E, Drust B, Lisboa PJ, Vanrenterghem J. The relationship between whole-body external loading and body-worn accelerometry during team-sport movements. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2017;12(1):18–26; doi: 10.1123/ijspp. 2015-0712.
 
20.
Edwards S, White S, Humphreys S, Robergs R, O’Dwyer N. Caution using data from triaxial accelerometers housed in player tracking units during running. J Sports Sci. 2019;37(7):810–818; doi: 10.1080/02640414. 2018.1527675.
 
21.
Verheul J, Gregson W, Lisboa P, Vanrenterghem J, Robinson MA. Mechanical load monitoring: can accelerometers really estimate whole-body stresses? XXVII Isokinetic Medical Group Conference, Barcelona, June 2018.
 
22.
Kirk C, Hurst HT, Atkins S. Comparison of the training loads of mixed martial arts techniques in isolated training and open sparring. J Combat Sports Martial Arts. 2015;1–2:1–6; doi: 10.5604/20815735.1174226.
 
23.
Wetzels R, Wagenmakers E-J. A default Bayesian hypothesis test for correlations and partial correlations. Psychon Bull Rev. 2012;19:1057–1064; doi: 10.3758/ s13423-012-0295-x.
 
24.
Hopkins WG. A scale of magnitudes for effect statistics. 2002. Available from: http://sportsci.org/resource/s... effectmag.html.
 
25.
Field A. Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics, 4th ed. London: Sage; 2013.
 
26.
Knudson D. Significant and meaningful effects in sports biomechanics research. Sports Biomech. 2009;8(1): 96–104; doi: 10.1080/14763140802629966.
 
27.
Roe G, Halkier M, Beggs C, Till K, Jones B. The use of accelerometers to quantify collisions and running demands of rugby union match-play. Int J Perform Anal Sport. 2016;16(2):590–601; doi: 10.1080/24748668. 2016.11868911.
 
28.
Gastin PB, McLean OC, Breed RVP, Spittle M. Tackle and impact detection in elite Australian football using wearable microsensor technology. J Sports Sci. 2014; 32(10):947–953; doi: 10.1080/02640414.2013.868920.
 
29.
Grainger A, McMahon JJ, Comfort P. Assessing the frequency and magnitude of match impacts accrued during an elite rugby union playing season. Int J Perform Anal Sport. 2018;18(4):507–522; doi: 10.1080/24748668.2018. 1496392. Kirk C. Does anthropometry influence technical factors in competitive mixed martial arts? Hum Mov. 2018;19(2):46–59; doi: 10.5114/hm.2018.74059.
 
30.
Gabbett TJ. Relationship between accelerometer load, collisions, and repeated high-intensity effort activity in rugby league players. J Strength Cond Res. 2015; 29(12):3424–3431; doi: 10.1519/JSC.000000000000 1017.
 
31.
Wagenmakers E-J, Verhagen J, Ly A, Bakker M, Lee MD, Matzke D, et al. A power fallacy. Behav Res Methods. 2015;47(4):913–917; doi: 10.3758/s13428-014-0517-4.
 
32.
Andreato LV, Follmer B, Celidonio CL, da Silva Honorato A. Brazilian jiu-jitsu combat among different categories: time-motion and physiology. A systematic review. Strength Cond J. 2016;38(6):44–54; doi: 10.1519/SSC. 0000000000000256.
 
33.
Slimani M, Chaabène H, Davis P, Franchini E, Cheour F, Chamari K. Performance aspects and physiological responses in male amateur boxing competitions: a brief review. J Strength Cond Res. 2017;31(4):1132–1141; doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001643.
 
eISSN:1899-1955
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top