REVIEW PAPER
Icarus new rising? A narrative review on virtual reality-based motor interventions in older adults
,
 
Rui Paulo 1,2
,
 
,
 
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Instituto Politécnico de Castelo Branco, Castelo Branco, Portugal
 
2
SPRINT Sport Physical Activity and Health Research and Innovation Center, Castelo Branco, Portugal
 
 
Submission date: 2024-12-31
 
 
Acceptance date: 2025-11-19
 
 
Online publication date: 2026-02-19
 
 
Corresponding author
André Ramalho   

Instituto Politécnico de Castelo Branco, Av. Pedro Alvares Cabral 12, 6000-084 Castelo Branco
 
 
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
This narrative review synthesises the emerging evidence on immersive virtual reality motor interventions in older adults, with a focus on key domains of dynamic ageing: mobility, balance, cognitive function, emotional well-being, and social connection. Guided by the SANRA framework, we conducted a structured search (2017–2024) centred on interventions using head-mounted displays. Findings consistently suggest improvements in balance, gait, and muscular strength, though most studies are limited by small sample sizes and short durations. Promising effects are also observed in executive function and mood, yet constrained by methodological heterogeneity and a lack of long-term data. Evidence regarding social outcomes remains limited. Persistent barriers, including limited digital literacy, economic constraints, and the absence of standardised outcome measures, continue to impede widespread implementation. This review maps the current landscape, identifies critical gaps, and calls for larger interdisciplinary studies and inclusive, user-centred design. With these foundations, immersive virtual reality holds promise as a scalable tool for fostering autonomy and vitality in later life.
REFERENCES (77)
1.
Guthold R, Stevens GA, Riley LM, Bull FC. Worldwide trends in insufficient physical activity from 2001 to 2016: a pooled analysis of 358 population-based surveys with 1.9 million participants. Lancet Glob Health. 2018;6:e1077–86; doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30357-7.
 
2.
Bull FC, Al-Ansari SS, Biddle S, Borodulin K, Buman MP, Cardon G, Carty C, Chaput J-P, Chastin S, Chou R, Dempsey PC, DiPietro L, Ekelund U, Firth J, Friedenreich CM, Garcia L, Gichu M, Jago R, Katzmarzyk PT, Lambert E, Leitzmann M, Milton K, Ortega FB, Ranasinghe C, Stamatakis E, Tiedemann A, Troiano RP, van der Ploeg HP, Wari V, Willumsen JF. World Health Organization 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Br J Sports Med. 2020;54(24):1451–62; doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2020-102955.
 
3.
Jaul E, Barron J. Age-related diseases and clinical and public health implications for the 85 years old and over population. Front Public Health. 2017;5:335; doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00335.
 
4.
Perra A, Riccardo CL, De Lorenzo V, De Marco E, Di Natale L, Kurotschka PK, Preti A, Carta MG. Fully immersive virtual reality-based cognitive remediation for adults with psychosocial disabilities: a systematic scoping review of methods, intervention gaps, and meta-analysis of published effectiveness studies. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(2):1527; doi: 10.3390/ijerph20021527.
 
5.
Raffin J, Blennow K, Rolland Y, Cantet C, Guyonnet S, Vellas B, de Souto Barreto P; MAPT/IHU HealthAge Open Science Group. Associations between moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, p-tau181, and cognition in healthy older adults with memory complaints: a secondary analysis from the MAPT. Lancet Healthy Longev. 2025;6(2):100678; doi: 10.1016/j.lanhl.2024.100678.
 
6.
World Health Organization. Ageing and health. 2022. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/... 09.03.2024).
 
7.
De Bruin ED, Schoene D, Pichierri G, Smith ST. Use of virtual reality technique for the training of motor control in the elderly: some theoretical considerations. Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2010;43:229–34; doi: 10.1007/s00391-010-0124-7.
 
8.
Šlosar L, Voelcker-Rehage C, Paravlić AH, Abazo­vic E, de Bruin ED, Marusic U. Combining physical and virtual worlds for motor-cognitive training interventions: position paper with guidelines on technology classification in movement-related research. Front Psychol. 2022;13:1009052; doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1009052.
 
9.
Dermody G, Whitehead L, Wilson G, Glass C. The role of virtual reality in improving health outcomes for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(6):e17331; doi: 10.2196/17331.
 
10.
Campo-Prieto P, Cancela-Carral JM, Rodríguez-Fuentes G. Feasibility and effects of an immersive virtual reality exergame program on physical functions in institutionalized older adults: a randomized clinical trial. Sensors. 2022;22(18):6742; doi: 10.3390/s22186742.
 
11.
Dragas A, Sideraki A. Brain neuroplasticity leveraging virtual reality and brain-computer interface technologies. Sensors. 2024;24(17):5725; doi: 10.3390/s24175725.
 
12.
Georgiev DD, Georgieva I, Gong Z, Nanjappan V, Georgiev GV. Virtual reality for neurorehabilitation and cognitive enhancement. Brain Sci. 2021;11(2):221; doi: 10.3390/brainsci11020221.
 
13.
Piszcz A, Rojek I, Mikołajewski D. Impact of virtual reality on brain–computer interface performance in IoT control: review of current state of knowledge. Appl Sci. 2024;14(22):10541; doi: 10.3390/app142210541.
 
14.
Høeg ER, Bruun-Pedersen JR, Cheary S, Andersen LK, Paisa R, Serafin S, Lange B. Buddy biking: a user study on social collaboration in a virtual reality exergame for rehabilitation. Virtual Reality. 2023;27:245–262; doi: 10.1007/s10055-021-00544-z.
 
15.
Janeh O, Bruder G, Steinicke F, Gulberti A, Poetter-Nerger M. Analyses of gait parameters of younger and older adults during (non-)isometric virtual walking. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2018;24(10):2663–74; doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2017.2771520.
 
16.
Kim A, Darakjian N, Finley JM. Walking in fully immersive virtual environments: an evaluation of potential adverse effects in older adults and individuals with Parkinson’s disease. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2017;14:16; doi: 10.1186/s12984-017-0225-2.
 
17.
Høeg ER, Andersen NB, Malmkjær N, Vaaben AH, Uth J. Hospitalized older adults’ experiences of virtual reality-based group exercise therapy with cycle ergometers: an early feasibility study. Comput Hum Behav Rep. 2023;11:100301; doi: 10.1016/j.chbr.2023.100301.
 
18.
Delbes L, Mascret N, Goulon C, Montagne G. Validation of an immersive virtual reality device accepted by seniors that preserves the adaptive behavior produced in the real world. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022;10:917486.; doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.917486.
 
19.
Barsasella D, Liu MF, Malwade S, Galvin CJ, Dhar E, Chang C-C, Li Y-CY, Syed-Abdul S. Effects of virtual reality sessions on the quality of life, happiness, and functional fitness among older people: a randomized controlled trial from Taiwan. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2021;200:105892; doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105892.
 
20.
Lima Rebêlo F, de Souza Silva LF, Doná F, Sales Barreto A, de Souza Siqueira Quintans J. Immersive virtual reality is effective in the rehabilitation of older adults with balance disorders: a randomized clinical trial. Exp Gerontol. 2021;149:111308; doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2021.111308.
 
21.
Høeg ER, Povlsen TM, Bruun-Pedersen JR, Lange B, Nilsson NC, Haugaard KB, Faber SM, Hansen SW, Kimby CK, Serafin S. System immersion in virtual reality-based rehabilitation of motor function in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Virtual Real. 2021;2:647993; doi: 10.3389/frvir.2021.647993.
 
22.
Kang JM, Kim N, Lee SY, Woo SK, Park G, Yeon BK, Park JW, Youn J-H, Ryu S-H, Lee J-Y, Cho S-J. Effect of cognitive training in fully immersive virtual reality on visuospatial function and frontal-occipital functional connectivity in predementia: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(5); doi: 10.2196/24526.
 
23.
Tremblay MS, Aubert S, Barnes JD, Saunders TJ, Carson V, Latimer-Cheung AE, Chastin SFM, Altenburg TM, Chinapaw MJM; SBRN Terminology Consensus Project Participants. SBRN terminology consensus project process and outcome. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017;14:75;doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0525-8.
 
24.
Kraus WE, Powell KE, Haskell WL, Janz KF, Campbell WW, Jakicic JM, Troiano RP, Sprow K, Torres A, Piercy KL; 2018 Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee. Physical activity, all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, and cardiovascular disease. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019;51(6):1270–1281;doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001939.
 
25.
Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche P, Ioannidis J, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J, Moher D. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:65–94; doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00136.
 
26.
Hamad A, Jia B. How virtual reality technology has changed our lives: an overview of the current and potential applications and limitations. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(18):11278; doi: 10.3390/ijerph191811278.
 
27.
Healy D, Flynn A, Conlan O, McSharry J, Walsh J. Older adults’ experiences and perceptions of immersive virtual reality: systematic review and thematic synthesis. JMIR Serious Games. 2022;10(4):e35802; doi: 10.2196/35802.
 
28.
Kim K, Ahn J. Effectiveness of immersive virtual reality simulation programs using head-mounted displays in promoting physical activity in older adults: a systematic review. Clin Simul Nurs. 2024;94:101593; doi: 10.4040/jkan.21051.
 
29.
Muhla F, Clanché F, Duclos K, Meyer P, Maïaux S, Colnat-Coulbois S, Gauchard GC. Impact of using immersive virtual reality over time and steps in the Timed Up and Go test in elderly people. PLOS ONE. 2020;15:e0229594; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229594.
 
30.
Phu S, Vogrin S, Al Saedi A, Duque G. Balance training using virtual reality improves balance and physical performance in older adults at high risk of falls. Clin Interv Aging. 2019;14:1567–77; doi: 10.2147/CIA.S220890.
 
31.
Stamm O, Dahms R, Reithinger N, Ruß A, Müller-Werdan U. Virtual reality exergame for supplementing multimodal pain therapy in older adults with chronic back pain: a randomized controlled pilot study. Virtual Real. 2022;26:1291–1305; doi: 10.1007/s10055-022-00629-3.
 
32.
Campo-Prieto P, Cancela-Carral JM, Rodríguez-Fuentes G. Wearable immersive virtual reality device for promoting physical activity in Parkinson’s disease patients. Sensors. 2022;22(9):3302; doi: 10.3390/s22093302.
 
33.
Matamala-Gomez M, Donegan T, Bottiroli S, Sandrini G, Sanchez-Vives MV, Tassorelli C. Immersive virtual reality and virtual embodiment for pain relief. Front Hum Neurosci. 2019;13:279; doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00279.
 
34.
Sakhare AR, Yang V, Stradford J, Tsang I, Ravichandran R, Pa J. Cycling and spatial navigation in an enriched, immersive 3D virtual park environment: a feasibility study in younger and older adults. Front Aging Neurosci. 2019;11:218; doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2019.00218.
 
35.
Syed-Abdul S, Malwade S, Nursetyo AA, Sood M, Bhatia M, Barsasella D, Liu MF, Chang C-C, Srinivasan K, Raja M, Li Y-CJ. Virtual reality among the elderly: a usefulness and acceptance study from Taiwan. BMC Geriatr. 2019;19:223; doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1218-8.
 
36.
Keshner EA, Weiss PT, Geifman D, Raban D. Tracking the evolution of virtual reality applications to rehabilitation as a field of study. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2019;16:76; doi: 10.1186/s12984-019-0552-6.
 
37.
Maier M, Rubio Ballester B, Duff A, Duarte Oller E, Verschure PF. Effect of specific over nonspecific VR-based rehabilitation on poststroke motor recovery: a systematic meta-analysis. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2019;33(2):112–129; doi: 10.1177/1545968318820169.
 
38.
Gray SM, Franke T, Sims-Gould J, McKay HA. Rapidly adapting an effective health-promoting intervention for older adults – choose to move – for virtual delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Public Health. 2022;22:1172; doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13547-5.
 
39.
Appel L, Appel E, Bogler O, Wiseman M, Cohen L, Ein N, Abrams HB, Campos JL. Older adults with cognitive and/or physical impairments can benefit from immersive virtual reality experiences: a feasibility study. Front Med. 2020;6:329; doi: 10.3389/fmed.2019.00329.
 
40.
Liao YY, Tseng HY, Lin YJ, Wang CJ, Hsu WC. Using virtual reality-based training to improve cognitive function, instrumental activities of daily living, and neural efficiency in older adults with mild cognitive impairment. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2020;56(1):47–57; doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.19.05899-4.
 
41.
Kruse L, Karaosmanoglu S, Rings S, Ellinger B, Steinicke F. Enabling immersive exercise activities for older adults: a comparison of virtual reality exergames and traditional video exercises. Societies. 2021;11(4):134; doi: 10.3390/soc11040134.
 
42.
Béraud-Peigné N, Maillot P, Perrot A. The effects of a new immersive multidomain training on cognitive, dual-task, and physical functions in older adults. Geroscience. 2024;46(2):1825–41; doi: 10.1007/s11357-023-00952-w.
 
43.
Chirico A, Avellone M, Palombi T, Alivernini F, Alessandrini G, Filosa L, Pistella J, Baiocco R, Lucidi F. Exploring the psychological nexus of virtual and augmented reality on physical activity in older adults: a rapid review. Behav Sci. 2024;14(1):31; doi: 10.3390/bs14010031.
 
44.
Chan JYC, Liu J, Chan ATC, Tsoi KKF. Exergaming and cognitive functions in people with mild cognitive impairment and dementia: a meta-analysis. NPJ Digit Med. 2024;7:154; doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01142-4.
 
45.
Campo-Prieto P, Cancela-Carral JM, Alsina-Rey B, Rodríguez-Fuentes G. Immersive virtual reality as a novel physical therapy approach for nonagenarians: usability and effects on balance outcomes of a game-based exercise program. J Clin Med. 2022;11(13):3911; doi: 10.3390/jcm11133911.
 
46.
Huang KT. Exergaming executive functions: an immersive virtual reality-based cognitive training for adults aged 50 and older. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2020;23(3):143–9; doi: 10.1089/cyber.2019.0269.
 
47.
Muñoz J, Mehrabi S, Li Y, Basharat A, Middleton LE, Cao S, Barnett-Cowan M, Boger J. Immersive virtual reality exergames for persons living with dementia: user-centered design study as a multistakeholder team during the COVID-19 pandemic. JMIR Serious Games. 2022;10(1):e29987; doi: 10.2196/29987.
 
48.
Kwan RYC, Liu JYW, Fong KNK, Qin J, Leung PK, Sin OSK, Hon PY, Suen LW, Tse M-K, Lai CK. Feasibility and effects of virtual reality motor-cognitive training in community-dwelling older people with cognitive frailty: pilot randomized controlled trial. JMIR Serious Games. 2021;9(3); doi: 10.2196/28400.
 
49.
Liao YY, Chen IH, Lin YJ, Chen Y, Hsu WC. Effects of virtual reality-based physical and cognitive training on executive function and dual-task gait performance in older adults with mild cognitive impairment: a randomized control trial. Front Aging Neurosci. 2019;11:162; doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2019.00162.
 
50.
Micarelli A, Viziano A, Micarelli B, Augimeri I, Alessandrini M. Vestibular rehabilitation in older adults with and without mild cognitive impairment: effects of virtual reality using a head-mounted display. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2019;83:246–56; doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2019.05.008.
 
51.
Delgado F, Der Ananian C. The use of virtual reality through head-mounted display on balance and gait in older adults: a scoping review. Games Health J. 2021;10(1):2–12; doi: 10.1089/g4h.2019.0159.
 
52.
Feitosa JA, Fernandes CA, Casseb RF, Castellano G. Effects of virtual reality-based motor rehabilitation: a systematic review of fMRI studies. J Neural Eng. 2022;19; doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/ac456e.
 
53.
Chaze F, Hayden L, Azevedo A, Kamath A, Bucko D, Kashlan Y, Dube M, De Paula J, Jackson A, Reyna C, Dupuis K, Tsotsos L. Virtual reality and well-being in older adults: results from a pilot implementation of virtual reality in long-term care. J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng. 2022;9:205566832110723; doi: 10.1177/20556683211072384.
 
54.
Kalantari S, Xu TB, Mostafavi A, Kim B, Dilan­chian A, Lee A, Boot WR, Czaja SJ. Using immersive virtual reality to enhance social interaction among older adults: a cross-site investigation. Innov Aging. 2023;7(4); doi: 10.1093/geroni/igad031.
 
55.
Drazich BF, Anokye D, Zhu S, Teleb J, Galik E, Colloca L, Resnick B. Motivating older adults through immersive virtual exercise (MOTIVE): a randomized pilot study. Geriatr Nurs. 2023;54:229–36; doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2023.09.019.
 
56.
Huygelier H, Schraepen B, van Ee R, Vanden Abe­ele V, Gillebert CR. Acceptance of immersive head-mounted virtual reality in older adults. Sci Rep. 2019;9:4519; doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-41200-6.
 
57.
Lin TLJH, Wu DY. Exercising with embodied young avatars: how young vs. older avatars in virtual reality affect perceived exertion and physical activity among male and female elderly individuals. Front Psychol. 2021;12:693545; doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.693545.
 
58.
Caserman P, Garcia-Agundez A, Gámez Zerban A, Göbel S. Cybersickness in current-generation virtual reality head-mounted displays: systematic review and outlook. Virtual Real. 2021;25:1153–70; doi: 10.1007/s10055-021-00513-6.
 
59.
Ramalho A, Duarte-Mendes P, Paulo R, Serrano J, Petrica J. Crossing the digital frontier: are older adults ready for virtual reality workouts?. Front Public Health. 2024;12:1324004; doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1324004.
 
60.
Ortiz-Mallasén V, Claramonte-Gual E, González-Chordá VM, Llagostera-Reverter I, Valero-Chillerón MJ, Cervera-Gasch Á. Can virtual reality help improve motor and cognitive function in active aging in older adults? A scoping review. Healthcare. 2024;12(3):356; doi: 10.3390/healthcare12030356.
 
61.
Campo-Prieto P, Rodríguez-Fuentes G, Cancela-Carral JM. Immersive virtual reality exergame promotes the practice of physical activity in older people: an opportunity during COVID-19. Multimodal Technol Interact. 2021;5(9):52; doi: 10.3390/mti5090052.
 
62.
Mascret N, Delbes L, Voron A, Temprado JJ, Montagne G. Acceptance of a virtual reality headset designed for fall prevention in older adults: questionnaire study. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(12):e20691; doi: 10.2196/20691.
 
63.
Helou S, Khalil N, Daou M, El Helou E. Virtual reality for healthcare: a scoping review of commercially available applications for head-mounted displays. Digit Health. 2023;9:20552076231178619; doi: 10.1177/20552076231178619.
 
64.
Kouijzer MMTE, Kip H, Bouman YHA, Kelders SM. Implementation of virtual reality in healthcare: a scoping review on the implementation pro­cess of virtual reality in various healthcare settings. Implement Sci Commun. 2023;4(1):67; doi: 10.1186/s43058-023-00442-2.
 
65.
Ramaseri Chandra AN, El Jamiy F, Reza H. A systematic survey on cybersickness in virtual environments. Comput Secur. 2022;11:51; doi: 10.3390/computers11040051.
 
66.
König LM, Sproesser G, Schupp HT, Renner B. Describing the process of adopting nutrition and fitness apps: behavior stage model approach. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018;6(3):e8261; doi: 10.2196/mhealth.8261.
 
67.
Mahmoud AB. Aging in the digital age: public beliefs about the potential of virtual reality (VR) for the aging population. J Macromarketing. 2024;45(4); doi: 10.1177/02761467241253286.
 
68.
Zhou M, Fukuoka Y, Mintz Y, Goldberg K, Ka­min­­sky P, Flowers E, Aswani A. Evaluating machine learning-based automated personalized daily step goals delivered through a mobile phone app: randomized controlled trial. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018;6(1):e9117; doi: 10.2196/mhealth.9117.
 
69.
Maher CA, Davis CR, Curtis RG, Short CE, Murphy KJ. A physical activity and diet program delivered by an artificially intelligent virtual health coach: proof-of-concept study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020;8(7):e17558; doi: 10.2196/17558.
 
70.
Koulouris D, Menychtas A, Maglogiannis I. An IoT-enabled platform for the assessment of physical and mental activities utilizing augmented reality exergaming. Sensors. 2022;22(9):3181; doi: 10.3390/s22093181.
 
71.
Agarwal A, Ramachandra R, Venkatesh S, Maha­deva Prasanna SR. Biometrics in extended reality: a review. Discov Artif Intell. 2024;4(81); doi: 10.1007/s44163-024-00190-9.
 
72.
Gnacek M, Broulidakis J, Mavridou I, Fatoorechi M, Seiss E, Kostoulas T, Balaguer-Ballester E, Kiprijanovska I, Rosten C, Nduka C. emteqPRO – fully integrated biometric sensing array for non-invasive biomedical research in Virtual Reality. Front Virtual Real. 2022;3:781218; doi: 10.3389/frvir.2022.781218.
 
73.
Ben-Sadoun G, Manera V, Alvarez J, Sacco G, Ro­bert P. Recommendations for the design of serious games in neurodegenerative diseases. Front Aging Neurosci. 2018;10:13; doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2018.00013.
 
74.
Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 1989;13(3):319–40; doi: 10.2307/249008.
 
75.
Davis R, Campbell R, Hildon Z, Hobbs L, Michie S. Theories of behaviour and behaviour change across the social and behavioural sciences: a scoping review. Health Psychol Rev. 2015;9(3):323–44; doi: 10.1080/17437199.2014.941722.
 
76.
Oinas-Kukkonen H. A foundation for the study of behavior change support systems. Pers Ubiquitous Comput. 2013;17:1223–35; doi: 10.1007/s00779-012-0591-5.
 
77.
Opara J. The role of lifestyle physical activity in preventing multiple sclerosis. Hum Mov. 2024;25(3):1–9; doi: 10.5114/hm/191101.
 
eISSN:1899-1955
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top