ORIGINAL PAPER
Evidence of content, concurrent criterion validity, and reliability in a chassè checklist
1
Department of Physical Education, School of Physical Education, Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy,
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
2
Department of Physical Education, Universidade Salgado de Oliveira, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
3
Department of Physical Education, Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso, Cuiabá, Brazil
4
Department of Sport, Escola Superior de Educação Física, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil
5
Health Center, Fundação de Ensino e Pesquisa do Sul de Minas- Centro Universitário do Sul de Minas, Varginha, Brazil
6
Instituto de Ciências Sociais, Educação e Zootecnia, Universidade Federal do Amazonas, Manaus, Brazil
7
Department of Sports, School of Physical Education, Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Universidade Federal
de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
8
Department of Gymnastic and Health, Escola Superior de Educação Física, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil
Submission date: 2019-02-21
Acceptance date: 2020-05-16
Publication date: 2021-02-17
Hum Mov. 2021;22(3):62-69
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Purpose:
This study aims to verify the evidence of content, concurrent criterion validity, and reliability in a chassè checklist.
Methods:
First, 3 judges measured 11 items of the checklist based on the Likert scale, varying from 1 (not at all) to 5 (very much clear, pertinent, and representative), for the content evidence validity. In the second stage, 91 girls (12 ± 2.09 years old) were evaluated while performing the skill; 51 of them were skilled and 40 were novice in polka type chassè (concurrent evidence). Concerning reliability, 3 evaluators analysed the videos of 5 volunteers while performing polka type chassè at 2 different times, with an interval of 1 week between evaluations.
Results:
After the first stage, 1 item presented the content validity coefficient of 0.56 and it was reformulated as well as the skill was renamed to polka type chassè. The second assessment presented clear, pertinent, and representative items of the instrument. The reliability was considered appropriate by the inter-judge intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.83 and the lowest intra-judge ICC of 0.80. Lastly, concurrent evidence was better when it came to skilled participants than novice ones related to polka type chassè.
Conclusions:
In general, the results indicated content and concurrent validity and reliability evidence. The instrument can be useful for physical education teachers as well as gymnastics coaches.
This study aims to verify the evidence of content, concurrent criterion validity, and reliability in a chassè checklist.
Methods:
First, 3 judges measured 11 items of the checklist based on the Likert scale, varying from 1 (not at all) to 5 (very much clear, pertinent, and representative), for the content evidence validity. In the second stage, 91 girls (12 ± 2.09 years old) were evaluated while performing the skill; 51 of them were skilled and 40 were novice in polka type chassè (concurrent evidence). Concerning reliability, 3 evaluators analysed the videos of 5 volunteers while performing polka type chassè at 2 different times, with an interval of 1 week between evaluations.
Results:
After the first stage, 1 item presented the content validity coefficient of 0.56 and it was reformulated as well as the skill was renamed to polka type chassè. The second assessment presented clear, pertinent, and representative items of the instrument. The reliability was considered appropriate by the inter-judge intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.83 and the lowest intra-judge ICC of 0.80. Lastly, concurrent evidence was better when it came to skilled participants than novice ones related to polka type chassè.
Conclusions:
In general, the results indicated content and concurrent validity and reliability evidence. The instrument can be useful for physical education teachers as well as gymnastics coaches.
REFERENCES (19)
1.
Magill RA, Anderson DI. Motor learning and control: concepts and applications, 11th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Education; 2017.
2.
Newell KM, Rovegno I. Commentary – motor learning: theory and practice. Quest. 1990;42(2):184–192.
3.
Newell KM. Change in motor learning: a coordination and control perspective. Motriz. 2003;9(1):1–6; doi: 10.5016/1134.
4.
Merbah S, Meulemans T. Learning a motor skill: effects of blocked versus random practice. A review. Psychologica Belgica. 2011;51(1):15–48; doi: 10.5334/pb-51-1-15.
5.
Thomas JR, Nelson JK, Silverman SJ. Research methods in physical activity. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 2005.
6.
Yun J, Ulrich DA. Estimating measurement validity: a tutorial. Adapt Phys Activ Q. 2002;19(1):32–47; doi: 10.1123/apaq.19.1.32.
7.
De Souza Nunes ME, Gehring PR, Basso L, Oliveira da Fonseca MC, Thomazi MG, Santos S. Development and validation of an instrument to assess movement quality of the basketball free throw shooting [in Portuguese]. Motriz. 2012;18(4):627–635; doi: 10.1590/S1980-65742012000400001.
8.
Magarotto Junior LA, Deprá PP. Validating a checklist for the qualitative analysis of volleyball reception [in Portuguese]. Motriz. 2010;16(3):571–579; doi: 10.5016/1980-6574.2010v16n3p571.
9.
Pasquali L. Psychometrics. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2009;43(Special):992–999; doi: 10.1590/S0080-62342009000500002.
10.
Faro AJ, Sampaio LP. Ballet and dance dictionary [in Portuguese]. Rio de Janeiro: Jorge Zahar; 1989.
11.
Balbinotti MAA, Benetti C, Soares Terra PR. Translation and validation of the Graham-Harvey survey for the Brazilian context. Int J Manag Finance. 2007;3(1):26–48; doi: 10.1108/17439130710721644.
12.
Ericsson KA, Nandagopal K, Roring RW. Toward a science of exceptional achievement: attaining superior performance through deliberate practice. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009;1172:199–217; doi: 10.1196/annals.1393.001.
13.
Hernández-Nieto R. Contributions to statistical analysis. Mérida: Universidad de Los Andes; 2002.
14.
Commenges D, Jacqmin H. The intraclass correlation coefficient: distribution-free definition and test. Biometrics. 1994;50(2):517–526; doi: 10.2307/2533395.
15.
Weir JP. Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. J Strength Cond Res. 2005;19(1):231–240; doi: 10.1519/15184.1.
16.
Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull. 1979;86(2):420–428; doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.86.2.420.
17.
Valentini NC, Barbosa MLL, Cini GV, Pick RK, Spessato BC, Balbinotti MAA. Test of Gross Motor Development: expert validity, confirmatory validity and internal consistence [in Portuguese]. Rev Bras Cineantropom Desempenho Hum. 2008;10(4):399–404; doi: 10.5007/1980-0037.2008v10n4p399.
18.
Pasquali L, Primi R. Basic theory of item response theory – IRT [in Portuguese]. Aval Psicol. 2003;2(2):99–110.
19.
Lima EP, Vasconcelos AG, Barreto SM, Assunção AÁ. Checklist of occupational traumatic events for emergency professionals: adaptation and validation [in Portuguese]. Aval Psicol. 2016;15(3):391–401; doi: 10.15689/ap.2016.1503.12.
| eISSN: | 1899-1955 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
