ORIGINAL PAPER
Assessment of healthy lifestyle and physical movement levels among female university students: a cross-sectional study
 
More details
Hide details
1
Directorate of Physical Education and Sports, University of Kashmir, Srinagar, India
 
2
Department of Physical Education, University of Ladakh, Leh, India
 
3
University Institute of Physical Education and Sports, Chandigarh University, Chandigarh, India
 
4
Manipal University Jaipur, Jaipur, India
 
 
Submission date: 2025-02-01
 
 
Acceptance date: 2025-03-30
 
 
Online publication date: 2025-09-11
 
 
Corresponding author
Iftikhar Ahmad Wani   

Directorate of Physical Education and Sports, University of Kashmir, 190006, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India
 
 
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Purpose:
This study delves into the healthy lifestyles and physical movement levels of female university students in the union territories of Jammu and Kashmir and the union territory of Ladakh, India. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the healthy lifestyles and physical activity levels of female university students in these union territories. We sought to identify regional trends and differences in health and wellness among young women in these regions.

Methods:
We conducted a cross-sectional survey using a snowball sampling technique, gathering online and offline data from participants in urban and rural areas across all universities in these union territories. The survey included responses from 1,377 students aged 20–32 years. We adapted the Healthy Lifestyle Questionnaire (HLQ) to suit the cultural and regional contexts, assessing six key domains.

Results:
Our results show that female university students in both union territories typically demonstrate low adherence to healthy lifestyle practices and physical activity levels. However, significant disparities were observed between the two regions. Female students from Ladakh were found to be more physically active, better nourished, less stressed, and had healthier habits than their counterparts in Jammu and Kashmir.

Conclusions:
The study highlights the need for tailored programs that promote healthy lifestyles and physical activity specific to each union territory’s needs. Our findings suggest that all six healthy lifestyle components are closely linked and account for 96.9% of the overall healthy lifestyle score variance. Future research should investigate the underlying factors contributing to low engagement in healthy lifestyle behaviours and physical activity in these union territories and investigate the factors contributing to regional differences to formulate effective public health strategies.
REFERENCES (20)
1.
World Health Organization. The life-course approach: from theory to practice: case stories from two small countries in Europe. 2018. Available from: https://iris.who.int/handle/10... (accessed 18.06.2023).
 
2.
Bhat IA, Sultana D. Lifestyle factors and health related quality of life among young adult males. Int J Physiol Nutr Phys Educ. 2018;3(1):26–31.
 
3.
Anjali, Sabharwal M. Barriers in adopting a healthy lifestyle: Insight from college youth. Int J Med Sci Public Health. 2017;6(3):439–9.
 
4.
Guthold R, Ono T, Strong KL, Chatterji S, Morabia A. Worldwide variability in physical inactivity: a 51-country survey. Am J Prev Med. 2008;34(6): 486–94; doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.02.013.
 
5.
Das S, Mishra AJ. Dietary practices and gender dynamics: understanding the role of women. J Ethn Food. 2021;8(1):4; doi: 10.1186/s42779-021-00 081-9.
 
6.
Hwa-Jae L. A study on the food habit and seasonal difference of nutrient intake of adult working women. Korean J Commun Nutr. 2005;10(4): 501–12.
 
7.
Amanvermez Y, Rahmadiana M, Karyotaki E, de Wit L, Ebert DD, Kessler RC , Cuijpers P. Stress management interventions for college students: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Sci Pract. 2023;30(4):423; doi: 10.1111/cpsp. 12342.
 
8.
Kassymova K, Kosherbayeva N, Sangilbayev S, Schachl H. Stress management techniques for students. International Conference on the Theory and Practice of Personality Formation in Modern Society (ICT PPFMS 2018). Adv Soc Sci Educ Hum Res. 2018;198:47–56; doi: 10.2991/ictppfms-18. 2018.10.
 
9.
Daniel CR , Prabhakaran D, Kapur K, Graubard BI, Devasenapathy N, Ramakrishnan L, George PS, Shetty H, Ferrucci LM, Yurgalevitch S, Chatterjee N, Reddy S, Rastogi T, Gupta PC, Mathew A, Sinha R. A cross-sectional investigation of regional patterns of diet and cardio-metabolic risk in India. Nutr J. 2011;10:12; doi: 10.1186/1475-2891- 10-12.
 
10.
Misra DP, Strobino DM, Stashinko EE, Nagey DA, Nanda J. Effects of physical activity on preterm birth. Am J Epidemiol. 1998;147(7):628–35; doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009503.
 
11.
Guthold R, Stevens GA, Riley LM, Bull FC. Worldwide trends in insufficient physical activity from 2001 to 2016: a pooled analysis of 358 populationbased surveys with 1·9 million participants. Lancet Glob Health. 2018;6(10):e1077–86; doi: 10.1016/ S2214-109X(18)30357-7.
 
12.
Anjana RM, Pradeepa R, Das AK, Deepa M, Bhansali A, Joshi SR, Joshi PP, Dhandhania VK, Rao PV, Sudha V, Subashini R, Unnikrishnan R, Madhu SV, Kaur T, Mohan V, Shukla DK; ICMR– INDIAB Collaborative Study Group. Physical activity and inactivity patterns in India–results from the ICMR-INDIAB study (Phase-1)[ICMR-INDIAB- 5]. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014;11:1–1; doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-11-26.
 
13.
Singh SK, Chauhan K, Puri P. Chronic non-communicable disease burden among reproductiveage women in India: evidence from recent demographic and health survey. BMC Womens Health. 2023;23(1):20; doi: 10.1186/s12905-023-02171-z.
 
14.
Tripathy JP, Thakur JS, Jeet G, Chawla S, Jain S, Prasad R. Urban rural differences in diet, physical activity and obesity in India: are we witnessing the great Indian equalisation? Results from a crosssectional STEPS survey. BMC Public Health. 2016; 16:816; doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3489-8.
 
15.
Singh PK, Singh N, Jain P, Sinha P, Kumar C, Singh L, Singh A, Yadav A, Balhara YP, Kashyap S, Singh S, Subramanian SV. Mapping the triple burden of smoking, smokeless tobacco and alcohol consumption among adults in 28,521 communities across 640 districts of India: a sex-stratified multilevel cross-sectional study. Health Place. 2021;69:102565; doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2021.
 
16.
Reddy KS, Shah B, Varghese C, Ramadoss A. Responding to the threat of chronic diseases in India. Lancet. 2005;366(9498):1744–9 doi: 10.1016/S0 140-6736(05)67343-6.
 
17.
Van Poeck K, Lysgaard JA, Reid A. (eds.). Environmental and Sustainability Education Policy. International Trends, Priorities and Challenges. Routledge; 2018; doi: 10.4324/9780203732359.
 
18.
Crowe A, Averett P, Glass JS, Dotson-Blake KP, Grissom SE, Ficken DK, Holmes J. Mental health stigma: personal and cultural impacts on attitudes. J Counselor Pract. 2016;7(2):97–119; doi: 10.22229/spc801925.
 
19.
Warburton DE, Nicol CW, Bredin SS. Health benefits of physical activity: the evidence. CMAJ. 2006;174(6):801–9; doi: 10.1503/cmaj.051351.
 
20.
Wani IA, Choudhary S, Awan AM, Ganaie MU, Nissa B, Shah MM, Shafi S, Dachen J. Development and validation of the Healthy Lifestyle Scale (HLS) for regions with icy winters and dry summers. Univ J Public Health. 2025;13(3):726–45; doi:10.13189/ujph.2025.130321.
 
eISSN:1899-1955
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top