ORIGINAL PAPER
The influence of a visual target point on the onset of visual regulation and kinematics on the approach run while performing the Tsukahara vault in artistic gymnastics
1
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
Submission date: 2024-06-30
Acceptance date: 2025-02-28
Online publication date: 2025-06-25
Corresponding author
Hum Mov. 2025;26(2):26-32
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Purpose:
The study examined if a visual target for the hurdle take-off affects the onset of visual regulation and hurdle kinematics during the approach run in a vaulting event.
Methods:
Ten high-level male artistic gymnasts (23.9 ± 4.2 years; body mass = 63.7 ± 6.4 kg; body height = 168.00 ± 0.11 cm) performed the Tsukahara vault using a visual target marking the last touchdown of the approach run and the commencement of the hurdle (tape condition) and under standard vaulting regulations (non-tape condition). Gymnast’s trials were performed under training conditions, with five high-speed cameras (four stationary and one panning) used for the collection of the spatiotemporal characteristics of the approach run and hurdle.
Results:
Although a faster onset of visual regulation was revealed in the tape condition, no statistically significant differences were found between the two conditions in the kinematic characteristics of athletes’ run-ups. Furthermore, the profile of the average standard deviation for the contact positions of gymnasts’ feet/soles differed in the two examined conditions.
Conclusions:
The presence of a visual target positively affected the onset of visual regulation when high-level artistic gymnasts performed the Tsukahara vault.
The study examined if a visual target for the hurdle take-off affects the onset of visual regulation and hurdle kinematics during the approach run in a vaulting event.
Methods:
Ten high-level male artistic gymnasts (23.9 ± 4.2 years; body mass = 63.7 ± 6.4 kg; body height = 168.00 ± 0.11 cm) performed the Tsukahara vault using a visual target marking the last touchdown of the approach run and the commencement of the hurdle (tape condition) and under standard vaulting regulations (non-tape condition). Gymnast’s trials were performed under training conditions, with five high-speed cameras (four stationary and one panning) used for the collection of the spatiotemporal characteristics of the approach run and hurdle.
Results:
Although a faster onset of visual regulation was revealed in the tape condition, no statistically significant differences were found between the two conditions in the kinematic characteristics of athletes’ run-ups. Furthermore, the profile of the average standard deviation for the contact positions of gymnasts’ feet/soles differed in the two examined conditions.
Conclusions:
The presence of a visual target positively affected the onset of visual regulation when high-level artistic gymnasts performed the Tsukahara vault.
REFERENCES (35)
1.
Dillman CJ, Cheetham PJ, Smith S. A kinematic analysis of men’s Olympic long horse vaulting. J Appl Biomech. 1985;1(2):96–110; doi: 10.1123/ ijsb.1.2.96.
2.
Weyand, PG, Sternlight DB , Bellizzi MJ, Wright S. Faster top running speeds are achieved with greater ground forces not more rapid leg movements. J Appl Physiol. 2000;89(5):1991–9; doi: 10.1152/ jappl.2000.89.5.1991.
3.
Takei Y. Techniques used by elite women gymnasts performing the handspring vault at the 1987 Pan American games. Int J Sport Biomech. 1990;6(1): 29–55; doi: 10.1123/ijsb.6.1.29.
4.
Sands WA, McNeal JR. The relationship of vault run speeds and flight duration to score. Technique. 1995;15:8–10.
5.
Bradshaw E. Gymnastics. Sports Biomech. 2004; 3(1):125–44; doi: 10.1080/14763140408522834.
6.
Dallas G, Theodorou A. The influence of a hurdle target point on the kinematics of the handspring vault approach run during training. Sports Biomech. 2020;19(4):467–82; doi: 10.1080/1476314 1.2018.1497196.
7.
Heinen T, Vinken PM, Jeraj D, Velentzas K. Movement regulation of handsprings on vault. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2013;84(1):68–78; doi: 10.1080/02 701367.2013.762300.
8.
Williams AM, Davids K, Williams JG. Visual Perception and Action in Sport. New York: Taylor and Francis; 1999, pp. 198–199.
9.
Bradshaw EJ, Sparrow WA. Effects of approach velocity and foot-target characteristics on the visual regulation of step length. Hum Mov Sci. 2001; 20(4–5):401–26; doi: 10.1016/s0167-9457(01)00 060-4.
10.
Gibson EJ, Pick AD. An Ecological Approach to Perceptual Learning and Development. New York: Oxford University Press; 2000.
11.
De Rugy A, Montagne G, Beukers MJ, Laurent M. The control of human locomotor pointing under restricted informational conditions. Neurosci Lett. 2000;281(2–3):87–90; doi: 10.1016/s0304-3940 (00)00827-2.
12.
Montagne G, Cornus S, Glize D, Quaine F, Laurent M. A perception – action coupling type of control in long jump. J Motor Behav. 2000;37–43.
13.
Berg WP, Greer NL. A kinematic profile of the approach run of novice long jumpers. J Appl Biomech. 1995;11(2):142–62; doi: 10.1123/jab.11.2.142.
14.
Bradshow E, Aisbett B. Visual guidance during competition performance and run-through training in long jumping. Sports Biomech. 2006;5(1): 1–14; doi: 10.1080/14763141.2006.9628221.
15.
Hay JG. Approach strategies in the long jump. Int J Sport Biomech. 1988;4(2):114–29; doi: 10.11 23/ijsb.4.2.114.
16.
Hay JG, Koh TJ. Evaluating the approach in the horizontal jumps. Int J Sport Biomech. 1988;4(4): 372–92; doi: 10.1123/ijsb.4.4.372.
17.
Scott MA, Li F, Davids K. Expertise and the regulation of gait in the approach phase of the long jump. J Sports Sci. 1997;15(6):597–605; doi: 10.10 80/026404197367038.
18.
Heinen T, Artmann I, Brinker A, Nicolaus M. Task dependency of movement regulation in female gymnastics vaulting. Balt J Health Phys Act. 2015; 7(4):61–72; doi: 10.29359/BJHPA.07.4.06.
19.
Renshaw I, Davids K. A comparison of locomotor pointing strategies in cricket bowling and long jumping. Int J Sport Psychol. 2006;37:1–20.
20.
Prassas S, Kwon YH, Sands WA. Biomechanical research in artistic gymnastics: a review. Sports Biomech. 2006;5(2):261–91; doi: 10.1080/14763 140608522878.
21.
Takei Y, Blucker EP, Dunn JH, Myers SA, Fortney VL. A three-dimensional analysis of the men’s compulsory vault performed at the 1992 Olympic Games. J Appl Biomech. 1996;12(2):237–57; doi: 10.1123/jab.12.2.237.
22.
Theodorou A, Skordilis E, Plainis S, Panoutsakopoylos V, Panteli F. Influence of visual impairment level on the regulatory mechanism used during the approach phase of a long jump. Percept Mot Skills. 2013;117(1):31–45; doi: 10.2466/30. 24.pms.117x11z6.
24.
Meeuwsen H, Magill R. The role of vision in gait control during gymnastics vaulting. In: Hoshizaki TB , Salmela JH, Petiot B. (eds.). Diagnostics. Treatment and Analysis of Gymnastics talent. Montreal: Sport Psyche Editions; 1987, pp. 137–55.
25.
Bohne M, Mecham C, Mitchell K, Abendroth- Smith J. A biomechanical analysis of the Yurchenko layout vault. Res Quart Exe Sport. 2000;71(1).
26.
Berg WP, Wade MG, Greer NL. (1994). Visual regulation of gait in bipedal locomotion: revisiting Lee, Lishman, and Thomson (1982). J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1994;20(4):854–63; doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.20.4.854.
27.
Lee DN, Lishman JR, Thomson JA. Regulation of gait in long jumping. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1982;8(3):448–59; doi: 10.1037/0096- 1523.8.3.448.
28.
Hay JG. The Biomechanics of Sports Techniques. 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall; 1978, pp. 297–9.
29.
Fujihara T, Yamamoto E, Fuchimoto T. Run-up velocity in the gymnastics vault and its measurement. Jap J Phys Educ Health Sport Sci. 2017;62(2): 435–53; doi: 10.5432/jjpehss.16103.
30.
Veličković S, Petković D, Petković E. A case study about differences in characteristics of the run-up approach on the vault between top-class and middle- class gymnasts. Sci Gym J. 2011;3(1):25–34; doi: 10.52165/sgj.3.1.25-34.
31.
Heinen T, Brinker A, Mack M, Hennig L. The role of positional environmental cues in movement regulation of Yurchenko vaults in gymnastics. Sci Gym J. 2017;9(2):113–26.
33.
Berg WP, Mark LS. Information for step length adjustment in running. Hum Mov Sci. 2005;24(4): 496–531; doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2005.07.002.
34.
Barrero J, Casanova F, Peixoto C, Fawver B, Williams AM. How task constrains influence the gaze and motor behaviors of elite-level gymnasts. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(13):6941; doi: 10.3390/ijerph18136941.
35.
Heinen T, Jeraj D, Thoeren M, Vinken PM. Targetdirected running in gymnastics: The role of the springboard position as an informational source to regulate handsprings on vault. Biol Sport. 2011; 28(4):215–21.
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
| eISSN: | 1899-1955 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
