ORIGINAL PAPER
Effects of an implicit-explicit hybrid learning model on handball tactical knowledge
 
More details
Hide details
1
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
 
2
Aeronautical Instruction and Adaptation Centre, Lagoa Santa, Brazil
 
3
Federal University of Viçosa, Florestal, Brazil
 
 
Submission date: 2021-04-21
 
 
Acceptance date: 2022-03-13
 
 
Publication date: 2022-04-08
 
 
Hum Mov. 2023;24(2):25-34
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Purpose:
This study aimed to analyse the effect of an implicit-explicit hybrid learning model on declarative and procedural tactical knowledge of young school handball players.

Methods:
Overall, 30 female handball players (mean age: 13.03 ± 0.75 years) from 2 school teams participated in 25 handball training sessions involving activities focused on both implicit and explicit learning. Declarative knowledge was assessed by using the players’ analyses of 15 handball video scenes, while procedural knowledge was assessed by analysing the players’ actions during a 3 vs. 3 ball possession game.

Results:
The results showed a significant increase in declarative knowledge (t(23) = –4.228; p < 0.001; d = 0.863) but not in procedural knowledge (p > 0.05).

Conclusions:
We concluded that the Iniciação Esportiva Universal model improved the declarative knowledge of school handball athletes.

REFERENCES (35)
1.
Wagner H, Finkenzeller T, Würth S, von Duvillard SP. Individual and team performance in team-handball: a review. J Sports Sci Med. 2014;13(4):808–816.
 
2.
Popadic Gacesa JZ, Barak OF, Grujic NG. Maximal anaerobic power test in athletes of different sport disciplines. J Strength Cond Res. 2009;23(3):751–755; doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181a07a9a.
 
3.
Izquierdo M, Häkkinen K, Gonzalez-Badillo JJ, Ibáñez J, Gorostiaga EM. Effects of long-term training specificity on maximal strength and power of the upper and lower extremities in athletes from different sports. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2002;87(3):264–271; doi: 10.1007/s00421-002-0628-y.
 
4.
Gorostiaga EM, Granados C, Ibáñez J, Izquierdo M. Differences in physical fitness and throwing velocity among elite and amateur male handball players. Int J Sports Med. 2005;26(3):225–232; doi: 10.1055/s-2004-820974.
 
5.
González-Víllora S, Serra-Olivares J, Pastor-Vicedo JC, da Costa IT. Review of the tactical evaluation tools for youth players, assessing the tactics in team sports: football. Springerplus. 2015;4:663; doi: 10.1186/s40064-015-1462-0.
 
6.
García-González L, Araújo D, Carvalho J, del Villar F. An overview of theories and research methods on decision making in tennis [in Spanish]. Rev Psicol Deporte. 2011;20(2):645–666.
 
7.
Raab M. SMART -ER: a situation model of anticipated response consequences in tactical decisions in skill acquisition – extended and revised. Front Psychol. 2015;5:1533; doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01533.
 
8.
López I, Práxedes A, del Villar F. Effect of an intervention teaching program, based on TGfU model, on the cognitive and execution variables, in the physical education context. Eur J Hum Mov. 2016;37:88–108.
 
9.
Hastie PA, Wallhead T. Models-based practice in physical education: the case for sport education. J Teach Phys Educ. 2016;35(4):390–399; doi: 10.1123/jtpe.2016-0092.
 
10.
Gurvitch R, Metzler M. Theory into practice: keeping the purpose in mind: the implementation of instructional models in physical education settings. Strategies. 2010;23(3):32–35; doi: 10.1080/08924562.2010.10590875.
 
11.
Gray S, Sproule J. Developing pupils’ performance in team invasion games. Phys Educ Sport Pedagogy. 2011;16(1):15–32; doi: 10.1080/17408980903535792.
 
12.
Farias C, Valério C, Mesquita I. Sport education as a curriculum approach to student learning of invasion games: effects on game performance and game involvement. J Sports Sci Med. 2018;17(1):56–65.
 
13.
Greco PJ, Pérez-Morales JC, Aburachid LC, Calábria Lopes M, da Silva SR, Benda RN. Universal sports formation: the “ABC” game in sports literacy [in Portuguese]. In: Moreira Lemos KL, Greco PJ, Pérez-Morales JC (eds.), 5° Congresso Internacional dos Jogos Desportivos. Belo Horizonte: Instituto Casa da Educação Física; 2015; 335–359.
 
14.
Masters RSW, Poolton JM, Maxwell JP, Raab M. Implicit motor learning and complex decision making in time-constrained environments. J Mot Behav. 2008;40(1):71–79; doi: 10.3200/JMBR.40.1.71-80.
 
15.
Reber PJ. The neural basis of implicit learning and memory: a review of neuropsychological and neuroimaging research. Neuropsychologia. 2013;51(10):2026–2042; doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.06.019.
 
16.
Poolton JM, Masters RSW, Maxwell JP. Passing thoughts on the evolutionary stability of implicit motor behaviour: performance retention under physiological fatigue. Conscious Cogn. 2007;16(2):456–468; doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2006.06.008.
 
17.
Abernethy B, Schorer J, Jackson RC, Hagemann N. Perceptual training methods compared: the relative efficacy of different approaches to enhancing sport-specific anticipation. J Exp Psychol Appl. 2012;18(2):143–153; doi: 10.1037/a0028452.
 
18.
Kröger C, Roth K. Ball school. An ABC for beginners [in German]. Schorndorf: Hofmann; 1999.
 
19.
Greco PJ. Universal sports formation: sports initiation methodology at school and club [in Portuguese]. Belo Horizonte: UFMG; 1998.
 
20.
Le Noury P, Farrow D, Buszard T, Reid M. Instructional approaches for developing anticipation and decision making in sport. In: Williams AM, Jackson RC (eds.), Anticipation and decision making in sport. New York: Routledge; 2019; 306–326.
 
21.
Fasold F, Houseman L, Noël B, Klatt S. Handball-specific skill acquisition by use of different instruction methods. Hum Mov. 2021;22(3):45–53; doi: 10.5114/hm.2021.100323.
 
22.
Greco PJ, Perez-Morales JC, Aburachid LMC, da Silva SR. Validity evidence of Procedural Tactical Knowledge Test for sports guidance [in Portuguese]. Rev Bras Educ Fís Esporte. 2015;29(2):313–324; doi: 10.1590/1807-55092015000200313.
 
23.
Praça GM, Folgado H, Pereira de Andrade AG, Greco PJ. Influence of additional players on collective tactical behavior in small-sided soccer games. Rev Bras Cineantropom Desempenho Hum. 2016;18(1):62–71; doi: 10.5007/1980-0037.2016v18n1p62.
 
24.
Araújo R, Mesquita I, Hastie P, Pereira C. Students’ game performance improvements during a hybrid sport education – step-game-approach volleyball unit. Eur Phys Educ Rev. 2016;22(2):185–200; doi: 10.1177/1356336X15597927.
 
25.
Farias CF, Ribeiro Mesquita I, Hastie PA. Game performance and understanding within a hybrid sport education season. J Teach Phys Educ. 2015;34(3):363–383; doi: 10.1123/jtpe.2013-0149.
 
26.
Miller A. Games centered approaches in teaching children & adolescents: systematic review of associated student outcomes. J Teach Phys Educ. 2015;34(1):36–58; doi: 10.1123/jtpe.2013-0155.
 
27.
Côté J, Hancock DJ. Evidence-based policies for youth sport programmes. Int J Sport Policy Politics. 2016;8(1):51–65; doi: 10.1080/19406940.2014.919338.
 
28.
Vaeyens R, Lenoir M, Williams AM, Philippaerts RM. Talent identification and development programmes in sport: current models and future directions. Sports Med. 2008;38(9):703–714; doi: 10.2165/00007256-200838090-00001.
 
29.
Ribeiro L, Figueiredo L, Pérez-Morales J, Nascimento G, Porto D, Greco P. Tactical knowledge and visual search analysis of female handball athletes from different age groups. J Phys Educ Sport. 2021;21(2):948–955; doi: 10.7752/jpes.2021.02118.
 
30.
Ferguson CJ. An effect size primer: a guide for clinicians and researchers. Prof Psychol Res Pr. 2009;40(5):532–538; doi: 10.1037/a0015808.
 
31.
Práxedes A, Moreno A, Sevil J, García-González L, del Villar F. A preliminary study of the effects of a comprehensive teaching program, based on questioning, to improve tactical actions in young footballers. Percept Mot Skills. 2016;122(3):742–756; doi: 10.1177/0031512516649716.
 
32.
Davids K, Araújo D, Correia V, Vilar L. How smallsided and conditioned games enhance acquisition of movement and decision-making skills. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2013;41(3):154–161; doi: 10.1097/JES.0b013e318292f3ec.
 
33.
Práxedes A, Del Villar Álvarez F, Moreno A, Gil-Arias A, Davids K. Effects of a nonlinear pedagogy intervention programme on the emergent tactical behaviours of youth footballers. Phys Educ Sport Pedagogy. 2019;24(4):332–343; doi: 10.1080/17408989.2019.1580689.
 
34.
Práxedes A, del Villar F, Pizarro D, Moreno A. The impact of nonlinear pedagogy on decision-making and execution in youth soccer players according to game actions. J Hum Kinet. 2018;62(1):185–198; doi: 10.1515/hukin-2017-0169.
 
35.
Silva B, Garganta J, Santos R, da Costa IT. Comparing tactical behaviour of soccer players in 3 vs. 3 and 6 vs. 6 small-sided games. J Hum Kinet. 2014;41:191–202; doi: 10.2478/hukin-2014-0047.
 
eISSN:1899-1955
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top