ORIGINAL PAPER
Menarche, somatic maturity, and physical fitness in Portuguese girls: an intergenerational analysis based on the Mirwald equation
More details
Hide details
1
Applied Research Institute, Polytechnic University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
2
Sport Physical Activity and Health Research and Innovation Center, Coimbra, Portugal
3
Department of Sports and Well-being – Polytechnic Institute of Castelo Branco, Castelo Branco, Portugal
4
SPRINT Sport Physical Activity and Health Research and Innovation Center, Castelo Branco, Portugal
5
Instituto Politécnico de Setúbal, Escola Superior de Educação, Setúbal, Portugal
6
Centro de Investigação e Inovação em Desporto Atividade Física e Saúde, Rio Maior, Portugal
7
Life Quality Research Center (CIEQV), Instituto Politécnico de Setúbal, Setúbal, Portugal
8
Comprehensive Health Research Centre, Universidade de Évora, Évora, Portugal
9
Interdisciplinary Center for the Study of Human Performance (CIPER), Faculdade de Motricidade Humana, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
10
Department of Physical Education and Sports, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
Submission date: 2025-09-12
Acceptance date: 2025-11-27
Online publication date: 2026-03-03
Corresponding author
Ana Filipa Silva
Sport Physical Activity and Health Research and Innovation Center, Polytechnic
University of Coimbra, Rua da Misericórdia, Lagar dos Cortiços – S. Martinho do Bispo; 3045-093 Coimbra, Portugal
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Purpose:
This study aimed to assess age at menarche in Portuguese girls and compare it with their mothers, examine its association with somatic maturity estimated by the Mirwald equation, and characterise physical fitness in pre- and post-pubertal girls.
Material and methods:
71 Portuguese girls (10–13 years, post-menarche) completed a questionnaire on menarcheal age (self and mothers), anthropometric assessments (height, sitting height, body mass, waist circumference), and physical fitness tests (handgrip, isometric mid-thigh pull, 3-min Kasch Pulse Recovery Test). Somatic maturity was estimated with the Mirwald equation. Analyses included paired and independent t-tests, effect sizes, correlations, and agreement (Bland–Altman, Lin’s CCC).
Results:
Pre-PHV girls had negative maturity offset values (–0.58 ± 0.62 years), while post-PHV girls were beyond PHV (1.28 ± 0.91 years). Mean age at menarche was 10.87 ± 0.93 years, significantly earlier than their mothers (12.00 ± 1.44 years; mean difference = –1.09, p < 0.001). Post-PHV girls showed higher absolute strength (handgrip right: 18.86 ± 3.68 vs. 12.74 ± 3.10 kg, d = 1.72; IMTP: 63.46 ± 12.54 vs. 45.58 ± 11.93 kg, d = 1.44), while relative strength differences were smaller (handgrip: 0.35 ± 0.08 vs. 0.30 ± 0.09 kg/kg, d = 0.67). Endurance did not differ. The Mirwald equation underestimated years since menarche by 0.94 ± 1.10, with weak agreement (Lin’s CCC = 0.37).
Conclusions:
Biological maturation strongly influenced absolute strength, largely explained by body size. Relative strength and maturity offset-based estimates of years since menarche showed weaker validity, highlighting the need for refined prediction models.
REFERENCES (28)
1.
Sullivan J, Roberts SJ, Mckeown J, Littlewood M, McLaren-Towlson C, Andrew M, Enright K. Methods to predict the timing and status of biological maturation in male adolescent soccer players: a narrative systematic review. PLOS ONE. 2023;18(9):e0286768; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286768.
2.
Tsutsui T, Iizuka S, Sakamaki W, Maemichi T, Torii S. Growth until peak height velocity occurs rapidly in early maturing adolescent boys. Children. 2022;9(10):1570; doi: 10.3390/children9101570.
3.
Gårdstedt-Berghog J, Niklasson A, Sjöberg A, Aronson AS, Pivodic A, Nierop AFM, Albertsson-Wikland K, Holmgren A. Timing of menarche and pubertal growth patterns using the QEPS growth model. Front Pediatr. 2024;12; doi: 10.3389/fped.2024.1438042.
4.
Papadimitriou A. The Evolution of the age at menarche from prehistorical to modern times. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2016;29(6):527–30; doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2015.12.002.
5.
Queiroga AC, Silva RS, Santos AC, Maia I, Barros H. Secular trend in age at menarche in women in Portugal born between 1920 and 1992: results from three population-based studies. Am J Hum Biol. 2020;32(5); doi: 10.1002/ajhb.23392.
6.
Mirwald RL, G. Baxter-Jones AD, Bailey DA, Beunen GP. An assessment of maturity from anthropometric measurements. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002;34(4):689–94; doi: 10.1097/00005768-200204000-00020.
7.
Moore SA, Mckay HA, Macdonald H, Nettlefold L, Baxter-Jones ADG, Cameron N, Brasher PMA. Enhancing a somatic maturity prediction model. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015;47(8):1755–64; doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000588.
8.
Malina RM, Kozieł SM, Králik M, Chrzanowska M, Suder A. Prediction of maturity offset and age at peak height velocity in a longitudinal series of boys and girls. Am J Hum Biol. 2021;33(6); doi: 10.1002/ajhb.23551.
9.
Malina RM, Coelho-e-Silva MJ, Martinho DV, Sousa-e-Siva P, Figueiredo AJ, Cumming SP, Králík M, Kozieł SM. Observed and predicted ages at peak height velocity in soccer players. PLOS ONE. 2021;16(7):e0254659; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254659.
10.
Towlson C, Salter J, Ade JD, Enright K, Harper LD, Page RM, Malone JJ. Maturity-associated considerations for training load, injury risk, and physical performance in youth soccer: one size does not fit all. J Sport Health Sci. 2021;10(4):403–12; doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2020.09.003.
11.
Moeskops S, Oliver JL, Read PJ, Cronin JB, Myer GD, Haff GG, Lloyd RS. Within- and between-session reliability of the isometric midthigh pull in young female athletes. J Strength Cond Res. 2018;32(7):1892–901; doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002566.
12.
Yapici H, Gulu M, Yagin FH, Eken O, Gabrys T, Knappova V. Exploring the relationship between biological maturation level, muscle strength, and muscle power in adolescents. Biology. 11(12):1722; doi: 10.3390/biology11121722.
13.
Radnor JM, Staines J, Bevan J, Cumming SP, Kelly AL, Lloyd RS, Oliver JL. Maturity has a greater association than relative age with physical performance in english male academy soccer players. Sports. 2021;9(12):171; doi: 10.3390/sports9120171.
14.
Xu H, Wang X, Xiao W, Xie Y, Zhang X, Xu S, Wan Y, Tao F. Comparison between grip strength and relative grip strength in their relationship with allostatic load among adolescents. BMC Public Health. 2024;24:2596; doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20129-0.
15.
Charbonnet B, Sieghartsleitner R, Schmid J, Zuber C, Zibung M, Conzelmann A. Maturity-based correction mechanism for talent identification: when is it needed, does it work, and does it help to better predict who will make it to the pros?. J Sports Sci Med. 2022;21(4):640–57.
16.
Rollo S, Fraser BJ, Seguin N, Sampson M, Lang JJ, Tomkinson GR, Tremblay MS. Health-related criterion-referenced cut-points for cardiorespiratory fitness among youth: a systematic review. Sports Med. 2022;52:101–22; doi: 10.1007/s40279-021-01537-3.
17.
Jankowski M, Niedzielska A, Brzezinski M, Drabik J. cardiorespiratory fitness in children: a simple screening test for population studies. Pediatr Cardiol. 2015;36(1):27–32; doi: 10.1007/s00246-014-0960-0.
18.
Armstrong N, McManus AM. Physiology of elite young male athletes. In: Armstrong N, McManus AM (eds.). The Elite Young Athlete. Basel: Karger AG; 2011, pp. 1–22; doi: 10.1159/000320618.
19.
Ersoy B, Balkan C, Gunay T, Egemen A. The factors affecting the relation between the menarcheal age of mother and daughter. Child Care Health Dev. 2005;31(3):303–8; doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2005.00501.x.
20.
Dos’Santos T, Thomas C, Comfort P, McMahon JJ, Jones PA, Oakley NP, Young AL. Between-session reliability of isometric midthigh pull kinetics and maximal power clean performance in male youth soccer players. J Strength Cond Res. 2018;32(12):3364–72; doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001830.
21.
Drenowatz C, Greier K. Association of biological maturation with the development of motor competence in Austrian middle school students – a 3-year observational study. Transl Pediatr. 2019;8(5):402–11; doi: 10.21037/tp.2019.09.03.
22.
Comfort P, Jones PaulA, McMahon JJ, Newton R. Effect of knee and trunk angle on kinetic variables during the isometric midthigh pull: test–retest reliability. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2015;10(1):58–63; doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2014-0077.
23.
Merrigan JJ, Stone JD, Hornsby WG, Hagen JA. Identifying reliable and relatable force–time metrics in athletes – considerations for the isometric mid-thigh pull and countermovement jump. Sports. 2020;9(1):4; doi: 10.3390/sports9010004.
24.
Fonseca NM, Marques DL, Pereira RM, Marques MC, Esteves DL, Marinho DA, Pereira Neiva HP. Physical performance differences between young Portuguese male and female basketball players according to chronological and biological age. Sport Sci Health. 2025 Sep 20;21(3):1783–92; doi: 10.1007/s11332-025-01410-0.
25.
Retzepis NO, Avloniti A, Kokkotis C, Stampoulis T, Balampanos D, Gkachtsou A, Aggelakis P, Kelaraki D, Protopapa M, Pantazis D, Emmanouilidou M, Zaras N, Draganidis D, Smilios I, Kambas A, Fatouros IG, Michalopoulou M, Chatzinikolaou A. The effect of peak height velocity on strength and power development of young athletes: a scoping review. J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2025;10(2):168; doi: 10.3390/jfmk10020168.
26.
Malina RM, Martinho DV, Valente-dos-Santos J, Coelho-e-Silva MJ, Kozieł SM. Growth and maturity status of female soccer players: a narrative review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(4):1448; doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041448.
27.
Malina RM, Choh AC, Czerwinski SA, Chumlea WmC. Validation of maturity offset in the fels longitudinal study. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2016;28(3):439–55; doi: 10.1123/pes.2015-0090.
28.
Myburgh GK, Cumming SP, Malina RM. Cross-sectional analysis investigating the concordance of maturity status classifications in elite caucasian youth tennis players. Sports Med Open. 2019;5(1):27; doi: 10.1186/s40798-019-0198-8.