ORIGINAL PAPER
Cardiopulmonary- versus neuromuscular-based high-intensity interval training during a pre-season in youth female basketball players
1
VALFIS Research Group, Institute of Biomedicine, University of León, León, Spain
2
Faculty of Health Sciences, University Isabel I, Burgos, Spain
3
Department of Physical Activity Sciences, University of Los Lagos, Santiago, Chile
4
Centre for Research in Exercise Physiology, Faculty of Science, Mayor University, Santiago, Chile
5
Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences Laboratory. Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago, Chile
6
Research Group for Planning and Assessment of Training and Athletic Performance, Pontifical University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
Submission date: 2021-12-02
Acceptance date: 2022-04-26
Publication date: 2022-07-04
Hum Mov. 2023;24(2):44-51
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Purpose:
This study compares the effects of 6 weeks of pre-season cardiopulmonary- vs. neuromuscular-based high-intensity interval training (HIIT) in female basketball players’ physical fitness.
Methods:
Overall, 16 female regional-level U19 basketball players were randomly allocated to a cardiopulmonary-based HIIT (C-HIIT) group (n = 8; age: 17.9 ± 0.6 years; height: 175.4 ± 6.5 cm; body mass: 68.1 ± 7.2 kg) or a neuromuscularbased HIIT (N-HIIT) group (n = 8; age: 18.0 ± 0.4 years; height: 175.6 ± 3.6 cm; body mass: 69.8 ± 5.0 kg). At the PRE-, MID- (3 weeks), and POST-training time points, the participants performed a 30-15 Intermittent Fitness Test (30-15 IFT; aerobic performance) and a repeated sprint ability (RSA) test (6 × 15 + 15 m [with 180° change of direction] with 20-second passive recovery).
Results:
A 2 × 3 mixed model analysis of variance revealed that both training interventions improved (p < 0.05) 30-15 IFT after 6 weeks (C-HIIT, 8.6% and ES = 2.01; N-HIIT, 3.3% and ES = 0.52). C-HIIT improved (p < 0.05) 30-15 IFT after 3 weeks (3.8%, ES = 0.90). Neither group improved (p > 0.05) in RSA results.
Conclusions:
C-HIIT and N-HIIT improves aerobic performance in female basketball players. However, for improvements in RSA, other training drills (e.g., repeated sprint training) and tasks with a higher number of changes of direction may be investigated.
This study compares the effects of 6 weeks of pre-season cardiopulmonary- vs. neuromuscular-based high-intensity interval training (HIIT) in female basketball players’ physical fitness.
Methods:
Overall, 16 female regional-level U19 basketball players were randomly allocated to a cardiopulmonary-based HIIT (C-HIIT) group (n = 8; age: 17.9 ± 0.6 years; height: 175.4 ± 6.5 cm; body mass: 68.1 ± 7.2 kg) or a neuromuscularbased HIIT (N-HIIT) group (n = 8; age: 18.0 ± 0.4 years; height: 175.6 ± 3.6 cm; body mass: 69.8 ± 5.0 kg). At the PRE-, MID- (3 weeks), and POST-training time points, the participants performed a 30-15 Intermittent Fitness Test (30-15 IFT; aerobic performance) and a repeated sprint ability (RSA) test (6 × 15 + 15 m [with 180° change of direction] with 20-second passive recovery).
Results:
A 2 × 3 mixed model analysis of variance revealed that both training interventions improved (p < 0.05) 30-15 IFT after 6 weeks (C-HIIT, 8.6% and ES = 2.01; N-HIIT, 3.3% and ES = 0.52). C-HIIT improved (p < 0.05) 30-15 IFT after 3 weeks (3.8%, ES = 0.90). Neither group improved (p > 0.05) in RSA results.
Conclusions:
C-HIIT and N-HIIT improves aerobic performance in female basketball players. However, for improvements in RSA, other training drills (e.g., repeated sprint training) and tasks with a higher number of changes of direction may be investigated.
REFERENCES (30)
1.
Conte D, Favero TG, Lupo C, Francioni FM, Capranica L, Tessitore A. Time-motion analysis of Italian elite women’s basketball games: individual and team analyses. J Strength Cond Res. 2015;29(1):144–150; doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000633.
2.
Matthew D, Delextrat A. Heart rate, blood lactate concentration, and time-motion analysis of female basketball players during competition. J Sports Sci. 2009;27(8):813–821; doi: 10.1080/02640410902926420.
3.
Mujika I, Spencer M, Santisteban J, Goiriena JJ, Bishop D. Age-related differences in repeated-sprint ability in highly trained youth football players. J Sports Sci. 2009;27(14):1581–1590; doi: 10.1080/02640410903350281.
4.
Ross A, Gill N, Cronin J, Malcata R. The relationship between physical characteristics and match performance in rugby sevens. Eur J Sport Sci. 2015;15(6):565–571; doi: 10.1080/17461391.2015.1029983.
5.
Rampinini E, Bishop D, Marcora SM, Ferrari Bravo D, Sassi R, Impellizzeri FM. Validity of simple field tests as indicators of match-related physical performance in top-level professional soccer players. Int J Sports Med. 2007;28(3):228–235; doi: 10.1055/s-2006-924340.
6.
Gabbett TJ, Stein JG, Kemp JG, Lorenzen C. Relationship between tests of physical qualities and physical match performance in elite rugby league players. J Strength Cond Res. 2013;27(6):1539–1545; doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318274f236.
7.
Fort-Vanmeerhaeghe A, Montalvo A, Latinjak A, Unnithan V. Physical characteristics of elite adolescent female basketball players and their relationship to match performance. J Hum Kinet. 2016;53:167–178; doi: 10.1515/hukin-2016-0020.
8.
Girard O, Mendez-Villanueva A, Bishop D. Repeatedsprint ability – part I. Factors contributing to fatigue. Sports Med. 2011;41(8):673–694; doi: 10.2165/11590550-000000000-00000.
9.
Attene G, Pizzolato F, Calcagno G, Ibba G, Pinna M, Salernitano G, et al. Sprint vs. intermittent training in young female basketball players. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2014;54(2):154–161.
10.
Delextrat A, Martinez A. Small-sided game training improves aerobic capacity and technical skills in basketball players. Int J Sports Med. 2014;35(5):385–391; doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1349107.
11.
Aschendorf PF, Zinner C, Delextrat A, Engelmeyer E, Mester J. Effects of basketball-specific high-intensity interval training on aerobic performance and physical capacities in youth female basketball players. Phys Sportsmed. 2019;47(1):65–70; doi: 10.1080/00913847.2018.1520054.
12.
Delextrat A, Gruet M, Bieuzen F. Effects of small-sided games and high-intensity interval training on aerobic and repeated sprint performance and peripheral muscle oxygenation changes in elite junior basketball players. J Strength Cond Res. 2018;32(7):1882–1891; doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002570.
13.
Attene G, Nikolaidis PT, Bragazzi NL, Dello Iacono A, Pizzolato F, Zagatto AM, et al. Repeated sprint ability in young basketball players (part 2): the chronic effects of multidirection and of one change of direction are comparable in terms of physiological and performance responses. Front Physiol. 2016;7:262; doi: 10.3389/fphys.2016.00262.
14.
Zarić I, Dopsaj M, Marković M. Match performance in young female basketball players: relationship with laboratory and field tests. Int J Perform Anal Sport. 2018;18(1):90–103; doi: 10.1080/24748668.2018.1452109.
15.
Buchheit M, Laursen PB. High-intensity interval training, solutions to the programming puzzle. Part I: cardiopulmonary emphasis. Sports Med. 2013;43(5):313–338; doi: 10.1007/s40279-013-0029-x.
16.
Buchheit M, Al Haddad H, Millet GP, Lepretre PM, Newton M, Ahmaidi S. Cardiorespiratory and cardiac autonomic responses to 30-15 Intermittent Fitness Test in team sport players. J Strength Cond Res. 2009;23(1):93–100; doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31818b9721.
17.
Buchheit M. The 30-15 Intermittent Fitness Test: 10 year review. Myorobie J. 2010;1:1–9.
18.
Buchheit M, Laursen PB. High-intensity interval training, solutions to the programming puzzle. Part II: anaerobic energy, neuromuscular load and practical applications. Sports Med. 2013;43(10):927–954; doi: 10.1007/s40279-013-0066-5.
19.
Sanchez-Sanchez J, Carretero M, Ramirez-Campillo R, Petisco C, Diego M, Gonzalo-Skok O, et al. Effects of high-intensity training with one versus three changes of direction on youth female basketball players’ performance. Kinesiology. 2018;50(1 Suppl. 1):117–125.
20.
Hill-Haas SV, Coutts AJ, Rowsell GJ, Dawson BT. Generic versus small-sided game training in soccer. Int J Sports Med. 2009;30(9):636–642; doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1220730.
21.
Buchheit M, Lefebvre B, Laursen PB, Ahmaidi S. Reliability, usefulness, and validity of the 30-15 Intermittent Ice Test in young elite ice hockey players. J Strength Cond Res. 2011;25(5):1457–1464; doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181d686b7.
22.
Castagna C, Manzi V, D’Ottavio S, Annino G, Padua E, Bishop D. Relation between maximal aerobic power and the ability to repeat sprints in young basketball players. J Strength Cond Res. 2007;21(4):1172–1176; doi: 10.1519/R-20376.1.
23.
Lakens D. Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Front Psychol. 2013;4:863; doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863.
24.
Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
25.
Richardson JTE. Eta squared and partial eta squared as measures of effect size in educational research. Educ Res Rev. 2011;6(2):135–147; doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2010.12.001.
26.
Purkhús E, Krustrup P, Mohr M. High-intensity training improves exercise performance in elite women volleyball players during a competitive season. J Strength Cond Res. 2016;30(11):3066–3072; doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001408.
27.
Krustrup P, Mohr M, Nybo L, Jensen JM, Nielsen JJ, Bangsbo J. The Yo-Yo IR2 test: physiological response, reliability, and application to elite soccer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006;38(9):1666–1673; doi: 10.1249/01.mss.0000227538.20799.08.
28.
Čović N, Jelešković E, Alić H, Rađo I, Kafedžić E, Sporiš G, et al. Reliability, validity and usefulness of 30-15 Intermittent Fitness Test in female soccer players. Front Physiol. 2016;7:510; doi: 10.3389/fphys.2016.00510.
29.
Bruce LM, Moule SJ. Validity of the 30-15 Intermittent Fitness Test in subelite female athletes. J Strength Cond Res. 2017;31(11):3077–3082; doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001775.
30.
Padulo J, Bragazzi NL, Nikolaidis PT, Dello Iacono A, Attene G, Pizzolato F, et al. Repeated sprint ability in young basketball players: multi-direction vs. one-change of direction (part 1). Front Physiol. 2016;7:133; doi: 10.3389/fphys.2016.00133.
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
| eISSN: | 1899-1955 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
