ORIGINAL PAPER
Internal and external loads in professional women’s Rugby Sevens: analysis of a block-based training session with small games
 
More details
Hide details
1
Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso – UFMT, Cuiabá, Brazil
 
2
Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora – UFJF, Governador Valadares, Brazil
 
3
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria – UFSM, Santa Maria, Brazil
 
4
Centro Universitário UDF, Brasília, Brazil
 
 
Submission date: 2024-05-07
 
 
Acceptance date: 2024-07-13
 
 
Publication date: 2024-09-30
 
 
Corresponding author
Henrique de Oliveira Castro   

Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso – UFMT, Av. Fernando Corrêa da Costa, 2367. Boa Esperança, Cuiabá, Mato Grosso, Brazil. 78060-900
 
 
Hum Mov. 2024;25(3):54-61
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Purpose:
This study aimed to compare internal load (IL) and external load (EL) variables between blocks of a game-based Rugby Sevens training session.

Methods:
A descriptive cross-sectional study design was employed. Twenty-eight professional athletes from the first division of the Brazilian national championship were monitored during a game-based training session, which consisted of varying durations of ball-in-play blocks. The training session comprised 4 blocks of 1 min, 2 blocks of 2 min, and 1 block of 3 min of ball-in-play, with 1-min intervals between blocks of the same duration and 2-min intervals between blocks of different durations.

Results:
A reduction in EL was reported during longer bouts of ball-in-play. Specifically, a reduction was observed when comparing block 5 to block 1 (p = 0.021) and when comparing block 7 with blocks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 for distance per min. For accelerations and decelerations, blocks 5, 6, and 7 showed lower values than block 1 (p = 0.001 and p = 0.005, respectively). Block 4 showed an increase in rate of perceived exertion (RPE) values compared to blocks 1 (p = 0.010) and 2 (p = 0.004). Increased RPE values were also found in block 5 compared to block 1 (p = 0.001), as well as compared to blocks 2 (p = 0.001) and 3 (p = 0.002). RPE in block 7 was higher than in blocks 1, 2, 3, and 4 (p = 0.001).

Conclusions:
In summary, higher RPE values were reported across blocks, and IL appeared to be more volume-dependent.

 
REFERENCES (34)
1.
Duthie G, Pyne D, Hooper S. Applied physiology and game analysis of rugby union. Sports Med. 2003;33(13):973–91; doi: 10.2165/00007256- 200333130-00003.
 
2.
Ball S, Mark H, Orr R. Movement demands of Rugby Sevens in men and women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Strength Cond Res. 2019; 33(12):3475–90; doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000 003197.
 
3.
Cunningham DJ, Shearer DA, Carter N, Drawer S, Pollard B, Bennett M, Eager R, Cook CJ, Farrell J, Russell M, Kilduff LP. Assessing worst case scenarios in movement demands derived from global positioning systems during international rugby union matches: rolling averages versus fixed length epochs. PloS ONE. 2018;13(4):e0195197; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195197.
 
4.
Furlan N, Waldron M, Shorter K, Gabbett TJ, Mitchell J, Fitzgerald E, Osborne MA, Gray AJ. Running-intensity fluctuations in elite Rugby Sevens performance. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2015;10(6):802–7; doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2014-0315.
 
5.
Higham DG, Pyne DB, Anson JM, Eddy A. Movement patterns in Rugby Sevens: effects of tournament level, fatigue and substitute players. J Sci Med Sport. 2012;15(3):277–82; doi: 10.1016/j. jsams.2011.11.256.
 
6.
Lacome M, Peeters A, Mathieu B, Marrier B, Carling C, Piscione J. Can we use GPS for assessing sprinting performance in Rugby Sevens? A concurrent validity and between-device reliability study. Biol Sport. 2019;36(1):25–9; doi: 10.5114/ biolsport.2018.78903.
 
7.
Impellizzeri FM, Marcora SM, Coutts AJ. Internal and external training load: 15 years on. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2019;14(2):270–3; doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2018-0935.
 
8.
Granatelli G, Gabbett TJ, Briotti G, Padulo J, Buglione A, D’Ottavio S, Ruscello, BM. Match analysis and temporal patterns of fatigue in Rugby Sevens. J Strength Cond Res. 2014;28(3):728– 34; doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31829d23c3.
 
9.
Vescovi JD, Goodale T. Physical demands of women’s Rugby Sevens matches: female athletes in motion (FAiM) study. Int J Sports Med. 2015;36(11); 887–92; doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1548940.
 
10.
Tee JC, Lambert MI, Coopoo Y. GPS comparison of training activities and game demands of professional rugby union. Int J Sports Sci Coach. 2016;11(2):200–11; doi: 10.1177/1747954116637 153.
 
11.
McLaren SJ, Macpherson TW, Coutts AJ, Hust C, Spears IR, Weston M. The relationships between internal and external measures of training load and intensity in team sports: a meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2018;48(3):641–58; doi: 10.1007/ s40279-017-0830-z.
 
12.
Foster C, Florhaug JA, Franklin J, Gottschall L, Hrovatin LA, Parker S, Doleshal P, Dodge C. A new approach to monitoring exercise training. J Strength Cond Res. 2001;15(1):109–15; doi: 10.1519/001 24278-200102000-00019.
 
13.
Haddad M, Stylianides G, Djaoui L, Dellal A, Chamari K. Session-RPE method for training load monitoring: validity, ecological usefulness, and inf luencing factors. Front Neurosci. 2017;11:612; doi: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00612.
 
14.
Quarrie KL, Raftery M, Blackie J, Cook CJ, Fuller CW, Gabbett TJ, Gray AJ, Gill N, Hennessy L, Kemp S, Lambert M, Nichol R, Mellalieu SD, Piscione J, Stadelmann J, Tucker R. Managing player load in professional rugby union: a review of current knowledge and practices. Br J Sports Med. 2017;51(5):421–7; doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-0 96191.
 
15.
Comyns T, Flanagan EP. Applications of the session rating of perceived exertion system in professional rugby union. Strength Cond J. 2013;35(6): 78–85; doi: 10.1519/SSC.0000000000000015.
 
16.
Foster C. Monitoring training in athletes with reference to overtraining syndrome. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998;30(7):1164–8; doi: 10.1097/000057 68-199807000-00023.
 
17.
Comyns T, Hannon A. Strength and conditioning coaches’ application of the session rating of perceived exertion method of monitoring within professional rugby union. J Hum Kinet. 2018;61(1): 155–66; doi: 10.1515/hukin-2017-0118.
 
18.
Robertson S, Bartlett JD, Gastin PB. Red, amber, or green? Athlete monitoring in team sport: the need for decision-support systems. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2017;12(Suppl 2):273–9; doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2016-0541.
 
19.
Vanrenterghem J, Nedergaard NJ, Robinson MA, Drust B. Training load monitoring in team sports: a novel framework separating physiological and biomechanical load-adaptation pathways. Sports Med. 2017;47(11):2135–42; doi: 10.1007/s40279- 017-0714-2.
 
20.
Impellizzeri FM, Rampinini E, Marcora SM. Physiological assessment of aerobic training in soccer. J Sports Sci. 2005;23(6):583–92; doi: 10.1080/02 640410400021278.
 
21.
Bartlett JD, O’Connor F, Pitchford N, Torres-Ronda L, Robertson SJ. Relationships between internal and external training load in team-sport athletes: evidence for an individualized approach. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2017;12(2):230–34; doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2015-0791.
 
22.
Castillo D, Weston M, McLaren SJ, Cámara J, Yanci J. Relationships between internal and external match-load indicators in soccer match officials. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2017;12(7):922–7; doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2016-0392.
 
23.
Lovell TWJ, Sirotic AC, Impellizzeri FM, Coutts AJ. Factors affecting perception of effort (session rating of perceived exertion) during rugby league training. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2013;8(1): 62–9; doi: 10.1123/ijspp.8.1.62.
 
24.
Gallo T, Cormack S, Gabbett T, Williams M, Lorenzen C. Characteristics impacting on session rating of perceived exertion training load in Australian footballers. J Sports Sci. 2015;33(5):467–75; doi: 10.1080/02640414.2014.947311.
 
25.
McKay AK, Stellingwerff T, Smith ES, Martin DT, Mujika I, Goosey-Tolfrey VL, Sheppard J, Burke LM. Defining training and performance caliber: a participant classification framework. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2022;17(2):317–31; doi: 10.1123/ ijspp.2021-0451.
 
26.
Mooney T, Malone S, Izri E, Dowling S, Darragh IAJ. The running performance of elite U20 Gaelic football match-play. Sport Sci Health. (2021);17: 771–9; doi: 10.1007/s11332-021-00760-9.
 
27.
Graham WJ. An investigation into GPS brand reporting differences and validation of a betweenbrand calibration tool for football. Brisbane: Queensland University of Technology; 2021.
 
28.
Ferguson CJ. An effect size primer: a guide for clinicians and researchers. Prof Psychol Res Pract. 2009;40(5):532–8; doi: 10.1037/a0015808.
 
29.
Ball S, Halaki M, Orr R. Movement demands of Rugby Sevens in men and women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Strength Cond Res. 2019;33(12):3475–90; doi: 10.1519/JSC.000000 0000003197.
 
30.
Goodale TL, Gabbett TJ, Tsai M-C, Stellingwerff T, Sheppard J. The effect of contextual factors on physiological and activity profiles in international women’s Rugby Sevens. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2017;12(3):370–6; doi: 10.1123/ijspp. 2015-0711.
 
31.
Fuller CW, Taylor AE, Raftery M. Should player fatigue be the focus of injury prevention strategies for international Rugby Sevens tournaments? Br J Sports Med. 2016;50(11);682–7; doi: 10.1136/ bjsports-2016-096043.
 
32.
Conte D, Arruda AFS, Clemente FM, Castillo D, Kamarauskas P, Guerriero A. Assessing the relationship between external and internal match loads in elite women’s Rugby Sevens. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2022;17(4):634–9; doi: 10.1123/ ijspp.2021-0097.
 
33.
Epp-Stobbe A, Tsai MC, Morris C, Klimstra M. The influence of physical contact on athlete load in international female Rugby Sevens. J Strength Cond Res. 2023;37(2):383–7; doi: 10.1519/JSC.00 00000000004262.
 
34.
Blair MR, Body SF, Croft HG. Relationship between physical metrics and game success with elite Rugby Sevens players. Int J Perform Anal Sport. 2017;17(4):418–28; doi: 10.1080/24748668.2017. 1348060.
 
eISSN:1899-1955
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top