ORIGINAL PAPER
Physical fitness profile of rural versus urban primary school children in eThekwini district, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
1
Discipline of Physiotherapy, School of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
Submission date: 2019-12-06
Acceptance date: 2021-02-08
Publication date: 2021-11-17
Hum Mov. 2022;23(3):140-149
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Purpose:
Assessment of physical fitness (PF) in children as a health indicator is crucial for identifying areas requiring attention regarding the prevention of non-communicable diseases. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the PF profiles of rural and urban primary school children in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.
Methods:
In a cross-sectional survey, 520 consecutive primary school children (urban: 260, rural: 260, age: 6–13 years) recruited from 2 randomly selected schools were assessed with the Eurofit test battery. Four components of the test were assessed: standing long jump (SLJ), sit-ups (SU), 5-m shuttle run test (5m-SRT), and cricket ball throw (CBT). Composite z-scores for the tests were ranked by age and sex, and categorized into low, moderate, and high PF.
Results:
Urban and rural children were statistically comparable (p > 0.05) regarding their age, weight, and height but rural children had a significantly higher body mass index (p < 0.05) than their urban-based counterparts. Rural children obtained significantly higher SLJ (p < 0.001) and SU scores (p < 0.001) and lower 5m-SRT scores (p < 0.001) than those from the urban school but their CBT scores were statistically comparable (p = 0.994). The prevalence of low PF status was significantly higher (p < 0.001) among urban children (54.6%) compared with their rural counterparts (26.5%).
Conclusions:
Prevalence of low PF was higher among urban primary school learners compared with their rural counterparts. Place of residence should be considered when implementing effective interventions to promote physical activity and health.
Assessment of physical fitness (PF) in children as a health indicator is crucial for identifying areas requiring attention regarding the prevention of non-communicable diseases. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the PF profiles of rural and urban primary school children in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.
Methods:
In a cross-sectional survey, 520 consecutive primary school children (urban: 260, rural: 260, age: 6–13 years) recruited from 2 randomly selected schools were assessed with the Eurofit test battery. Four components of the test were assessed: standing long jump (SLJ), sit-ups (SU), 5-m shuttle run test (5m-SRT), and cricket ball throw (CBT). Composite z-scores for the tests were ranked by age and sex, and categorized into low, moderate, and high PF.
Results:
Urban and rural children were statistically comparable (p > 0.05) regarding their age, weight, and height but rural children had a significantly higher body mass index (p < 0.05) than their urban-based counterparts. Rural children obtained significantly higher SLJ (p < 0.001) and SU scores (p < 0.001) and lower 5m-SRT scores (p < 0.001) than those from the urban school but their CBT scores were statistically comparable (p = 0.994). The prevalence of low PF status was significantly higher (p < 0.001) among urban children (54.6%) compared with their rural counterparts (26.5%).
Conclusions:
Prevalence of low PF was higher among urban primary school learners compared with their rural counterparts. Place of residence should be considered when implementing effective interventions to promote physical activity and health.
REFERENCES (28)
1.
Carnethon MR, Gulati M, Greenland P. Prevalence and cardiovascular disease correlates of low cardiorespiratory fitness in adolescents and adults. JAMA. 2005;294(23):2981–2988; doi: 10.1001/jama.294.23.2981.
2.
Dobosz J, Mayorga-Vega D, Viciana J. Percentile values of physical fitness levels among Polish children aged 7 to 19 years – a population-based study. Cent Eur J Public Health. 2015;23(4):340–351; doi: 10.21101/cejph.a4153.
3.
Amusa LO, Goon DT, Amey AK, Toriola AL. Healthrelated physical fitness among rural primary school children in Tshannda, South Africa. Sci Res Essays. 2011;6(22):4665–4680; doi: 10.5897/SRE10.522.
4.
Ortega FB, Ruiz JR, Castillo MJ, Sjöström M. Physical fitness in childhood and adolescence: a powerful marker of health. Int J Obes. 2008;32(1):1–11; doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803774.
5.
Ruiz JR, Castro-Piñero J, Artero EG, Ortega FB, Sjöström M, Suni J, et al. Predictive validity of health-related fitness in youth: a systematic review. Br J Sports Med. 2009;43(12):909–923; doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2008.056499.
6.
Ishihara T, Morita N, Nakajima T, Okita K, Yamatsu K, Sagawa M. Direct and indirect relationships of physical fitness, weight status, and learning duration to academic performance in Japanese schoolchildren. Eur J Sport Sci. 2018;18(2):286–294; doi: 10.1080/17461391.2017.1409273.
7.
Stalsberg R, Pedersen AV. Effects of socioeconomic status on the physical activity in adolescents: a systematic review of the evidence. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2010;20(3):368–383; doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2009.01047.x.
8.
Fjørtoft I, Pedersen AV, Sigmundsson H, Vereijken B. Measuring physical fitness in children who are 5 to 12 years old with a test battery that is functional and easy to administer. Phys Ther. 2011;91(7):1087–1095; doi: 10.2522/ptj.20090350.
9.
Sylejmani B, Myrtaj N, Maliqi A, Gontarev S, Georgiev G, Kalac R. Physical fitness in children and adolescents in rural and urban areas. J Hum Sport Exerc. 2019;14(4):866–875; doi: 10.14198/jhse.2019.144.15.
10.
Tomkinson GR, Lang JJ, Tremblay MS. Temporal trends in the cardiorespiratory fitness of children and adolescents representing 19 high-income and upper middleincome countries between 1981 and 2014. Br J Sports Med. 2019;53(8):478–486; doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-097982.
11.
Peer N, Bradshaw D, Laubscher R, Steyn N, Steyn K. Urban-rural and gender differences in tobacco and alcohol use, diet and physical activity among young black South Africans between 1998 and 2003. Glob Health Action. 2013;6:19216; doi: 10.3402/gha.v6i0.19216.
12.
Charan J, Biswas T. How to calculate sample size for different study designs in medical research? Indian J Psychol Med. 2013;35(2):121–126; doi: 10.4103/0253-7176.116232.
13.
Armstrong MEG, Lambert EV, Lambert MI. Physical fitness of South African primary school children, 6–13 years of age: discovery vitality health of the nation study. Percept Mot Skills. 2011;113(3):999–1016; doi: 10.2466/06.10.13.PMS.113.6.999-1016.
14.
Tambalis KD, Panagiotakos DB, Psarra G, Daskalakis S, Kavouras SA, Geladas N, et al. Physical fitness normative values for 6–18-year-old Greek boys and girls, using the empirical distribution and the lambda, mu, and sigma statistical method. Eur J Sport Sci. 2016;16(6):736–746; doi: 10.1080/17461391.2015.1088577.
15.
Monyeki MA, Neetens R, Moss SJ, Twisk J. The relationship between body composition and physical fitness in 14 year old adolescents residing within the Tlokwe local municipality, South Africa: the PAHL study. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:374; doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-374.
16.
Pojskic H, Eslami B. Relationship between obesity, physical activity, and cardiorespiratory fitness levels in children and adolescents in Bosnia and Herzegovina: an analysis of gender differences. Front Physiol. 2018;9:1734; doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.01734.
17.
Micklesfield LK, Pedro TM, Kahn K, Kinsman J, Pettifor JM, Tollman S, et al. Physical activity and sedentary behavior among adolescents in rural South Africa: levels, patterns and correlates. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:40; doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-40.
18.
Ramos-Sepúlveda JA, Ramírez-Vélez R, Correa-Bautista JE, Izquierdo M, García-Hermoso A. Physical fitness and anthropometric normative values among Colombian-Indian schoolchildren. BMC Public Health. 2016;16:962; doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3652-2.
19.
Committee on Environmental Health, Tester JM. The built environment: designing communities to promote physical activity in children. Pediatrics. 2009;123(6):1591–1598; doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-0750.
20.
Ojiambo RM, Easton C, Casajús JA, Konstabel K, Reilly JJ, Pitsiladis Y. Effect of urbanization on objectively measured physical activity levels, sedentary time, and indices of adiposity in Kenyan adolescents. J Phys Act Health. 2012;9(1):115–123; doi: 10.1123/jpah.9.1.115.
21.
Muthuri SK, Wachira L-JM, Leblanc AG, Francis CE, Sampson M, Onywera VO, et al. Temporal trends and correlates of physical activity, sedentary behaviour, and physical fitness among school-aged children in Sub- Saharan Africa: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014;11(3):3327–3359; doi: 10.3390/ijerph110303327.
22.
Tappe KA, Glanz K, Sallis JF, Zhou C, Saelens BE. Children’s physical activity and parent’s perception of the neighborhood environment: neighborhood impact on kids study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2013;10:39; doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-10-39.
23.
Chillón P, Ortega FB, Ferrando JA, Casajus JA. Physical fitness in rural and urban children and adolescents from Spain. J Sci Med Sport. 2011;14(5):417–423; doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2011.04.004.
24.
Manna I. Growth development and maturity in children and adolescent: relation to sports and physical activity. Am J Sports Sci Med. 2014;2(5A):48–50; doi: 10.12691/ajssm-2-5A-11.
25.
Ostojic SM, Stojanovic MD, Stojanovic V, Maric J, Njaradi N. Correlation between fitness and fatness in 6–14-year old Serbian school children. J Health Popul Nutr. 2011;29(1):53–60; doi: 10.3329/jhpn.v29i1.7566.
26.
Dencker M, Wollmer P, Karlsson MK, Lindén C, Andersen LB, Thorsson O. Body fat, abdominal fat and body fat distribution related to cardiovascular risk factors in prepubertal children. Acta Paediatr. 2012;101(8):852–857; doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2012.02681.x.
27.
Harrison F, Goodman A, van Sluijs EMF, Andersen LB, Cardon G, Davey R, et al. Weather and children’s physical activity; how and why do relationships vary between countries? Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017;14(1):74; doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0526-7.
28.
Eisenmann JC, Laurson KR, Welk GJ. Aerobic fitness percentiles for U.S. adolescents. Am J Prev Med. 2011;41(4 Suppl. 2):106–110; doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.07.005.
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
| eISSN: | 1899-1955 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
