ORIGINAL PAPER
Anaerobic power as a key predictor of performance in elite kayaking
More details
Hide details
1
Faculty of Physical Education and Sport at Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
2
Czech Technical University, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Prague, Czech Republic
3
Sports Research Institute of the Czech Armed Forces, Prague, Czech Republic
Submission date: 2025-03-12
Acceptance date: 2025-06-03
Online publication date: 2025-09-11
Corresponding author
Miroslava Nováková
Sports Research Institute of the Czech Armed Forces, Prague, Czech Republic
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Purpose:
The balance of low- and high-intensity training, reflecting aerobic and anaerobic capacities, respectively, varies by sport and discipline. Yet their specific contributions in male flat-water kayaking remain poorly understood. This study aimed to describe the relationship of anthropometric parameters and aerobic and anaerobic indicators to the performance of elite flat-water kayakers.
Methods:
Twenty-five male elite kayakers were categorised into national and international competition levels. For aerobic capacity, maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) was measured using spiroergometry, while anaerobic capacity was assessed using the Wingate upper arm test, determining relative peak power (PP) and relative mean power (MP) in W/kg. Concurrently, blood lactate concentrations were measured post-exercise.
Results:
No significant differences were determined in anthropometric parameters and VO2max from the spiroergometry between the national- and international-level kayakers. However, the Wingate upper arm test results revealed that international kayakers, including an Olympic champion, exhibited significantly higher maximal power output, represented here by PP (10.43 ± 0.80 W/kg) compared to their national counterparts (9.69 ± 0.52 W/kg). Moreover, significant positive correlations were found between PP and MP with the blood lactate concentration post-exercise.
Conclusions:
The findings suggest that the ability to generate maximal power output and maintain high-intensity anaerobic power might be the decisive factors determining the top elite performance in flat-water kayaking, especially at shorter race distances. The study’s results highlight the critical balance between anaerobic and aerobic capacities in elite flat-water kayaking and encourage coaches to incorporate targeted training regimens to enhance anaerobic strength.
REFERENCES (24)
1.
Michael JS, Rooney KB, Smith R. The metabolic demands of kayaking: a review. J Sports Sci Med. 2008;7(1):1–7.
2.
Tesch PA, Piehl K, Wilson G, Karlsson J. Physiological characteristics of elite kayak paddlers. Can J Appl Sport Sci. 1983;8(2):87–93.
3.
Bishop D. Physiological predictors of flat-water kayak performance in women. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2000;82(1–2):91–7; doi: 10.1007/s004210050656.
4.
Diachenko A, Rusanova O, Huang Z, Gao X, Guo J, Ye C. Functional and physical capacity indicators of kayakers racing 1000, 500, and 200 m distances: a randomized study. J Phys Educ Sport. 2021;21(3):1325–30; doi: 10.7752/jpes.2021.03168.
5.
Buglione A, Lazzer S, Colli R, Introini E, Di Prampero PE. Energetics of best performances in elite kayakers and canoeists. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010;42(12):2128–34; doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013 e3181fdfdb7.
6.
Van Someren KA, Howatson G. Prediction of flatwater kayaking performance. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2008;3(2):207–18; doi: 10.1123/ijspp.3. 2.207.
7.
Carey DG, Richardson MT. Can aerobic and anaerobic power be measured in a 60-second maximal test?. J Sports Sci Med. 2003;2(4):151–7.
8.
Heller J, Kinkorova I, Vodicka P, Nikolaidis PT, Balko S. Force-velocity relationship in cycling and arm cranking: a comparison of men and women. J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2023;8(4):151; doi: 10.3390/jfmk8040151.
9.
Papandreou A, Philippou A, Zacharogiannis E, Maridaki M. Physiological adaptations to highintensity interval and continuous training in kayak athletes. J Strength Cond Res. 2019;33(4):1051– 60; doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002710.
10.
Du G, Tao T. Effects of a paddling-based high-intensity interval training prescribed using anaerobic speed reserve on sprint kayak performance. Front Physiol. 2023;13:1077172; doi: 10.3389/ fphys.2022.1077172.
11.
Matzka M, Zinner C, Kunz P, Holmberg HC, Sperlich B. Comparison of physiological parameters during on-water and ergometer kayaking and their relationship to performance in sprint kayak competitions. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2021;16(7): 958–64; doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2019-0912.
12.
Sitkowski D, Starczewski M, Klusiewicz A. Reference levels of mean and peak anaerobic power for male and female long-track speed skaters. Biol Sport. 2025;42(2):207–13; doi: 10.5114/biolsport. 2025.144407.
13.
Buttar KK, Saboo N, Kacker S. A review: maximal oxygen uptake (VO2 max) and its estimation methods. Int J Phys Educ Sports Health. 2019; 6(6):24–32.
14.
Grant JA, Joseph AN, Campagna PD. The prediction of VO2max: a comparison of 7 indirect tests of aerobic power. J Strength Cond Res. 1999;13(4): 346–52; doi: 10.1519/00124278-199911000-00 008.
15.
Van Hall G. Lactate kinetics in human tissues at rest and during exercise. Acta Physiol. 2010;199(4): 499–508; doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.2010.02122.x.
16.
Swart J, Jennings CL. Use of blood lactate concentration as a marker of training status: review article. S Afr J Sports Med. 2004;16(3):1–5.
17.
Jackson AS, Pollock ML. Generalized equations for predicting body density of men. Br J Nutr. 1978;40(3):497–504; doi: 10.1079/bjn19780152.
18.
Wasserman K, Hansen JE, Sue DY, Stringer WW, Whipp BJ. Principles of Exercise Testing and Interpretation. Including Pathophysiology and Clinical Applications. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2011.
19.
Kukic F, Petrović M, Greco G, Cataldi S, Fischetti F. Association of anthropometrics and body composition with maximal and relative force and power of kayak stroke in competitive kayak athletes. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(5): 2977; doi: 10.3390/ijerph19052977.
20.
Diafas V, Dimakopoulou E, Diamanti V, Zelioti D, Kaloupsis S. Anthropometric characteristics and somatotype of Greek male and female flatwater kayak athletes. Biomed Hum Kinet. 2011;3:111– 4; doi: 10.2478/v10101-011-0024-3.
21.
Beneke R, Pollmann CH, Bleif I, Leithäuser R, Hütler M. How anaerobic is the Wingate Anaerobic Test for humans?. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2002;87 (4–5):388–92; doi: 10.1007/s00421-002-0622-4.
22.
Messonnier L, Freund CH, Denis C, Dormois D, Dufour A-B, Lacour J-R. Time to exhaustion at VO2max is related to the lactate exchange and removal abilities. Int J Sports Med. 2002;23(6): 433–8; doi: 10.1055/s-2002-33740.
23.
Mastalerz A, Johne M, Mróz A, Bojarczuk A, Stastny P, Petr M, Kolinger D, Pisz A, Vostatkova P, Maculewicz E. Changes of anaerobic power and lactate concentration following intense glycolytic efforts in elite and sub-elite 400-meter sprinters. J Hum Kinet. 2024; 91(Spec Issue): 165–74; doi: 10.5114/jhk/186074.
24.
Paquette M, Bieuzen F, Billaut F. The effect of HIIT vs. SIT on muscle oxygenation in trained sprint kayakers. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2021;121(10):2743– 59; doi: 10.1007/s00421-021-04743-z.