ORIGINAL PAPER
The relationship between swimming performance and isokinetic shoulder strength of elite swimmers
 
More details
Hide details
1
Faculty of Physical Culture and Health, University of Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland
 
 
Submission date: 2019-06-24
 
 
Acceptance date: 2020-05-22
 
 
Publication date: 2021-05-24
 
 
Hum Mov. 2021;22(4):10-19
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Purpose:
The aims of the study were to determine the relationship between the shoulder muscles strength and the athletic performance of high-level swimmers and to detect the strength variables that had the biggest impact on high performance in sports swimming.

Methods:
The study involved 39 high qualified swimmers (12 females and 27 males). To determine the strength variables, shoulder flexion and extension were carried out in isokinetic conditions. A Biodex S4 dynamometer was used. The following protocols were applied: (1) 3 repetitions, 60°/s; (2) 20 repetitions, 180°/s. The r-Pearson correlation analysis or the rho-Spearman correlation analysis were used. The family-wise error was checked.

Results:
The level of strength had a greater influence on the swimming performance in males (25 of the 68 obtained variables) than in females (18 of the 68 variables). The strength variables that had the biggest impact on high performance in sports swimming were peak torque (r: 0.39–0.633), total work (r: 0.408–0.692), average power (r: 0.44–0.739), and average peak torque (r: 0.456–0.72).

Conclusions:
Regardless of the respondents’ gender or the analysed shoulder movement, the following variables were repeated: peak torque, total work, average power, and average peak torque. Unfortunately, the results were not statistically significant. Only acceleration time of the left shoulder in the arm flexion movement in males was significant. Despite this, once the muscular groups are similar for the listed strength variables, the swimmer’s capability to produce force out of water seems to help them perform better in the water.

REFERENCES (41)
1.
Łubkowska W, Wiażewicz A, Eider J. The correlation between sports results in swimming and general andspecial muscle strength. J Educ Health Sport. 2017;7(12):222–236; doi: 10.5281/zenodo.1125879.
 
2.
Banach J, Cieślicka M, Muszkieta R, Zukow W, Stępniak R. Endurance swimming and gear students of physical education based on the basis of the Cooper’s test [in Polish]. J Educ Health Sport. 2015;5(5):445–462; doi: 10.5281/zenodo.18157.
 
3.
Morais JE, Silva AJ, Marinho DA, Marques MC, Batalha N, Barbosa TM. Modelling the relationship between biomechanics and performance of young sprinting swimmers. Eur J Sport Sci. 2016;16(6):661–668; doi: 10.1080/17461391.2016.1149227.
 
4.
Płatonow WN. Competitive training in swimming [in Polish]. Warszawa: COS; 1997.
 
5.
Czabański B, Fiłon M, Zatoń K. Elements of swimming theory [in Polish]. Wrocław: AWF; 2003.
 
6.
Przybylska A. Crawl swimming [in Polish]. Warszawa: Landie.pl; 2010.
 
7.
Keiner M, Yaghobi D, Sander A, Wirth K, Hartmann H. The influence of maximal strength performance of upper and lower extremities and trunk muscles on different sprint swim performances in adolescent swimmers. Sci Sports. 2015;30(6):e147–e154; doi: 10.1016/j.scispo.2015.05.001.
 
8.
Toussaint HM, Beek PJ. Biomechanics of competitive front crawl swimming. Sports Med. 1992;13(1):8–24; doi: 10.2165/00007256-199213010-00002.
 
9.
Troszczyński J. Sport swimming technique [in Polish]. In: Iwanowski W (ed.), Swimming. Selected issues [in Polish]. Szczecin: Uniwersytet Szczeciński; 1999; 81–105.
 
10.
Bartkowiak E. Sport swimming [in Polish]. Warszawa: COS; 1999.
 
11.
Pink MM, Tibone JE. The painful shoulder in the swimming athlete. Orthop Clin North Am. 2000;31(2):247–261; doi: 10.1016/s0030-5898(05)70145-0.
 
12.
Hawley JA, Williams MM. Relationship between upper body anaerobic power and freestyle swimming performance. Int J Sports Med. 1991;12(1):1–5; doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1024645.
 
13.
Belfry GR, Noble EG, Taylor AW. Effects of two different weight training programs on swimming performance and muscle enzyme activities and fiber type. J Strength Cond Res. 2016;30(2):305–310; doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000842.
 
14.
Aspenes S, Kjendlie P-L, Hoff J, Helgerud J. Combined strength and endurance training in competitive swimmers. J Sports Sci Med. 2009;8(3):357–365.
 
15.
Garrido N, Marinho DA, Barbosa TM, Costa AM, Silva AJ, Pérez-Turpin JA, et al. Relationships between dry land strength, power variables and short sprint performance in young competitive swimmers. J Hum Sport Exerc. 2010;5(2):240–249; doi: 10.4100/jhse.2010.52.12.
 
16.
Newton RU, Jones J, Kraemer WJ, Wardle H. Strength and power training of Australian Olympic swimmers. Strength Cond J. 2002;24(3):7–15; doi: 10.1519/00126548-200206000-00001.
 
17.
Vilas-Boas JP, Barbosa TM, Fernandes RJ. Speed fluctuation, swimming economy, performance and training in swimming. In: Seifert L, Chollet D, Mujika I (eds.), World book of swimming: from science to performance. New York: Nova Science Publishers; 2010; 119–134.
 
18.
Seifert L, Chollet D. Modelling spatial-temporal and coordinative parameters in swimming. J Sci Med Sport. 2009;12(4):495–499; doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2008.03.002.
 
19.
Johnson JN, Gauvin J, Fredericson M. Swimming biomechanics and injury prevention: new stroke techniques and medical considerations. Phys Sportsmed. 2003;31(1):41–46; doi: 10.3810/psm.2003.01.165.
 
20.
Morouço P, Marinho DA, Amaro NM, Peréz-Turpin JA, Marques MC. Effects of dry-land strength training on swimming performance: a brief review. J Hum Sport Exerc. 2012;7(2):553–559; doi: 10.4100/jhse.2012.72.18.
 
21.
Wiażewicz A. Isokinetic evaluation of athletes force parameters in Swimming Training Centre in Szczecin [in Polish]. In: Eider J (ed.), Selected Olympic issues in theory and practice [in Polish]. Szczecin: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego; 2015; 197–213.
 
22.
Swimrankings. Results of the tested swimmers in preferred competitions. Available from: https://www.swimrankings.net/.
 
23.
Edouard P, Codine P, Samozino P, Bernard P-L, Hérisson C, Gremeaux V. Reliability of shoulder rotators isokinetic strength imbalance measured using the Biodex dynamometer. J Sci Med Sport. 2013;16(2):162–165; doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2012.01.007.
 
24.
Van Meeteren J, Roebroeck ME, Stam HJ. Test-retest reliability in isokinetic muscle strength measurements of the shoulder. J Rehabil Med. 2002;34(2):91–95; doi: 10.1080/165019702753557890.
 
25.
Roy JS, Ma B, Macdermid JC, Woodhouse LJ. Shoulder muscle endurance: the development of a standardized and reliable protocol. Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol. 2011;3(1):1; doi: 10.1186/1758-2555-3-1.
 
26.
Simpson D, Ehrensberger M, Nulty C, Regan J, Broderick P, Blake C, et al. Peak torque, rate of torque development and average torque of isometric ankle and elbow contractions show excellent test-retest reliability. Hong Kong Physiother J. 2019;39(1):67–76; doi: 10.1142/S1013702519500069.
 
27.
Biodex Medical Systems, Inc. Biodex Multi-Joint System – Pro. Setup/operation manual. Available from: https://m.biodex.com/sites/def....
 
28.
Alonso-Cortés Fradejas B, Alvear-Órdenes I, Ramírez-García C, García-Isla FJ, González-Gallego J, Seco Calvo J. Isokinetic assessment of the shoulder in young swimmers with a diagonal pattern [in Spanish]. Fisioterapia. 2006;28(6):298–307; doi: 10.1016/S0211-5638(06)74064-0.
 
29.
Van De Velde A, De Mey K, Maenhout A, Calders P, Cools AM. Scapular-muscle performance: two training programs in adolescent swimmers. J Athl Train. 2011;46(2):160–167; doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-46.2.160.
 
30.
Batalha N, Marmeleira J, Garrido N, Silva AJ. Does a water-training macrocycle really create imbalances in swimmers’ shoulder rotator muscles? Eur J Sport Sci. 2015;15(2):167–172; doi: 10.1080/17461391.2014.908957.
 
31.
Ellenbecker TS, Davies GJ. The application of isokinetics in testing and rehabilitation of the shoulder complex. J Athl Train. 2000;35(3):338–350; doi: 10.1016/B978-044306701-3.50057-8.
 
32.
Morouço PG, Marinho DA, Keskinen KL, Badillo JJ, Marques MC. Tethered swimming can be used to evaluate force contribution for short-distance swimming performance. J Strength Cond Res. 2014;28(11):3093–3099; doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000509.
 
33.
Klarowicz A, Zatoń K, Albiński P. Differences in conscious reception of stimuli from water environment in school children. In: Zatoń K, Jaszczak M (eds.), Science in swimming II. Wrocław: AWF; 2008; 16–22.
 
34.
Sharp RL, Troup JP, Costill DL. Relationship between power and sprint freestyle swimming. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1982;14(1):53–56; doi: 10.1249/00005768-198201000-00010.
 
35.
Havriluk R. Analyzing hand force in swimming. Three typical limiting factors. ASCA Newsl. 2009;5:22,24,26.
 
36.
Morouço P, Keskinen KL, Vilas-Boas JP, Fernandes RJ. Relationship between tethered forces and the four swimming techniques performance. J Appl Biomech. 2011;27(2):161–169; doi: 10.1123/jab.27.2.161.
 
37.
Biodex Medical Systems, Inc. Isokinetic testing and data interpretation. Available from: http://www.biodex.com/sites/de....
 
38.
Codine P, Bernard PL, Pocholle M, Herisson C. Isokinetic strength measurement and training of the shoulder: methodology and results [in French]. Ann Readapt Med Phys. 2005;48(2):80–92; doi: 10.1016/j.annrmp.2004.07.002.
 
39.
Lampadari V, Thanopoulos V, Dopsaj M, Rozi G. Effects of age and gender in physiological responses, mechanics, and performance of master swimmers. Hum Mov. 2019;20(1):17–23; doi: 10.5114/hm.2019.79393.
 
40.
Jaszczanin J, Buryta R, Buryta B, Krupecki K, Cięszczyk P. The differences between circumference of lower limbs among young football players [in Polish]. Ann Univ Mariae Curie-Sklodowska Sectio D. 2004;59(Suppl. 14):381–387.
 
41.
Holm S. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand J Stat. 1979;6(2):65–70; doi: 10.2307/4615733.
 
eISSN:1899-1955
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top