ORIGINAL PAPER
An analysis of 12-hour ultramarathon performance
More details
Hide details
1
Gesundheitszentrum St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
2
Institute of Primary Care, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
3
Ultra Sports Science Foundation, Pierre-Benite, France
4
MoveAgeLab, Physical Education Sport Center of Federal University of Espirito Santo, Vitoria, ES, Brazil
5
School of Health and Caring Sciences, University of West Attica, Athens, Greece
6
Department of Physical Education, States University of Para, Para, Brazil
Submission date: 2024-06-01
Acceptance date: 2025-02-28
Online publication date: 2025-06-25
Corresponding author
Beat Knechtle
Medbase St. Gallen am Vadianplatz, Vadianstrasse 26, 9001 St. Gallen,
Switzerland
Hum Mov. 2025;26(2):46-60
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Purpose:
Ultra-marathon running is highly popular, with races including distance-limited, time-limited, and multistage events. The 12-hour run is the second shortest time-limited ultra-marathon, though little is known about the origin of athletes or where these races are preferably held. Therefore, the present study investigated where the fastest 12-hour runners originate from and where the fastest 12-hour race courses are located.
Methods:
A machine learning model based on the XG Boost algorithm was developed to predict running speed based on athlete age, sex, country of origin, and the country where the races were held. After the model was built and trained, explainability tools were used to investigate how each independent variable influenced the predicted running speed.
Results:
A total of 103,334 race records of 53,700 unique runners from 69 countries participating in races held in 55 countries were analysed. The United States of America (USA) accounted for about one-third of the 12-hour race records for country of origin and country of the event, followed by Taiwan, several European countries (e.g., Germany, France, Italy, and Norway), and others from the Anglosphere (e.g., Australia, United Kingdom, and South Africa). Athletes from Lithuania, Israel, Russia, Hungary, Croatia, and Namibia achieved the fastest average running speeds. The fastest running speeds were achieved in races held in Russia, the Netherlands, Israel, Slovakia, the Czech Republic, Croatia, and Hungary. There was a positive correlation between country of origin and country of event, indicating that athletes competed mainly in their home country. Men were about 0.5 km/h faster than women on average. Most athletes were in the 45–49 age group, while the fastest runners were in the 40–44 and 45–49 age groups.
Conclusions:
Most 12-hour ultra-marathon athletes originated from the USA and competed in the USA. However, athletes from Lithuania, Israel, Russia, Hungary, Croatia, and Namibia achieved the fastest running speeds.
REFERENCES (51)
1.
Scheer V. Participation trends of ultra endurance events. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2019;27(1):3–7; doi: 10.1097/JSA.0000000000000198.
2.
Kao WF, Shyu CL, Yang XW, Hsu TF, Chen JJ, Kao WC, Polun-Chang, Huang YJ, Kuo FC, Huang CI, Lee CH. Athletic performance and serial weight changes during 12- and 24-hour ultra-marathons. Clin J Sport Med. 2008;18(2):155–8; doi: 10.1097/JSM.0b013e31815cdd37.
3.
Hsu TF, Chen YJ, Chou SL, Kao WF, Fan JS, Chen JJ, Kuo FC, Yen DH, Huang CI. Urine output and performance of runners in a 12-hour ultramarathon. Clin J Sport Med. 2009;19(2):120–4; doi: 10.1097/JSM.0b013e3181948c28.
4.
Knechtle B, Valeri F, Nikolaidis PT, Zingg MA, Rosemann T, Rust CA. Do women reduce the gap to men in ultra-marathon running? Springerplus. 2016;5(1):672; doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-2326-y.
5.
Thuany M, Gomes TN, Villiger E, Weiss K, Scheer V, Nikolaidis PT, Knechtle B. Trends in participation, sex differences and age of peak performance in time-limited ultramarathon events: a secular analysis. Medicina. 2022;58(3):366; doi: 10.3390/medicina58030366.
6.
Sehovic E, Knechtle B, Rust CA, Rosemann T. 12- hour ultra-marathons: Increasing worldwide participation and dominance of Europeans. J Hum Sport Exerc. 2013;8(4):932–53; doi: 10.4100/jhse. 2013.84.05.
7.
Rust CA, Zingg MA, Rosemann T, Knechtle B. Will the age of peak ultra-marathon performance increase with increasing race duration? BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2014;6:36; doi: 10.1186/ 2052-1847-6-36.
8.
Knechtle B, Weiss K, Villiger E, Scheer V, Gomes TN, Gajda R, Ouerghi N, Chtourou H, Nikolaidis PT, Rosemann T, Thuany M. The sex difference in 6-h ultra-marathon running – the worldwide trends from 1982 to 2020. Medicina. 2022;58(2):179; doi: 10.3390/medicina58020179.
9.
Malcata RM, Hopkins WG. Variability of competitive performance of elite athletes: a systematic review. Sports Med. 2014;44(12):1763–74; doi: 10.1007/s40279-014-0239-x.
10.
Knechtle B, Nikolaidis PT. Physiology and pathophysiology in ultra-marathon running. Front Physiol. 2018;9:634; doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00634.
11.
XGBoost Parameters. Available from:
https://xgboost. readthedocs.io/en/stable/ (accessed 26.11. 2024).
12.
Knechtle B, Scheer V, Valero D, Vancini RL, Gajda R, Cuk I, De Lira CAB, Thuany M, Villiger E, Braschler L, Weiss K, Rosemann T, Nikolaidis PT. Analysis of the 72-h ultramarathon using a predictive XG Boost model. Sport Sci Health. 2024; 21:181–94; doi: 10.1007/s11332-024-01243-3.
13.
Knechtle B, Weiss K, Valero D, Villiger E, Nikolaidis PT, Andrade MS, Scheer V, Cuk I, Gajda R, Thuany M. Using machine learning to determine the nationalities of the fastest 100-mile ultra-marathoners and identify top racing events. PLOS ONE. 2024;19(8):e0303960; doi: 10.1371/journal. pone.0303960.
14.
Knechtle B, Valero D, Villiger E, Scheer V, Weiss K, Forte P, Thuany M, Vancini RL, de Lira CAB, Nikolaidis PT, Ouerghi N, Rosemann T. The fastest 24-hour ultramarathoners are from Eastern Europe. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):28703; doi: 10.1038/ s41598-024-75260-0.
15.
Weiss K, Valero D, Villiger E, Thuany M, Forte P, Gajda R, Scheer V, Sreckovic S, Cuk I, Nikolaidis PT, Andrade MS, Knechtle B. Analysis of over 1 million race records shows runners from East African countries as the fastest in 50-km ultramarathons. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):8006; doi: 10.1038/ s41598-024-58571-0.
17.
Weiss K, Valero D, Villiger E, Scheer V, Thuany M, Cuk I, Rosemann T, Knechtle B. The Influence of environmental conditions on pacing in age group marathoners competing in the “New York City Marathon”. Front Physiol. 2022;13:842935; doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.842935.
18.
Weiss K, Valero D, Villiger E, Thuany M, Scheer V, Cuk I, Knechtle B. Temperature and barometric pressure are related to running speed and pacing of the fastest runners in the ‘Berlin Marathon’. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2022;26(12):4177– 287; doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202206_29054.
19.
Morgan DW, Martin PE, Krahenbuhl GS. Factors affecting running economy. Sports Med. 1989; 7(5):310–30; doi: 10.2165/00007256-198907050- 00003.
20.
Sargent Megicks B, Till K, Rongen F, Cowburn I, Gledhill A, Mitchell T, Emmonds S, Lara-Bercial S. Examining European talent development environments: athlete, parent and coach perceptions. J Sports Sci. 2022;40(22):2533–43; doi: 10.1080/ 02640414.2023.2172800.
21.
Thuany M, Weiss K, Villiger E, Scheer V, Ouerghi N, Gomes TN, Knechtle B. A macro to micro analysis to understand performance in 100-mile ultramarathons worldwide. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):1415; doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-28398-2.
22.
Hoffman MD. Performance trends in 161-km ultramarathons. Int J Sports Med. 2010;31(1):31–7; doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1239561.
23.
The state of running 2019. Available from: https:// runrepeat.com/state-of-running (accessed 28.11. 2024).
24.
Hoffman MD, Wegelin JA. The Western States 100-Mile Endurance Run: participation and performance trends. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009; 41(12):2191–8; doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181a 8d553.
25.
Appel M, Zentgraf K, Kruger K, Alack K. Effects of genetic variation on endurance performance, muscle strength, and injury susceptibility in sports: a systematic review. Front Physiol. 2021;12:694411; doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.694411.
26.
Fisher JP, Csapo R. Periodization and programming in sports. Sports. 2021;9(2):13; doi: 10.3390/ sports9020013.
27.
Halson SL. Monitoring training load to understand fatigue in athletes. Sports Med. 2014;44 (Suppl 2):139–47; doi: 10.1007/s40279-014-0253-z.
28.
Purcell R, Gwyther K, Rice SM. Mental health in elite athletes: increased awareness requires an early intervention framework to respond to athlete needs. Sports Med Open. 2019;5(1):46; doi: 10.1186/s40798-019-0220-1.
29.
Coates AM, Berard JA, King TJ, Burr JF. Physiological determinants of ultramarathon trail-running performance. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2021;16(10):1454–61; doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2020- 0766.
30.
Waśkiewicz Z, Nikolaidis PT, Chalabaev A, Rosemann T, Knechtle B. Motivation in ultra-marathon runners. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2018;12: 31–37; doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S189061.
31.
Harris KM, McDade TW. The biosocial approach to human development, behavior, and health across the life course. RSF. 2018;4(4):2–26; doi: 10.7758/RSF.2018.4.4.01.
32.
Hughes DC, Ellefsen S, Baar K. Adaptations to endurance and strength training. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2018;8(6):a029769; doi: 10.1101/ cshperspect.a029769.
33.
Varillas-Delgado D, Del Coso J, Gutierrez-Hellin J, Aguilar-Navarro M, Munoz A, Maestro A, Morencos E. Genetics and sports performance: the present and future in the identification of talent for sports based on DNA testing. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2022;122(8):1811–30; doi: 10.1007/s00421- 022-04945-z.
34.
Buck K, Spittler J, Reed A, Khodaee M. Psychological Attributes of Ultramarathoners. Wilderness Environ Med. 2018 Mar;29(1):66-71. doi: 10.1016/j.wem.2017.09.003. Epub 2018 Jan 12. PMID: 29336959.
35.
Roebuck GS, Fitzgerald PB, Urquhart DM, Ng S-K, Cicuttini FM, Fitzgibbon BM. The psychology of ultra-marathon runners: a systematic review. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2018;37:43–58; doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2018.04.004.
36.
Meeusen R, Van Cutsem J, Roelands B. Endurance exercise-induced and mental fatigue and the brain. Exp Physiol. 2021;106(12):2294–8; doi: 10.1113/EP088186.
37.
Kazimierczak M, Dąbrowska A, Adamczewska K, Malchrowicz-Mośko E. The impact of modern ultramarathons on shaping the social identity of runners. The case study of Karkonosze Winter Ultramarathon. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;17(1):116; doi: 10.3390/ijerph17010116.
38.
Uğraş S, Mergan B, Celik T, Hidayat Y, Ozman C, Ustun UD. The relationship between passion and athlete identity in sport: the mediating and moderating role of dedication. BMC Psychol. 2024; 12(1):76; doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-01565-4.
39.
Oksanen A, Celuch M, Oksa R, Savolainen I. Online communities come with real-world consequences for individuals and societies. Commun Psychol. 2024;2(1):71; doi: 10.1038/s44271-024- 00112-6.
40.
Buck K, Spittler J, Reed A, Khodaee M. Psychological attributes of ultramarathoners. Wilderness Environ Med. 2018;29(1):66–71; doi: 10.1016/ j.wem.2017.09.003.
41.
Reiss D, Neiderhiser JM. The interplay of genetic influences and social processes in developmental theory: specific mechanisms are coming into view. Dev Psychopathol. 2000;12(3):357–74; doi: 10.1017/s0954579400003060.
42.
Besson T, Macchi R, Rossi J, Morio CYM, Kunimasa Y, Nicol C, Vercruyssen F, Millet GY. Sex differences in endurance running. Sports Med. 2022;52(6):1235–57; doi: 10.1007/s40279-022- 01651-w.
43.
Hallam LC, Amorim FT. Expanding the gap: an updated look into sex differences in running performance. Front Physiol. 2022;12:804149; doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.804149.
44.
Mauvais-Jarvis F. Sex differences in energy metabolism: natural selection, mechanisms and consequences. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2024;20(1):56–69; doi: 10.1038/s41581-023-00781-2.
45.
Bassett AJ, Ahlmen A, Rosendorf JM, Romeo AA, Erickson BJ, Bishop ME. The biology of sex and sport. JBJS Rev. 2020;8(3):e0140; doi: 10.2106/ JBJS.RVW.19.00140.
46.
Le Mat F, Gery M, Besson T, Ferdynus C, Bouscaren N, Millet GY. Running endurance in women compared to men: retrospective analysis of matched real-world big data. Sports Med. 2023;53(4):917– 26; doi: 10.1007/s40279-023-01813-4.
47.
Stewart R, Wright B, Smith L, Roberts S, Russell N. Gendered stereotypes and norms: a systematic review of interventions designed to shift attitudes and behaviour. Heliyon. 2021;7(4):e06660; doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06660.
48.
Fullagar HHK, McCall A, Impellizzeri FM, Favero T, Coutts AJ. The translation of sport science research to the field: a current opinion and overview on the perceptions of practitioners, researchers and coaches. Sports Med. 2019;49(12):1817– 24; doi: 10.1007/s40279-019-01139-0.
49.
McKay Bowen C. Significant strides: women’s advancement in endurance sports. Significance. 2024; 21:18–21; doi: 10.1093/jrssig/qmae041.
50.
Hunter SK, S Angadi S, Bhargava A, Harper J, Hirschberg AL, D Levine B, L Moreau K, J Nokoff N, Stachenfeld NS, Bermon S. The biological basis of sex differences in athletic performance: consensus statement for the American College of Sports Medicine. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2023;55 (12):2328–60; doi: 10.1249/MSS.00000000000 03300.
51.
Akkari A, Machin D, Tanaka H. Greater progression of athletic performance in older Masters athletes. Age Ageing. 2015;44(4):683–6; doi: 10.1093/ ageing/afv023.