ORIGINAL PAPER
Relationship between offensive tactical efficiency and technical actions performed by school futsal players
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Physical Education, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil
 
2
Department of Physical Education, State University of Maringá, Maringá, Brazil
 
3
Department of Physical Education, State University of Londrina, Londrina, Brazil
 
 
Submission date: 2022-04-09
 
 
Acceptance date: 2023-02-22
 
 
Publication date: 2023-07-17
 
 
Hum Mov. 2023;24(3):71-77
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Purpose:
The aim was to analyse the significance and magnitude of the correlation between the offensive tactical efficiency and technical actions performed by schoolchildren practicing futsal during a reduced game in the GR3-3GR test format.

Methods:
The sample was composed of 33 child and adolescent futsal players aged between 9 and 14 years – from elementary and middle schools – and divided into Under-10 (21 players), Under-12 (6 players), and Under-14 (6 players) categories. The players were filmed during the execution of a small-sided game (GR3-3GR). To assess tactical efficiency, core tactical principles of penetration, offensive coverage, depth mobility, width and length (with and without ball), and offensive unit were observed through the FUT-SAT test, while technical actions were analysed using an observational protocol, which recorded the occurrence of the actions ‘passing’, ‘shooting’, ‘receiving’, and ‘1:1 duel’. Spearman’s correlation coefficient was used to verify the degree of relationship of the analysed variables, followed by correlation-based network analysis. Significance was set at 5%.

Results:
The results showed associations between efficiency in the execution of offensive tactical principles performed by the attacker with the ball and the execution of technical actions. The principle ‘penetration’ was positively correlated with ‘receiving’ (r = 0.41), and the principle ‘width and length with ball’ was negatively correlated with the execution of ‘1×1 duel’ (r = –0.34).

Conclusions:
It is concluded that the technical quality when receiving and controlling the ball favours movements related to progression on the playing court. Players who are less skilled in direct confrontations tend to prefer to carry the ball to spaces with less adversary pressure.

REFERENCES (28)
1.
Beato M, Coratella G, Schena F. Brief review of the state of art in futsal. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2014;56(4): 428–432.
 
2.
Garganta J, Gréhaigne J. Systemic approach in football: vogue or necessity? [in Portuguese]. Movimento. 1999; 5(10):40–50; doi: 10.22456/1982-8918.2457.
 
3.
Gréhaigne J-F, Godbout P. Dynamic systems theory and team sport coaching. Quest. 2014;66(1):96–116; doi: 10.1080/00336297.2013.814577.
 
4.
Rechenchosky L, Menegassi V, Borges P, Praça G, Greco P, Oliveira A, et al. Decision making in soccer: interactions with physical and technical performance. J Exerc Physiol. 2017;20(3):122–129.
 
5.
Cavichiolli FR, Cheluchinhak AB, Capraro AM, Marchi Jr W, Mezzadri FM. Formation process of indoor and outdoor soccer athletes: an ethnographical analysis [in Portuguese]. Rev Bras Educ Fis Esporte. 2011;25(4): 631–647; doi: 10.1590/S1807-55092011000400008.
 
6.
Silva GHO, Marques PG, Codonhato R, Borges PH. Analysis of the execution of defensive tactical principles among students practicing futsal [in Portuguese]. Rev Bras Futs Fut. 2019;11(45):490–496.
 
7.
Greco PJ, Benda R. Universal sports initiation: from motor learning to technical training [in Portuguese]. UFMG: Belo Horizonte; 1998.
 
8.
Kröger C, Roth K, Memmert D. School of the Ball: An ABC for Beginners in Sports Games [in Portuguese]. Phorte: Săo Paulo; 2002.
 
9.
Rink J. Teaching Physical Education for Learning. McGraw-Hill Higher Education: Boston; 2010.
 
10.
Teodorescu L. Problems of Theory and Methodology in Sports Games [in Portuguese]. Livros Horizontes: Lisbon; 1984.
 
11.
Praça GM, Greco PJ. Tactical Training in Soccer: Theory and Practice [in Portuguese]. Appris: Curitiba; 2020.
 
12.
Américo HB, Kowalski M, Cardoso F, Kunrath CA, González-Víllora S, Teoldo I. Difference in declarative tactical knowledge between U-11 and U-15 soccer players. Hum Mov. 2017;18(5):25–30; doi: 10.1515/ HUMO-2017-0045.
 
13.
Reis M, Santos J, Matos M, Cruz T, Vasconcellos F, Almeida M. Assessment of the performance of novice futsal players in the execution of futsal-specific motor skills. Hum Mov. 2019;20(3):29–37; doi: 10.5114/ hm.2019.83994.
 
14.
Ueda LSC, Menegassi VM, Avelar A, Rechenchosky L, Silva FLO, Borges PH. Analysis of the execution of core tactical principles and technical efficiency of primary school futsal players. Rev Bras Cineantropom Desempenho Hum. 2020;22(2):22:e65221; doi: 10.1590/ 1980-0037.2020v22e65221.
 
15.
Praça GM, Soares VV, Matias CJAS, Teoldo I, Greco PJ. Relationship between tactical and technical performance in youth soccer players. Rev Bras Cineantropom Desempenho Hum. 2015;17(2):136–144; doi: 10.5007/ 1980-0037.2015v17n2p136.
 
16.
Voser RC, Giusti, JGM. Futsal and School: A Pedagogical Perspective [in Portuguese]. 1st ed. Artmed: Porto Alegre, Brazil; 2002.
 
17.
Teoldo I, Garganta J, Greco PJ, Mesquita I, Maia J. System of tactical assessment in Soccer (FUT-SAT): Development and preliminary validation. Motricidade. 2011;7(1):69–83; doi: 10.6063/motricidade.121.
 
18.
Bayer C. Teaching Team Sports [in Portuguese]. Dina Livros: Lisbon; 1994.
 
19.
Teoldo I, Garganta J, Greco PJ, Mesquita I. Tactical principles of the soccer game: concepts and application [in Portuguese]. Motriz. 2009;15(3),657–668.
 
20.
Teoldo I, Guilherme J, Garganta, J. For a Football Played with Ideas [in Portuguese]. 1st ed. Apris: Curitiba; 2015.
 
21.
González-Víllora S, Serra-Olivares J, Pastor-Vicedo, JC, Teoldo I. Review of the tactical evaluation tools for youth players, assessing the tactics in team sports: football. Springerplus. 2015;4:633; doi: 10.1186/s40064-015- 1462-0.
 
22.
Maarseveen MV, Oudejans R, Savelsbergh G. System for notational analysis in small-sided soccer games. Int J Sports Sci Coach. 2017;12(2):194–206; doi: 10.1177/1747954117694922.
 
23.
Almeida C, Volossovitch A, Duarte R. Influence of scoring mode and age group on passing actions during smallsided and conditioned soccer games. Hum Mov. 2017; 18(5):125–34; doi: 10.5114/HM.2017.73621.
 
24.
Hevey D. Network analysis: a brief overview and tutorial. Health Psychol Behav Med. 2018;6(1):301–28; doi: 10.1080/21642850.2018.1521283.
 
25.
Teoldo I, Garganta J, Greco P, Mesquita I, Muller E, Silva B, et al. Comparing tactical behaviours of youth soccer teams through the test “GK3-3GK”. Open Sports Sci J. 2010;3:58–61; doi: 10.2174/1875399X01003010 0058.
 
26.
Müller E, Garganta J, Santos RMM, Teoldo I. Tactical behaviour and performance: comparative study between soccer and futsal players [in Portuguese]. Rev Bras Cienc Mov. 2016;24(2):100–109.
 
27.
Carneiro ML, Reis MAM, Petiot GH, Silva TCA. Analysis of patterns of ball recovery in youth futsal. Hum Mov. 2021;22(3):84–91; doi: 10.5114/hm.2021.100327.
 
28.
Borges PH, Guilherme J, Rechenchosky L, Costa LCA, Rinadi W. Fundamental tactical principles of soccer: a comparison of different age groups. J Hum Kinet. 2017;58:207–214; doi: 10.1515/hukin-2017-0078.
 
eISSN:1899-1955
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top