ORIGINAL PAPER
How modifications in goals in small-sided and conditioned games in soccer influence the tactical actions of young soccer players
More details
Hide details
1
Post-Graduate Program in Exercise and Sport Sciences, Laboratory of Soccer Studies, University of Rio de Janeiro State,
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
2
Centre of Research and Studies in Soccer, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Brazil
Submission date: 2020-04-24
Acceptance date: 2020-08-10
Publication date: 2021-03-05
Hum Mov. 2021;22(3):92-100
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Purpose:
This study analysed the influence of the absence of goalkeeper and the number of goals in tactical actions in 3 configurations of small-sided and conditioned games (SSCGs): (a) goalkeeper + 3 vs. 3 + goalkeeper; (b) 3 vs. 3 (no goalkeeper); and (c) 3 vs. 3 with 2 mini goals.
Methods:
Overall, 24 under-15 soccer players were divided into 8 teams of 3 players each. Seven games were played for each configuration for a total of 21. The tactical behaviour was evaluated with the System of Tactical Assessment in Soccer (FUT-SAT).
Results:
More offensive actions were performed in the SSCGs with goalkeepers. The games played without goalkeepers led to more actions associated with defensive unity but also a higher rate of errors concerning the tactical principles of delay and defensive unity. In relation to the outcome of actions, more fouls, throw-ins, and corner kicks were observed in the SSCGs with 2 mini goals.
Conclusions:
The games played without goalkeepers reflected a higher difficulty in managing spaces of the game and led to a higher number of errors in the performance of core defensive tactical principles. In the games played with 2 mini goals, it was observed that the players on the wings were positioned closer to each other, which made the play more fragmented compared with the other conditions. In accordance with these results, it is possible to identify the influence of goalkeepers on tactical behaviour during SSCGs.
REFERENCES (28)
1.
Tan TYH, Chow JY, Duarte R, Davids K. Manipulating task constraints shapes emergence of herding tendencies in team games performance. Int J Sports Sci Coach. 2017;12(5):595–602; doi: 10.1177/1747954117727661.
2.
Travassos B, Gonçalves B, Marcelino R, Monteiro R, Sampaio J. How perceiving additional targets modifies teams’ tactical behavior during football small-sided games. Hum Mov Sci. 2014;38(1):241–250; doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2014.10.005.
3.
Sarmento H, Clemente FM, Harper LD, da Costa IT, Owen A, Figueiredo AJ. Small sided games in soccer – a systematic review. Int J Perform Anal Sport. 2018;18(5):693–749; doi: 10.1080/24748668.2018.1517288.
4.
Clemente FM, Sarmento H. The effects of small-sided soccer games on technical actions and skills: a systematic review. Hum Mov. 2020;21(3):100–119; doi: 10.5114/hm.2020.93014.
5.
Araújo D. Tactical ability development: the role of constraints in decisional behavior [in Portuguese]. Motriz. 2009;15(3):537–540; doi: 10.5016/2942.
6.
Clemente FM, Afonso J, Castillo D, Los Arcos A, Silva AF, Sarmento H. The effects of small-sided soccer games on tactical behavior and collective dynamics: a systematic review. Chaos Soliton Fract. 2020;134(1):109710; doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.109710.
7.
Teoldo I, Guilherme J, Garganta J. Training football for smart playing: on tactical performance of teams and players. Curitiba: Appris; 2017.
8.
Davids K, Araújo D, Correia V, Vilar L. How small-sided and conditioned games enhance acquisition of movement and decision-making skills. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2013;41(3):154–161; doi: 10.1097/JES.0b013e318292f3ec.
9.
Silva P, Vilar L, Davids K, Araújo D, Garganta J. Sports teams as complex adaptive systems: manipulating player numbers shapes behaviours during football small-sided games. Springerplus. 2016;5(1):191; doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-1813-5.
10.
Silva DC, Costa VT, Casanova F, Clemente FM, Teoldo I. Comparison between teams of different ranks in small-sided and conditioned games tournaments. Int J Perform Anal Sport. 2019;19(4):608–623; doi: 10.1080/24748668.2019.1643598.
11.
Bujalance-Moreno P, Latorre-Román PÁ, García-Pinillos F. A systematic review on small-sided games in football players: acute and chronic adaptations. J Sports Sci. 2019;37(8):921–949; doi: 10.1080/02640414.2018.1535821.
12.
Praça G, Barbosa GF, Murta C, Bredt SGT, Barreira D, Chagas MH, et al. Influence of floaters and positional status on players’ tactical, physical, and physiological responses in soccer small-sided games. Hum Mov. 2020; 21(3):54–63; doi: 10.5114/hm.2020.91346.
13.
Machado JC, Barreira D, Teoldo I, Travassos B, Bosco Júnior J, Santos JOL, et al. How does the adjustment of training task difficulty level influence tactical behavior in soccer? Res Q Exerc Sport. 2019;90(3):403–416; doi: 10.1080/02701367.2019.1612511.
14.
Teoldo I, Garganta J, Greco P, Mesquita I, Silva B, Müller E, et al. Analysis of tactical behaviours in smallsided soccer games: comparative study between goalposts of society soccer and futsal. Open Sports Sci J. 2010;3(1):10–12; doi: 10.2174/1875399X01003010010.
15.
Castellano J, Silva P, Usabiaga O, Barreira D. The influence of scoring targets and outer-floaters on attacking and defending team dispersion, shape and creation of space during small-sided soccer games. J Hum Kinet. 2016;51(1):153–163; doi: 10.1515/hukin-2015-0178.
16.
Ometto L, Alkmim MNR, Praca GM, Vasconcellos F. What are the most important field zones when goalposts are manipulated in soccer? Hum Mov. 2018;19(5, special issue):106–113; doi: 10.5114/hm.2018.81015.
17.
Teoldo I, Garganta J, Greco PJ, Mesquita I, Maia J. System of tactical assessment in soccer (FUT-SAT): development and preliminary validation. Motricidade. 2011;7(1):69–83; doi: 10.6063/motricidade.121.
18.
Köklü Y, Sert Ö, Alemdaroğlu U, Arslan Y. Comparison of the physiological responses and time-motion characteristics of young soccer players in small-sided games: the effect of goalkeeper. J Strength Cond Res. 2015;29(4):964–971; doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182a744a1.
19.
Mallo J, Navarro E. Physical load imposed on soccer players during small-sided training games. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2008;48(2):166–171.
20.
Clemente FM, Wong DP, Martins FML, Mendes RS. Acute effects of the number of players and scoring method on physiological, physical, and technical performance in small-sided soccer games. Res Sports Med. 2014;22(4):380–397; doi: 10.1080/15438627.2014.951761.
21.
Cohen J. A power primer. Psychol Bull. 1992;112(1):155–159; doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155.
22.
Ric A, Hristovski R, Gonçalves B, Torres L, Sampaio J, Torrents C. Timescales for exploratory tactical behavior in football small-sided games. J Sports Sci. 2016;34(18):1723–1730; doi: 10.1080/02640414.2015.1136068.
23.
Vilar L, Araújo D, Davids K, Travassos B, Duarte R, Parreira J. Interpersonal coordination tendencies supporting the creation/prevention of goal scoring opportunities in futsal. Eur J Sport Sci. 2014;14(1):28–35; doi: 10.1080/17461391.2012.725103.
24.
Silva B, Garganta J, Santos R, Teoldo I. Comparing tactical behaviour of soccer players in 3 vs. 3 and 6 vs. 6 small-sided games. J Hum Kinet. 2014;41(1):191–202; doi: 10.2478/hukin-2014-0047.
25.
Silva P, Esteves P, Correia V, Davids K, Araújo D, Garganta J. Effects of manipulations of player numbers vs. field dimensions on inter-individual coordination during small-sided games in youth football. Int J Perform Anal Sport. 2015;15(2):641–659; doi: 10.1080/24748668.2015.11868821.
26.
Silva RNB, Teoldo I, Silva DC, Ferreira LA, Dos-Santos JW. Influence of the positional role on the tactical actions of soccer players [in Portuguese]. Pensar Prát. 2018;21(3):672–682; doi: 10.5216/rpp.v21i3.50392.
27.
Afonso J, Bessa C, Nikolaidis PT, Teoldo I, Clemente FM. A systematic review of research on tactical periodization: absence of empirical data, burden of proof, and benefit of doubt. Hum Mov. 2020;21(4):37–43; doi: 10.5114/hm.2020.95329.
28.
Sarmento H, Marques A, Field A, Martins J, Gouveia ÉR, Mondagrón LP, et al. Genetic influence on football performance: a systematic review. Hum Mov. 2020;21(4):1–17; doi: 10.5114/hm.2020.94198.