ORIGINAL PAPER
The effects of age and sex on swimming time in master breaststroke swimmers
More details
Hide details
1
Medbase St. Gallen Am Vadianplatz, St. Gallen, Switzerland
2
Department of Physiology, Federal University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
3
Sanatorium Kilchberg, Kilchberg, Switzerland
4
Radiology and Neuroradiology, Institute of Radiology, Spital Zollikerberg, Zurich, Switzerland
5
Institute of Primary Care, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
6
MoveAgeLab, Physical Education Sport Center of Federal University of Espirito Santo, Vitoria, ES, Brazil
7
School of Health and Caring Sciences, University of West Attica, Athens, Greece
8
Department of Physical Education, State University of Para, Para, Brazil
9
Postgraduate Program in Translation Medicine, Federal University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
Submission date: 2024-09-28
Acceptance date: 2025-02-28
Online publication date: 2025-06-25
Corresponding author
Beat Knechtle
Medbase St. Gallen Am Vadianplatz, St. Gallen, Switzerland
Hum Mov. 2025;26(2):73-82
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Purpose:
This study investigated the effects of age and sex on swimming performance in master breaststroke swimmers competing in the World Aquatics Master Championships.
Methods:
For all Master World Championships held between 1986 and 2024, the year of competition, first name, last name, age, age group, stroke and distance were recorded for each swimmer. Descriptive data were presented using mean, standard deviation, and maximum and minimum values. Generalised linear models (GLMs) with a gamma probability distribution and a log-link function assessed the effect of age group and sex on swimming time.
Results:
Between 1986 and 2024, most swimmers (40.7%) competed in the 50 m event (n = 17,575; 7,911 women and 9,664 men), followed by the 100 m event (35.2%, n = 15,211; 7,158 women and 8,053 men), and the 200 m event (24.0%, n = 10,373; 4,934 women and 5,439 men). The GLM results indicated that sex, age group, and the interaction between sex and age group all had significant effects on the 50, 100, and 200 m races. For 50 m races, the effect of sex was significant ( χ2 (1) = 2662.669, p < 0.001), as was the effect of age group ( χ2 (13) = 16407.620, p < 0.001), and the interaction between sex and age group ( χ2 (13) = 233.234, p < 0.001).
Conclusions:
The study revealed that men were generally faster than women in all distances and age groups, except for the 90+ age group in the 100 and 200 m events. Future studies could investigate other strokes and distances. Coaches and sports scientists could use these findings to improve the preparation of their master athletes.
REFERENCES (64)
1.
Hołub M, Stanula A, Baron J, Głyk W, Rosemann T, Knechtle B. Predicting breaststroke and butterfly stroke results in swimming based on Olympics history. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(12):6621; doi: 10.3390/ijerph18126621.
2.
Olstad BH, Gonjo T, Conceicao A, Šťastny J, Seifert L. Arm-leg coordination during the underwater pull-out sequence in the 50, 100 and 200 m breaststroke start. J Sci Med Sport. 2022;25(1): 95–100; doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2021.08.006.
3.
Morais JE, Barbosa TM, Lopes T, Simbana-Escobar D, Marinho DA. Race analysis of the men’s 50 m events at the 2021 LEN European Championships. Sports Biomech. 2022:1–17; doi: 10.1080/ 14763141.2022.2125430.
4.
Nikolaidis PT, Knechtle B. Performance trends in individual medley events during FINA World Master Championships from 1986 to 2014. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2018;58(5):690–8; doi: 10.23 736/S0022-4707.17.06992-4.
5.
Moser C, Sousa CV, Olher RR, Hill L, Nikolaidis PT, Rosemann T, Knechtle B. Pacing in world-class age group swimmers in 200 and 400 m individual medley. Front Physiol. 2021;11:629738; doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.629738.
6.
Wolfrum M, Rust CA, Rosemann T, Lepers R, Knechtle B. Changes in breaststroke swimming performances in national and international athletes competing between 1994 and 2011 – a comparison with freestyle swimming performances. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2014;6:18; doi: 10.1186/2052-1847-6-18.
7.
Knechtle B, Rosemann T, Rust CA. Ice swimming – ‘Ice Mile’ and ‘1 km Ice event’. BMC Sports SciMed Rehabil. 2015;7:20; doi: 10.1186/s13102- 015-0014-9.
8.
Fritzdorf SG, Hibbs A, Kleshnev V. Analysis of speed, stroke rate, and stroke distance for worldclass breaststroke swimming. J Sports Sci. 2009; 27(4):373-8; doi: 10.1080/02640410802632623.
9.
Thompson KG, MacLaren DP, Lees A, Atkinson G. The effects of changing pace on metabolism and stroke characteristics during high-speed breaststroke swimming. J Sports Sci. 2004;22(2):149– 57; doi: 10.1080/02640410310001641467.
10.
Takagi H, Sugimoto S, Nishijima N, Wilson B. Differences in stroke phases, arm-leg coordination and velocity fluctuation due to event, gender and performance level in breaststroke. Sports Biomech. 2004;3(1):15–27; doi: 10.1080/1476314040852 2827.
11.
Seifert L, Komar J, Barbosa T, Toussaint H, Millet G, Davids K. Coordination pattern variability provides functional adaptations to constraints in swimming performance. Sports Med. 2014;44(10): 1333–45; doi: 10.1007/s40279-014-0210-x.
12.
Seifert L, Conceicao A, Gonjo T, Stastny J, Olstad BH. Arm-leg coordination profiling during the dolphin kick and the arm pull-out in elite breaststrokers. J Sports Sci. 2021;39(23):2665–73; doi: 10.1080/02640414.2021.1950446.
13.
Strzała M, Krężałek P, Kaca M, Głąb G, Ostrowski A, Stanula A, Tyka A. Swimming speed of the breaststroke kick. J Hum Kinet. 2012;35:133– 9; doi: 10.2478/v10078-012-0087-4.
14.
Sammoud S, Nevill AM, Negra Y, Bouguezzi R, Chaabene H, Hachana Y. 100-m Breaststroke swimming performance in youth swimmers: the predictive value of anthropometrics. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2018;30(3):393–401; doi: 10.1123/pes. 2017-0220.
15.
Abe D, Tokumaru H, Niihata S, Muraki S, Fukuoka Y, Usui S, Yoshida T. Assessment of short-distance breaststroke swimming performance with critical velocity. J Sports Sci Med. 2006;5(2):340–8.
16.
Keiner M, Yaghobi D, Sander A, Wirth K, Hartmann H. The influence of maximal strength performance of upper and lower extremities and trunk muscles on different sprint swim performances in adolescent swimmers. Sci Sports. 2015; 30(6):e147–54.
17.
Aspenes ST, Karlsen T. Exercise-training intervention studies in competitive swimming. Sports Med. 2012;42(6):527–43; doi: 10.2165/11630760- 000000000-00000.
18.
Zamparo P, Cortesi M, Gatta G. The energy cost of swimming and its determinants. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2020;120(1):41–66; doi: 10.1007/s00421-019- 04270-y.
19.
Barbosa TM, Fernandes RJ, Keskinen KL, Vilas- Boas JP. The influence of stroke mechanics into energy cost of elite swimmers. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2008;103(2):139–49; doi: 10.1007/s00421- 008-0676-z.
20.
Shur NF, Creedon L, Skirrow S, Atherton PJ, Mac- Donald IA, Lund J, Greenhaff PL. Age-related changes in muscle architecture and metabolism in humans: The likely contribution of physical inactivity to age-related functional decline. Ageing Res Rev. 2021;68:101344; doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2021. 101344.
21.
Trombetti A, Reid KF, Hars M, Herrmann FR, Pasha E, Phillips EM, Fielding RA. Age-associated declines in muscle mass, strength, power, and physical performance: impact on fear of falling and quality of life. Osteoporos Int. 201;27(2):463– 71; doi: 10.1007/s00198-015-3236-5.
22.
Medeiros HB, de Araujo DS, de Araujo CG. Agerelated mobility loss is joint-specific: an analysis from 6,000 Flexitest results. Age. 2013;35(6):2399– 407; doi: 10.1007/s11357-013-9525-z.
23.
Hunter SK, Angadi SS, Bhargava A, Harper J, Hirschberg AL, Levine BD, Moreau K L, Nokoff NJ, Stachenfeld NS, Bermon S. The biological basis of sex differences in athletic performance: consensus statement for the american college of sports medicine. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2023;55(12): 2328–60; doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000003300.
24.
Forbes EE, Dahl RE. Pubertal development and behavior: hormonal activation of social and motivational tendencies. Brain Cogn. 201;72(1):66– 72; doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2009.10.007.
25.
Wolfrum M, Knechtle B, Rust CA, Rosemann T, Lepers R. Sex-related differences and age of peak performance in breaststroke versus freestyle swimming. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2013; 5(1):29; doi: 10.1186/2052-1847-5-29.
26.
Konig S, Valeri F, Wild S, Rosemann T, Rust CA, Knechtle B. Change of the age and performance of swimmers across World Championships and Olympic Games finals from 1992 to 2013 – a crosssectional data analysis. Springerplus. 2014;3:652; doi: 10.1186/2193-1801-3-652.
27.
Cooper LW, Powell AP, Rasch J. Master’s swimming: an example of successful aging in competitive sport. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2007;6(6):392–6; doi: 10.1007/s11932-007-0058-z.
28.
Hartley AA, Hartley JT. Age differences and changes in sprint swimming performances of masters athletes. Exp Aging Res. 1986;12(2):65–70; doi: 10.1080/03610738608259438.
29.
Zamparo P, Gatta G, di Prampero P. The determinants of performance in master swimmers: an analysis of master world records. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2012;112(10):3511–8; doi: 10.1007/s004 21-012-2332-x.
30.
Knechtle B, Nikolaidis PT, Rosemann T, Rust CA. Performance trends in age group breaststroke swimmers in the FINA World Championships 1986–2014. Chin J Physiol. 2016;59(5):247–59; doi: 10.4077/CJP.2016.BAE406.
31.
Moser C, Sousa CV, Olher RR, Nikolaidis PT, Knechtle B. Pacing in world-class age group swimmers in 100 and 200 m freestyle, backstroke, breaststroke, and butterf ly. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(11):3875; doi: 10.3390/ ijerph17113875.
32.
Lepers R. Masters athletes: Age is just a number. Mov Sport Sci/Sci Mot. 201 (104), 1-4.
33.
Akaike H. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. 1974;19(6):716–23.
34.
Oppermann J, Knechtle B, Seffrin A, Vancini RL, de Lira CAB, Hill L, Andrade MS. Sex difference in female and male ice swimmers for different strokes and water categories over short and middle distances: a descriptive study. Sports Med Open. 2022;8(1):63; doi: 10.1186/s40798-022- 00451-w.
35.
Sandbakk O, Solli GS, Holmberg HC. Sex differences in world-record performance: the influence of sport discipline and competition duration. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2018;13(1):2–8; doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2017-0196.
36.
Senefeld J, Joyner MJ, Stevens A, Hunter SK. Sex differences in elite swimming with advanced age are less than marathon running. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2016;26(1):17–28; doi: 10.1111/sms.12412.
37.
Bassett AJ, Ahlmen A, Rosendorf JM, Romeo AA, Erickson BJ, Bishop ME. The biology of sex and sport. JBJS Rev. 2020;8(3):e0140; doi: 10.2106/ JBJS.RVW.19.00140.
38.
Reis JF, Millet GP, Bruno PM, Vleck V, Alves FB. Sex and exercise intensity do not influence oxygen uptake kinetics in submaximal swimming. Front Physiol. 2017;8:72; doi: 10.3389/fphys.2017. 00072.
39.
Weir PL, Kerr T, Hodges NJ, McKay SM, Starkes JL. Master swimmers: how are they different from younger elite swimmers? An examination of practice and performance patterns. J Aging Phys Act. 2002;10(1):41–63; doi: 10.1123/japa.10.1.41.
40.
Tanaka H, Seals DR. Age and gender interactions in physiological functional capacity: insight from swimming performance. J Appl Physiol. 1997;82(3): 846–51; doi: 10.1152/jappl.1997.82.3.846.
41.
Donato AJ, Tench K, Glueck DH, Seals DR, Eskurza I, Tanaka H. Declines in physiological functional capacity with age: a longitudinal study in peak swimming performance. J Appl Physiol. 2003;94(2):764–9; doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00 438.2002.
42.
Brustio PR, Cardinale M, Lupo C, Varalda M, De Pasquale P, Boccia G. Being a top swimmer during the early career is not a prerequisite for success: a study on sprinter strokes. J Sci Med Sport. 2021;24(12):1272–7; doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2021. 05.015.
43.
Schulz R, Curnow C. Peak performance and age among superathletes: track and field, swimming, baseball, tennis, and golf. J Gerontol. 1988;43(5): 113–20; doi: 10.1093/geronj/43.5.p113.
44.
Knechtle B, Bragazzi NL, Konig S, Nikolaidis PT, Wild S, Rosemann T, Rust CA. The age in swimming of champions in World Championships (1994– 2013) and Olympic Games (1992–2012): a crosssectional data analysis. Sports. 2016;4(1):17; doi: 10.3390/sports4010017.
45.
Guo J, Huang X, Dou L, Yan M, Shen T, Tang W, Li J. Aging and aging-related diseases: from molecular mechanisms to interventions and treatments. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2022;7(1): 391; doi: 10.1038/s41392-022-01251-0.
46.
Diebel LWM, Rockwood K. Determination of biological age: geriatric assessment vs biological biomarkers. Curr Oncol Rep. 2021;23(9):104; doi: 10.1007/s11912-021-01097-9.
47.
Lin Y, Chen J, Shen B. Interactions Between Genetics, Lifestyle, and Environmental Factors for Healthcare. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2017;1005:167– 91; doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-5717-5_8.
48.
Mallett A, Bellinger P, Derave W, Osborne M, Minahan C. The age, height, and body mass of Olympic swimmers: a 50-year review and update. Int J Sports Sci Coach. 2021;16(1),210–23.
49.
Lima-Borges DS, Portilho NO, Araujo DS, Ravagnani CFC, Almeida JA. Anthropometry and physical performance in swimmers of different styles. Sci Sports. 2022;37(7),542–51.
50.
Fone L, van den Tillaar R. Effect of different types of strength training on swimming performancein competitive swimmers: a systematic review. Sports Med Open. 2022;8(1):19; doi: 10.1186/ s40798-022-00410-5.
51.
Gonzalez-Rave JM, Hermosilla F, Gonzalez-Mohino F, Casado A, Pyne DB. Training intensity distribution, training volume, and periodization models in elite swimmers: a systematic review. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2021;16(7):913–26; doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2020-0906.
52.
Marck A, Antero J, Berthelot G, Johnson S, Sedeaud A, Leroy A, Marc A, Spedding M, Di Meglio JM, Toussaint JF. Age-related upper limits in physical performances. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2019;74(5):591–9; doi: 10.1093/gerona/gly165.
53.
Rahe RH, Arthur RJ. Swim performance decrement over middle life. Med Sci Sports. 1975;7(1): 53–8.
54.
Lexell J. Human aging, muscle mass, and fiber type composition. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1995;50(Spec):11–6; doi: 10.1093/gerona/50a.special_ issue.11.
55.
Deschenes MR. Effects of aging on muscle fibre type and size. Sports Med. 2004;34(12):809–24; doi: 10.2165/00007256-200434120-00002.
56.
Răsădean M. A study on how age influences swimming speed in masters breaststroke men competitions. Timisoara Phys Educ Rehabil J. 2017; 10(19):5–9; doi: 10.1515/tperj-2017-0008.
57.
Ebner N, Anker SD, von Haehling S. Recent developments in the field of cachexia, sarcopenia, and muscle wasting: highlights from the 12th Cachexia Conference. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2020; 11(1):274–85; doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12552.
58.
Dao T, Green AE, Kim YA, Bae SJ, Ha KT, Gariani K, Lee MR, Menzies KJ, Ryu D. Sarcopenia and muscle aging: a brief overview. Endocrinol Metab. 2020 Dec;35(4):716-732; doi: 10.3803/ EnM.2020.405.
59.
Berardi E, Madaro L, Lozanoska-Ochser B, Adamo S, Thorrez L, Bouche M, Coletti D. A pound of flesh: what cachexia is and what it is not. Diagnostics. 2021;11(1):116; doi: 10.3390/diagnostics 11010116.
60.
Larsson L, Degens H, Li M, Salviati L, Lee YI, Thompson W, Kirkland JL, Sandri M. Sarcopenia: aging-related loss of muscle mass and function. Physiol Rev. 2019;99(1):427–511; doi: 10.1152/ physrev.00061.2017.
61.
Rodriguez S, Suarez-Cuervo AN, Leon-Prieto C. Exercise progressions and regressions in sports training and rehabilitation. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2024;40:1879–89; doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.10.026.
62.
Li S, Kempe M, Brink M, Lemmink K. Effectiveness of recovery strategies after training and competition in endurance athletes: an umbrella review. Sports Med Open. 2024;10(1):55; doi: 10.1186/s40798-024-00724-6.
63.
Kellmann M, Bertollo M, Bosquet L, Brink M, Coutts AJ, Duffield R, Erlacher D, Halson SL, Hecksteden A, Heidari J, Kallus KW, Meeusen R, Mujika I, Robazza C, Skorski S, Venter R, Beckmann J. Recovery and performance in sport: consensus statement. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2018;13(2):240–5; doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2017-0759.
64.
Bar-Tur L. Fostering well-being in the elderly: translating theories on positive aging to practical approaches. Front Med. 2021;8:517226; doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.517226.