ORIGINAL PAPER
Prevalence of W-sitting in preschool and school age, with gait and foot analysis
More details
Hide details
1
Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
2
Sport Sciences and Diagnostics Research Group, Prince Sultan University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
3
Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovakia
4
King Abdullah Specialized Children’s Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
These authors had equal contribution to this work
Submission date: 2025-01-19
Acceptance date: 2025-11-19
Online publication date: 2026-03-02
Corresponding author
Veronika Vasilcova
King Abdullah Specialized Children’s Hospital, P.O.BOX: 22490, 11426
Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Purpose:
This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of W-sitting, gait, and foot analysis in preschool and school-age participants.
Methods:
A cohort study was conducted, including healthy participants without any pathology or other diagnoses. Foot disposition was determined using the Foot Posture Index (FPI-6), and gait patterns were analysed using the Zebris FDM platform. The study was conducted at the Gait Laboratory of King Abdullah Specialised Children’s Hospital and Prince Sultan University in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. A total of 190 participants were included, ranging in age from 12 to 109 months. The preschool-aged children (12–60 months) comprised 168 participants (88%), while the school-aged children (61–109 months) comprised 22 participants (12%).
Results:
The preschool group had a female majority (92, 55%), while males accounted for 76 participants (45%). W-sitting was observed in both groups, with 61 preschool participants (36%) and eight school-aged participants (36%) preferring this posture. Gait analysis revealed patterns specific to preschool children aged 12–60 months, indicating an increased pronation on the left foot. However, the overall risk of developing foot pronation or supination deformities in Saudi participants was low, though not negligible.
Conclusions:
W-sitting may impact foot posture and gait patterns. Early assessment of foot posture and gait during the paediatric age is recommended to minimise the risk of complications or deformities that may affect a child’s development.
REFERENCES (30)
1.
Polczyk AE. Early use of Vojta therapy in children with postural asymmetry, at risk of hip dysplasia. Pediatr Ther. 2018;8(1):339; doi: 10.4172/2161-0665.1000339.
2.
Jordan KP, Kadam UT, Hayward R, Porcheret M, Young C, Croft P. Annual consultation prevalence of regional musculoskeletal problems in primary care: an observational study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010;11:144; doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-144.
3.
Bertsch C, Unger H, Winkelmann W, Rosenbaum D. Evaluation of early walking patterns from plantar pressure distribution measurements. First year results of 42 children. Gait Posture. 2004;19(3):235-42; doi: 10.1016/S0966-6362(03)00064-X.
4.
Kasović M, Štefan L, Zvonár M. Foot characteristics during walking in 6–14-year-old children. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):9501; doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-66498-5.
5.
Wagner F, Hofbauer R, Matussek J. Flexible flatfoot in children: variation within normal range or need for treatment? [in German]. Orthopadie. 2013;42(6):455–68; doi: 10.1007/s00132-013-2111-3.
6.
Gould N, Moreland M, Alvarez R, Trevino S, Fenwick J. Development of the child’s arch. Foot Ankle. 1989;9(5):241–5; doi: 10.1177/107110078900900506.
7.
Gijon-Nogueron G, Martinez-Nova A, Alfageme-Garcia P, Montes-Alguacil J, Evans AM. International normative data for paediatric foot posture assessment: a cross-sectional investigation. BMJ Open. 2019;9(4):e023341; doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023341.
8.
Price C, Morrison SC, Hashmi F, Phethean J, Nester C. Biomechanics of the infant’s foot during the transition to independent walking: a narrative review. Gait Posture. 2018;59:140–6; doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.09.005.
9.
Oleksy Ł, Mika A, Łukomska-Górny A, Marchewka, A. Intrarater reliability of the Foot Posture Index (FPI-6) applied as a tool in foot assessment in children and adolescents. Med Rehabil. 2010;14(4):10–20.
10.
Morrison SC, Ferrari J. Inter-rater reliability of the Foot Posture Index (FPI-6) in the assessment of the paediatric foot. J Foot Ankle Res. 2009;21(2):26; doi: 10.1186/1757-1146-2-26.
11.
Sutherland D. The development of mature gait. Gait Posture. 1997;6(2):163–70; doi: 10.1016/S0966-6362(97)00029-5.
12.
Stebbins JA, Harrington ME, Giacomozzi C, Thompson N, Zavatsky A, Theologis TN. Assessment of sub-division of plantar pressure measurement in children. Gait Posture. 2005;22(4):372–6; doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2004.10.004.
13.
Gimunová M, Sebera M, Bozděch M, Kolářová K, Vodička T, Zvonář M. The impact of different periods of walking experience on kinematic gait parameters in toddlers. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;19(1):58; doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010058.
14.
Zamborsky R, Kokavec M, Harsanyi S, Attia D, Danisovic L. Developmental dysplasia of hip: perspectives in genetic screening. Med Sci. 2019;7(4):59; doi: 10.3390/medsci7040059.
15.
American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Board. Detection and Nonoperative Management of Pediatric Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip in Infants up to Six Months of Age Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline (March 21, 2022). Available from:
https://www.aaos.org/globalass... (accessed 02.01.2023).
16.
Klisic PJ. Congenital dislocation of the hip – a misleading term: brief report. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1989;71(1):136; doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.71B1.2914985.
17.
American Physical Therapy Association. APTA Guide to Physical Therapist Practice 4.0. Available from:
https://guide.apta.org/ (accessed 01.06.2021).
18.
American Physical Therapy Association. Physical Therapist’s Scope of Practice HOD P06-17-09-16/HOD P06-17-08-07 (2017, the 13th of September). Available from:
https://www.apta.org/your-prac... (accessed 25.04.2021).
19.
Clarke NM. Swaddling and hip dysplasia: an orthopaedic perspective. Arch Dis Child. 2014;99(1):5–6; doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2013-304143.
20.
Patel H; Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care. Preventive health care, 2001 update: screening and management of developmental dysplasia of the hip in newborns. CMAJ. 2001;164(12):1669–77.
22.
Vandenbroucke JP, von Elm E, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Mulrow CD, Pocock SJ, Poole C, Schlesselman JJ, Egger M; STROBE Initiative. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. PLOS Med. 2007;4(10):e297; doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040297.
23.
Redmond A. The foot posture index: user guide and manual. Leeds (2020, the 20st of March) West Yorkshire: University of Leeds; 2005; 1–19; Available from: www.leeds.ac.uk/medicine/FASTER/FPI (accessed 04.04.2021).
24.
Redmond AC, Crane YZ, Menz HB. Normative values for the foot posture index. J Foot Ankle Res. 2008;1(1):6; doi: 10.1186/1757-1146-1-6.
25.
Zebris Medical GmbH. Specifications and operating instructions [Instructions Manual]. Isny im Allgäu: Zebris Medical GmbH; 2016. Retrieved from: hard copy.
26.
Zebris Medical GmbH. Zebris FDM 1.12: software user manual [User manual]. Isny im Allgäu: Zebris Medical GmbH; 2015. Retrieved from: hard copy.
27.
Zgoda M, Wasilewski P, Wasilewska I, Golicki D. Influence of the treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip by the abduction brace on locomotor development in children. J Child Orthop. 2010;4(1):9–12; doi: 10.1007/s11832-009-0219-0.
28.
Dunn PM. Is late walking a marker of congenital displacement of the hip?. Arch Dis Child. 1990;65(10):1183–4; doi: 10.1136/adc.65.10.1183-c.
29.
Lee W-C, Chen T-Y, Hung L-W, Wang T-M, Chang C-H, Lu T-W. Increased loading rates during gait correlate with morphology of unaffected hip in juveniles with treated developmental hip dysplasia. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021;9:7074266; doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.704266.
30.
Vasilcova V, AlHarthi M, Jawadi AH, Zvonař M. The use of visual analysis for gait and foot posture in children with developmental dysplasia of the hip. Diagnostics. 2023;13(5):973; doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13050973.