ORIGINAL PAPER
Arm function and muscle activity responses after using the Kinesio taping inhibitory technique
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, State University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil
 
2
Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
 
 
Submission date: 2019-11-05
 
 
Acceptance date: 2021-02-08
 
 
Publication date: 2021-12-15
 
 
Hum Mov. 2022;23(3):65-71
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Purpose:
This study aims at showing the effects in muscle activity and arm function under the influence of the inhibitory muscle technique of the Kinesio tape method in healthy muscles.

Methods:
Overall, 20 apparently healthy subjects underwent the procedures 3 times, in 3 different tape conditions: no tape, Kinesio tape, and non-elastic tape. The muscle activity was obtained in millivolts through electromyography on biceps brachii and deltoid during 3 specific tasks, and the arm function was determined in seconds with the Action Research Arm Test, a standardized tool conceived to assess upper extremity function, divided into the subscales of grasp, grip, pinch, and gross movement.

Results:
The electromyography results and most of the Action Research Arm Test dimensions did not show any statistically significant differences in any comparison (p > 0.05) between the tape conditions. However, there could be a tendency to perform movements faster under the influence of the Kinesio tape, as implied in the dimensions of grip (p = 0.01) and total (p = 0.04) of the Action Research Arm Test.

Conclusions:
The Kinesio tape inhibitory muscle technique and tape conditions did not evoke significant effects in muscle activity or arm function in apparently healthy muscles.

 
REFERENCES (19)
1.
Lemos TV, Pereira KC, Protássio CC, Lucas LB, Matheus JPC. The effect of Kinesio Taping on handgrip strength. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015;27(3):567–570; doi: 10.1589/jpts.27.567.
 
2.
Yang J-M, Lee J-H. Is Kinesio taping to generate skin convolutions effective for increasing local blood circulation? Med Sci Monit. 2018;24:288–293; doi: 10.12659/MSM.905708.
 
3.
Cai C, Au IPH, An W, Cheung RTH. Facilitatory and inhibitory effects of Kinesio tape: fact or fad? J Sci Med Sport. 2016;19(2):109–112; doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2015.01.010.
 
4.
Kim K-M, Davis B, Hertel J, Hart J. Effects of Kinesio taping in patients with quadriceps inhibition: a randomized, single-blinded study. Phys Ther Sport. 2017;24:67–73; doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2016.08.015.
 
5.
Kase K, Lemos TV, Dias EM. Kinesio Taping – introduction to the method and muscle techniques [in Portuguese]. São Paulo: Andreoli; 2013.
 
6.
Kim JY, Kim SY. Effects of Kinesio tape compared with non-elastic tape on hand grip strength. J Phys Ther Sci. 2016;28(5):1565–1568; doi: 10.1589/jpts.28.1565.
 
7.
Jung H-J, Lee J-Y, Hwang J-K, Choi B-R. Comparison of efficiency of elastic and non-elastic taping on induced quadriceps fatigue by knee extension exercise. J Phys Ther Sci. 2017;29(12):2199–2200; doi: 10.1589/jpts.29.2199.
 
8.
Huang C-Y, Hsieh T-H, Lu S-C, Su F-C. Effect of the Kinesio tape to muscle activity and vertical jump performance in healthy inactive people. Biomed Eng Online. 2011;10:70; doi: 10.1186/1475-925X-10-70.
 
9.
Poon KY, Li SM, Rooper MG, Wong MKM, Wong O, Cheung RTH. Kinesiology tape does not facilitate muscle performance: a deceptive controlled trial. Man Ther. 2015;20(1):130–133; doi: 10.1016/j.math.2014.07.013.
 
10.
Kim W-I, Choi Y-K, Lee J-H, Park Y-H. The effect of muscle facilitation using Kinesio taping on walking and balance of stroke patients. J Phys Ther Sci. 2014;26(11):1831–1834; doi: 10.1589/jpts.26.1831.
 
11.
Bravi R, Quarta E, Cohen EJ, Gottard A, Minciacchi D. A little elastic for a better performance: Kinesiotaping of the motor effector modulates neural mechanisms for rhythmic movements. Front Syst Neurosci. 2014;8:181; doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00181.
 
12.
Dos Santos Vieira PC, Almeida Oliveira R, Fernandes LM, Pereira K, Pasucci Sande de Souza LA. Augmented muscle activation in reaching movements after stroke. Hum Mov. 2020;21(3):39–46; doi: 10.5114/hm.2020.91344.
 
13.
Garcia T, Dal Pupo J, Knihs DA, Furlaneto Rodrigues OA, Zimmermann HB, Padulo J. Single- versus multi-joint isometric protocols to induce a post-activation potentiation effect on squat jump performance. Hum Mov. 2020;21(3):71–80; doi: 10.5114/hm.2020.91348.
 
14.
Hermens HJ, Freriks B, Merletti R, Stegeman D, Blok J, Rau G, et al. European recommendations for Surface electromyography: results of the SENIAM project. Roessingh Research and Development; 1999.
 
15.
Gates DH, Walters LS, Cowley J, Wilken JM, Resnik L. Range of motion requirements for upper-limb activities of daily living. Am J Occup Ther. 2016;70(1):7001350010p1-7001350010p10; doi: 10.5014/ajot.2016.015487.
 
16.
Davidson J, Pinheiro Tsopanoglou S, Zuniga Dourado V, Carvas N Jr, Miyashiro Nunes Dos Santos A, Goulart AL, et al. Differences in activation of the vastus lateralis muscle during maximal exercise test between very-lowbirth-weight preterm and full-term children. Hum Mov. 2020;21(3):31–38; doi: 10.5114/hm.2020.91343.
 
17.
Santanielo N, Nóbrega SR, Scarpelli MC, Alvarez IF, Otoboni GB, Pintanel L, et al. Effect of resistance training to muscle failure vs non-failure on strength, hypertrophy and muscle architecture in trained individuals. Biol Sport. 2020;37(4):333–341; doi: 10.5114/biolsport.2020.96317.
 
18.
Yozbatiran N, Der-Yeghiaian L, Cramer SC. A standardized approach to performing the Action Research Arm Test. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008;22(1):78–90; doi: 10.1177/1545968307305353.
 
19.
Briem K, Eythörsdöttir H, Magnúsdóttir RG, Pálmarsson R, Rúnarsdöttir T, Sveinsson T. Effects of Kinesio Tape compared with nonelastic sports tape and the untaped ankle during a sudden inversion perturbation in male athletes. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2011;41(5):328–335; doi: 10.2519/jospt.2011.3501.
 
eISSN:1899-1955
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top