ORIGINAL PAPER
Impact of ball possession time and number of passes on the efficiency of scoring in men’s water polo
 
More details
Hide details
1
Division of Aquatic Sports, School of Physical Education and Sports Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
 
2
Sports Science Department, Aspire Academy, Doha, Qatar
 
 
Submission date: 2021-08-09
 
 
Acceptance date: 2022-03-13
 
 
Publication date: 2022-04-11
 
 
Hum Mov. 2023;24(2):18-24
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Purpose:
This study aimed to explore whether a meaningful relationship existed between scoring in men’s water polo and ball possession time and the number of passes in even and extra player offence conditions.

Methods:
Overall, 24 close matches played during international competitions were analysed twice, for the winning and losing teams separately. This allowed to collect a sample consisting of 1588 offences when teams played in equal conditions and 492 with an extra player.

Results:
For effective scoring in even conditions, the results demonstrated significant relationships between the exchanging of many passes (7.78 ± 1.09 passes) and short-duration attacks lasting for 1–10 s (7.87 ± 2.29 s) (p = 0.05). In the extra player condition, a considerable relationship was noted between short to average ball possession time and scoring (p = 0.05). However, the effect size for these differences ranged from moderate to low.

Conclusions:
Knowledge of this study results could help coaches design specific workouts during routine practices and make decisions during matches.

REFERENCES (27)
1.
Dopsaj M, Matkovic I. The structure of technical and tactical activities of water polo players in the first Yugoslav league during the game. In: Keskinen KL, Komi PV, Holander AP (eds.), Biomechanics and medicine in swimming VIII. Jyväskylä: Department of Biology of Physical Activity, University of Jyväskylä; 1999; 435–438.
 
2.
Lupo C, Tessitore A, Minganti C, Capranica L. Notational analysis of elite and sub-elite water polo matches. J Strength Cond Res. 2010;24(1):223–229; doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181c27d36.
 
3.
McInnes SE, Carlson JS, Jones CJ, McKenna MJ. The physiological load imposed on basketball players during competition. J Sports Sci. 1995;13(5):387–397; doi: 10.1080/02640419508732254.
 
4.
Platanou T, Thanopoulos V. Time analysis of the goalkeepers’ movements in water polo. Kinesiology. 2002;34(1):94–102.
 
5.
Platanou T. Time motion analysis of international level water polo players. J Hum Mov Stud. 2004;46(4):319–331.
 
6.
Platanou T, Geladas N. The influence of game duration and playing position on intensity of exercise during match-play in elite water polo players. J Sports Sci. 2006;24(11):1173–1181; doi: 10.1080/02640410500457794.
 
7.
Reilly T, Thomas V. A motion analysis of work rate in different positional roles in professional football matchplay. J Hum Mov Stud. 1976;2(2):87–97.
 
8.
Fédération Internationale de Natation. FINA water polo rules – valid from 12.03.2020. Available at: https://www.fina.org/water-pol....
 
9.
Hook C, Hughes M. Patterns of play leading to shots in Euro 2000. In: Hughes M, Franks I (eds.), Pass.Com. Cardiff: Center for Performance Analysis, UWIC; 2001;295–302.
 
10.
Lago-Peñas C, Dellal A. Ball possession strategies in elite soccer according to the evolution of the match-score: the influence of situational variables. J Hum Kinet. 2010;25:93–100; doi: 0.2478/v10078-010-0036-z.
 
11.
Jones PD, James N, Mellalieu SD. Possession as a performance indicator in soccer. Int J Perform Anal Sport. 2004;4(1):98–102; doi: 10.1080/24748668.2004.11868295.
 
12.
Stanhope J. An investigation into possession with respect to time, in the Soccer World Cup 1994. In: Hughes MD (ed.), National analysis of sport III. Cardiff: UWIC; 2001; 155–162.
 
13.
Lupo C, Tessitore A. How important is the final outcome to interpret match analysis data: the influence of scoring a goal, and difference between close and balance games in elite soccer: comment on Lago-Penas and Gomez-Lopez (2014). Percept Mot Skills. 2016;122(1):280–285; doi: 10.1177/0031512515626629.
 
14.
Lago-Peñas C, Gómez-López M. How important is it to score a goal? The influence of the scoreline on match performance in elite soccer. Percept Mot Skills. 2014;119(3):774–784; doi: 10.2466/23.27.PMS.119c32z1.
 
15.
Melchiorri G, Castagna C, Sorge R, Bonifazi M. Game activity and blood lactate in men’s elite water-polo players. J Strength Cond Res. 2010;24(10):2647–2651; doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181e3486b.
 
16.
Melchiorri G, Viero V, Tancredi V, Del Bianco R, Bonifazi M. Actual playing time of water polo players in relation to the field position. J Hum Kinet. 2020;73:241–249; doi: 10.2478/hukin-2019-0148.
 
17.
Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
 
18.
Lupo C, Capranica L, Cugliari G, Gomez MA, Tessitore A. Tactical swimming activity and heart rate aspects of youth water polo game. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2016;56(9):997–1006.
 
19.
Bate R. Football chance: tactics and strategy. In: Reilly T, Lees A, Davids K, Murphy W (eds.), Science and football. London: E & FN Spon; 1988; 293–301.
 
20.
Araya J, Larkin P. Key performance variables between the top 10 and bottom 10 teams in the English Premier League 2012/13 season. University of Sydney Papers in HMHCE. 2013;2:17–29.
 
21.
Rampinini E, Impellizzeri FM, Castagna C, Coutts AJ, Wisløff U. Technical performance during soccer matches of the Italian Serie A league: effect of fatigue and competitive level. J Sci Med Sport. 2009;12(1):227–233; doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2007.10.002.
 
22.
Gómez MÁ, Tsamourtzis E, Lorenzo A. Defensive systems in basketball ball possessions. Int J Perform Anal Sport. 2006;6(1):98–107; doi: 10.1080/24748668.2006.11868358.
 
23.
Ortega E, Cárdenas D, Sainz de Baranda P, Palao JM. Analysis of the final actions used in basketball during formative years according to player’s position. J Hum Mov Stud. 2006;50(4):421–437.
 
24.
Ortega E, Cárdenas D, Sainz de Baranda MP, Palao JM. Differences in competitive participation according to player’s position in formative basketball. J Hum Mov Stud. 2006;50(2):103–122.
 
25.
Gómez MA, Lorenzo A, Ibañez SJ, Ortega E, Leite N, Sampaio J. An analysis of defensive strategies used by home and away basketball teams. Percept Mot Skills. 2010;110(1):159–166; doi: 10.2466/PMS.110.1.159-166.
 
26.
Mexas K, Tsitskaris G, Kyriakou D, Garefis A. Comparison of effectiveness of organized offences between two different championships in high level basketball. Int J Perform Anal Sport. 2005;5(1):72–82; doi: 10.1080/24748668.2005.11868317.
 
27.
Gómez M-A, Lorenzo A, Ibañez S-J, Sampaio J. Ball possession effectiveness in men’s and women’s elite basketball according to situational variables in different game periods. J Sports Sci. 2013;31(14):1578–1587; doi: 10.1080/02640414.2013.792942.
 
eISSN:1899-1955
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top