ORIGINAL PAPER
Use of Laban/Bartenieff Movement Studies to profile neonatal movements: an exploratory study
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
JSS College of Physiotherapy, Mysore, India
 
 
Submission date: 2019-06-18
 
 
Acceptance date: 2019-12-18
 
 
Publication date: 2020-06-21
 
 
Hum Mov. 2020;21(4):97-101
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Purpose:
Monitoring body movements in neonates can have important clinical implications, as these are early predictors of neurodevelopmental disability. The most valid analysis method applied for this purpose is general movement assessment (GMA). Performing GMA requires special training, which is often inaccessible to healthcare providers in low- and middleincome countries. Hence, this prospective exploratory study was proposed to profile movement in typical neonates to distinguish it from abnormal movements using Laban/Bartenieff Movement Studies (LBMS) framework, which has been widely used to analyse movement in a variety of situations.

Methods:
Overall, 8 typical neonates were videotaped and 10 cycles of movements were sampled, which resulted in 80 units. Data saturation occurred at 5 children.

Results:
The results obtained are consistent when described using LBMS language.

Conclusions:
LBMS may be a feasible and viable method to interpret and document movement patterns in neonates as an alternative to other, more resource-intensive methods.

 
REFERENCES (19)
1.
Prechtl HF, Fargel JW, Weinmann HM, Bakker HH. Postures, motility and respiration of low-risk pre-term infants. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1979;21(1):3–27; doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1979.tb01577.x.
 
2.
Prechtl HF. Qualitative changes of spontaneous movements in fetus and preterm infant are a marker of neurological dysfunction. Early Hum Dev. 1990;23(3):151– 158; doi: 10.1016/0378-3782(90)90011-7.
 
3.
Prechtl HF, Einspieler C, Cioni G, Bos AF, Ferrari F, Sontheimer D. An early marker for neurological deficits after perinatal brain lesions. Lancet. 1997;349(9062): 1361–1363; doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)10182-3.
 
4.
Zuk L, Harel S, Leitner Y, Fattal-Valevski A. Neonatal general movements: an early predictor for neurodevelopmental outcome in infants with intrauterine growth retardation. J Child Neurol. 2004;19(1):14–18; doi: 10.1177/088307380401900103011.
 
5.
Guest AH. Labanotation: the system of analyzing and recording movement. New York: Routledge; 2013.
 
6.
Schwartz P. Laban movement analysis: theory and application. J Phys Educ Recreat Dance. 1995;66(2): 25–26; doi: 10.1080/07303084.1995.10607037.
 
7.
HD Pro Webcam C920 – Logitech Support: Logitech; 2012. Available from: https://support.logitech.com/ en_us/product/hd-pro-webcam-c920.
 
8.
Ricci E, Einspieler C, Craig AK. Feasibility of using the general movements assessment of infants in the United States. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2018;38(3):269– 279; doi: 10.1080/01942638.2017.1395380.
 
9.
Saunders B, Sim J, Kingstone T, Baker S, Waterfield J, Bartlam B, et al. Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Qual Quant. 2018;52(4):1893–1907; doi: 10.1007/ s11135-017-0574-8.
 
10.
Groff E. Laban movement analysis: charting the ineffable domain of human movement. J Phys Educ Recreat Dance. 1995;66(2):27–30; doi: 10.1080/07303084.1995. 10607038.
 
11.
Einspieler C, Prechtl HFR. Prechtl’s assessment of general movements: a diagnostic tool for the functional assessment of the young nervous system. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2005;11(1):61–67; doi: 10.1002/ mrdd.20051.
 
12.
Einspieler C, Prechtl HFR, Bos A, Ferrari F, Cioni G. Prechtl’s method on the qualitative assessment of general movements in preterm, term and young infants. London: Mac Keith Press; 2004.
 
13.
Einspieler C, Sigafoos J, Bartl-Pokorny KD, Landa R, Marschik PB, Bölte S. Highlighting the first 5 months of life: general movements in infants later diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder or Rett syndrome. Res Autism Spectr Disord. 2014;8(3):286–291; doi: 10.1016/ j.rasd.2013.12.013.
 
14.
Kodric J, Sustersic B, Paro-Panjan D. Assessment of general movements and 2.5 year developmental outcomes: pilot results in a diverse preterm group. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2010;14(2):131–137; doi: 10.1016/j. ejpn.2009.04.012.
 
15.
Prechtl HF, Ferrari F, Cioni G. Predictive value of general movements in asphyxiated fullterm infants. Early Hum Dev. 1993;35(2):91–120; doi: 10.1016/0378-3782(93) 90096-d.
 
16.
Prechtl HF. The optimality concept. Early Hum Dev. 1980;4(3):201–205; doi: 10.1016/0378-3782(80)90026-2.
 
17.
Hadders-Algra M. General movements in early infancy: what do they tell us about the nervous system? Early Hum Dev. 1993;34(1–2):29–37; doi: 10.1016/0378- 3782(93)90038-v.
 
18.
Adde L. Prediction of cerebral palsy in young infants: computer-based assessment of general movements. Doctoral thesis. Trondheim: Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine; 2010.
 
19.
Cioni G, Prechtl HF, Ferrari F, Paolicelli PB, Einspieler C, Roversi MF. Which better predicts later outcome in full-term infants: quality of general movements or neurological examination? Early Hum Dev. 1997;50(1): 71–85; doi: 10.1016/s0378-3782(97)00094-7.
 
eISSN:1899-1955
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top