ORIGINAL PAPER
Movement pattern and horizontal impulse responses to airflow in three trained middle-distance runners: an exploratory case series
 
More details
Hide details
1
Faculty of Sport, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
 
2
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
 
3
Department of Individual and Team Physical Activities, Wroclaw University of Health and Sport Sciences, Wrocław, Poland
 
 
Submission date: 2026-10-07
 
 
Acceptance date: 2026-10-22
 
 
Online publication date: 2026-11-09
 
 
Corresponding author
Krzysztof Maćkała   

Department of Individual and Team Physical Activities, Wroclaw University of Health and Sport Sciences, Al. Ignacego Jana Paderewskiego 35, 51-612 Wrocław, Poland
 
 
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Purpose:
This study aimed to examine, in an exploratory secondary analysis, whether signed airflow was linearly associated with horizontal impulse balance in three trained middle-distance runners and whether the accompanying multivariate movement-pattern responses were similarly organised.

Material and methods:
Three trained male runners (22–28 years) completed one 3-min trial per condition in randomised athlete-specific sequences. Thirteen completed athlete-condition records covered airflow velocities of –7, –5, 0, +3, and +5 m · s–1. Twenty consecutive valid steps from the final minute were averaged for each condition. A pooled within-athlete linear slope for the propulsive-to-braking impulse ratio was tested with a conditional exact randomisation procedure.

Results:
The impulse ratio decreased by 0.0665 per 1 m · s–1 progression from headwind towards tailwind (95% conditional randomisation interval: –0.0819 to –0.0517; exact p = 0.000014). Individual slopes were negative in all three athletes. Propulsive impulse decreased and braking impulse increased, both associations persisting after Holm correction; temporal-spatial outcomes showed no adjusted statistical association. The response-vector analysis was exploratory and hypothesis-generating.

Conclusions:
Signed airflow was associated with a directionally consistent redistribution of horizontal impulse in the three investigated athletes. These observations do not establish a population effect or a stable individual characteristic and require confirmation with repeated trials and larger samples.
REFERENCES (30)
1.
van Oeveren BT, de Ruiter CJ, Beek PJ, van Dieën JH. The biomechanics of running and running styles: a synthesis. Sports Biomech. 2024;23(4):516–54; doi: 10.1080/14763141.2021.1873411.
 
2.
Gindre C, Lussiana T, Breine B, Patoz A. Mind to move: a narrative review of individualized running biomechanics beyond the spring-mass model. Sports Med. 2026;56(9):2121–38; doi: 10.1007/s40279-026-02449-w.
 
3.
Hoitz F, von Tscharner V, Baltich J, Nigg BM. Individuality decoded by running patterns: movement characteristics that determine the uniqueness of human running. PLOS ONE. 2021;16(4):e0249657; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249657.
 
4.
Patoz A, Lussiana T, Breine B, Gindre C, Hébert-Losier K. There is no global running pattern more economic than another at endurance running speeds. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2022;17(4):659–62; doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2021-0345.
 
5.
Pecchiari MM, Legramandi MA, Gibertini G, Ca­vagna GA. Still air resistance during walking and running. Proc Biol Sci. 2023; 290(2013);20231763; doi: 10.1098/rspb.2023.1763.
 
6.
Davies CTM. Effects of wind assistance and resistance on the forward motion of a runner. J Appl Physiol. 1980;48(4):702–9; doi: 10.1152/jappl.1980.48.4.702.
 
7.
Pugh LGCE. Oxygen intake in track and treadmill running with observations on the effect of air resistance. J Physiol. 1970;207(3):823–35; doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1970.sp009097.
 
8.
da Silva ES, Kram R, Hoogkamer W. The metabolic cost of emulated aerodynamic drag forces in marathon running. J Appl Physiol. 2022;133(3):766–76; doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00086.2022.
 
9.
Yamashita N, Ly CL, Smallcombe JW, Hodder S, Havenith G. Air speed and direction affect metabolic and thermoregulatory responses during walking and running in a temperate environment. J Appl Physiol. 2024;137(3):554–68; doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00159.2024.
 
10.
Mesquita RM, Willems PA, Catavitello G, Gibertini G, Natalucci V, Luciano F, Minetti AE, Pavei G, Dewolf AH. Biomechanics of human locomotion in the wind. J Appl Physiol. 2024;137(3):616–28; doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00253.2024.
 
11.
Steele JR, VanKeersbilck L, Bruening D, Gifford J, Seeley M, Hunter I. How oxygen uptake, ground reaction forces, and kinematics respond to air resistance and drafting during treadmill running. J Appl Biomech. 2025;41(6):511–18; doi: 10.1123/jab.2024-0316.
 
12.
Weyand PG, Sternlight DB, Bellizzi MJ, Wright S. Faster top running speeds are achieved with greater ground forces not more rapid leg movements. J Appl Physiol. 2000;89(5):1991–99; doi: 10.1152/jappl.2000.89.5.1991.
 
13.
Širok B, Gostiša J, Sečnik M, Mackala K, Čoh M. Application of wind tunnel device for evaluation of biokinetic parameters of running. Symmetry. 2021;13(3):505; doi: 10.3390/sym13030505.
 
14.
McKay AKA, Stellingwerff T, Smith ES, Martin DT, Mujika I, Goosey-Tolfrey VL, Sheppard J, Burke LM. Defining training and performance caliber: a participant classification framework. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2022;17(2):317–31; doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2021-0451.
 
15.
Zhang Y, Zhao Q. What is a randomization test? J Am Stat Assoc. 2023;118(544):2928–42; doi: 10.1080/01621459.2023.2199814.
 
16.
Holm S. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand J Stat. 1979;6(2):65–70.
 
17.
Beaumont F, Polidori G. Aerodynamic challenges in running: understanding headwind and tailwind effects. Int J Sports Sci Coach. 2025;20(3):1259–67; doi: 10.1177/17479541251333944.
 
18.
Forte P, Sousa N, Teixeira J, Marinho D, Monteiro A, Bragada J, Morais J, Barbosa T. Aerodynamic analysis of human walking, running and sprinting by numerical simulations. Acta Bioeng Biomech. 2022;24(3):3–11; doi: 10.37190/ABB-02019-2022-06.
 
19.
Inoue T, Okayama T, Teraoka T, Maeno S, Hirata K. Wind-tunnel experiment on aerodynamic characteristics of a runner using a moving-belt system. Cogent Eng. 2016;3(1):1231389; doi: 10.1080/23311916.2016.1231389.
 
20.
Steele JR, VanKeersbilck L, Hunter I. Air resistance modulates horizontal ground reaction forces during treadmill running. J Biomech. 2025;193:113014; doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.113014.
 
21.
Moore IS. Is there an economical running technique? A review of modifiable biomechanical factors affecting running economy. Sports Med. 2016;46(6):793–807; doi: 10.1007/s40279-016-0474-4.
 
22.
Folland JP, Allen SJ, Black MI, Handsaker JC, Forrester SE. Running technique is an important component of running economy and performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2017;49(7):1412–23; doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001245.
 
23.
Ross R, Goodpaster BH, Koch LG, Sarzynski MA, Kohrt WM, Johannsen NM, Skinner JS, Castro A, Irving BA, Noland RC, Sparks LM, Spielmann G, Day AG, Pitsch W, Hopkins WG, Bouchard C. Precision exercise medicine: understanding exercise response variability. Br J Sports Med. 2019;53(18):1141–53; doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2018-100328.
 
24.
Atkinson G, Batterham AM. True and false interindividual differences in the physiological response to an intervention. Exp Physiol. 2015;100(6):577–88; doi: 10.1113/EP085070.
 
25.
Tanji F, Ohnuma H, Ando R, Yamanaka R, Ikeda T, Suzuki Y. Longer ground contact time is related to a superior running economy in highly trained distance runners. J Strength Cond Res. 2024;38(5):985–90; doi: 10.1519/JSC.000000000000473.
 
26.
Krzysztofik M, Jopek M, Mroczek D, Matusiński A, Zając A. Sprint performance following plyometric conditioning activity in elite sprinters. Balt J Health Phys Act. 2024;16(1):7; doi: 10.29359/BJHPA.16.1.07.
 
27.
Jopek M, Krzysztofik M, Mroczek D, Zajac A, Mackala K. The influence of functional kinematic asymmetry on maximum speed performance in repeated sprints. Biol Sport. 2026;43:911–19; doi: 10.5114/biolsport.2026.158304.
 
28.
Jopek M, Krzysztofik M, Mroczek D, Zajac A, Mackala K. Variability of the sprint step movement pattern and its association with hamstring injury risk. J Clin Med. 2026;15(1):281; doi: 10.3390/jcm15010281.
 
29.
Saga N, Sanada J, Saga T, Satoh T. Aerodynamic characteristics of runners in long-distance running with platooning. Meas Sens. 2025;38(Suppl.):101853; doi: 10.1016/j.measen.2025.101853.
 
30.
Van Hooren B, Fuller JT, Buckley JD, Miller JR, Sewell K, Rao G, Barton C, Bishop C, Willy RW. Is motorized treadmill running biomechanically comparable to overground running? A systematic review and meta-analysis of cross-over studies. Sports Med. 2020;50(4):785–13; doi: 10.1007/s40279-019-01237-z.
 
eISSN:1899-1955
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top