ORIGINAL PAPER
Contribution of some physical characteristics to unipedal non-dominant lower limb balance among footballers
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Physiotherapy, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria
 
 
Submission date: 2018-04-19
 
 
Acceptance date: 2018-06-27
 
 
Publication date: 2018-08-13
 
 
Hum Mov. 2018;19(4):71-78
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Purpose:
The objective was to determine the correlations between age, body mass index, foot length, tibia length, and calf circumference – and unipedal non-dominant lower limb balance (UNLLB), on the basis of the contributions of each physical attribute to UNLLB performance among professional football players in a Nigerian National Football League club.

Methods:
This descriptive correlational study involved 32 purposively recruited male professional football players who met the inclusion criteria. The participants’ age was recorded along with height, weight, foot length, tibia length, and calf circumference, measured with standardized procedures, while their UNLLB was assessed with the use of a Wii Balance Board. The primary outcome measure was UNLLB, reflecting the centre of pressure parameters. The data were analysed with the Spearman rank order correlation; stepwise multiple linear regression analysis was used to explore the contributions of the selected variables to UNLLB at 0.05 alpha levels.

Results:
All physical attributes except age were significantly correlated with UNLLB. The stepwise regression analysis showed limb length (13.2%, p = 0.023, f2 = 0.191), calf circumference (22.3%, p = 0.004, f2 = 0.329), and weight (11.5%, p = 0.033, f2 = 0.167) to be significant contributors to UNLLB with visual input allowed, while tibia length (14.9%, p = 0.017, f2 = 0.215) and foot length (9.5%, p = 0.048, f2 = 0.142) were significant predictors with visual input denied.

Conclusions:
Limb length, calf circumference, body weight, tibia length, and foot length are significant predictors of UNLLB among professional footballers.

 
REFERENCES (53)
1.
Ogwumike OO , Tijani A. Balance performance of professional footballers with long-term lower limb musculoskeletal injury. Afr J Physiother Rehab Sci. 2011;3(1): 23–27; doi: 10.4314/ajprs.v3i1.5.
 
2.
Hoff J, Helgerud J. Endurance and strength training for soccer players: physiological considerations. Sports.
 
3.
Med. 2004;34(3):165–180; doi: 10.2165/00007256-200434030-00003.
 
4.
Fletcher IM, Long CS. The effects of kicking leg preference on balance ability in elite soccer players. J Athl.
 
5.
Enhancement. 2013;2(3):3–6; doi: 10.4172/2324-9080.1000114.
 
6.
Chu D, Held J. Objective assessment of the ACL-injured patient: weight bearing, steeping up/down and lunging. Neurocom Int. 1999;1:1–11.
 
7.
Riemann BL, Myers JB, Lephart SM. Comparison of the ankle, knee, hip, and trunk corrective action shown during single-leg stance on firm, foam, and multiaxial surfaces. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84(1):90–.
 
8.
95; doi: 10.1053/apmr.2003.50004.
 
9.
Faude O, Junge A, Kindermann W, Dvorak J. Risk factors for injuries in elite female soccer players. Br J Sports Med. 2006;40(9):785–790; doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2006.027540.
 
10.
Barone R, Macaluso F, Traina M, Leonardi V, Farina F,.
 
11.
Di Felice V. Soccer players have a better standing balance in nondominant one-legged stance. Open Access.
 
12.
J Sports Med. 2010;2:1–6; doi: 10.2147/OAJSM.S12593.
 
13.
Cote KP, Brunet ME, Gansneder BM, Shultz SJ. Effects of pronated and supinated foot postures on static.
 
14.
and dynamic postural stability. J Athl Train. 2005; 40(1):41–46.
 
15.
Greve JMD, Cuğ M, Dülgeroğlu D, Brech GC, Alonso AC. Relationship between anthropometric factors, gender, and balance under unstable conditions in young adults. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:850424; doi: 10.1155/2013/850424.
 
16.
Hobbs ML. Dynamic balance and basketball education program on static balance skills of playing ability.
 
17.
MSc dissertation. San Marcos: Texas State University; 2008.
 
18.
Tabrizi HB, Abbasi A, Sarvestani HJ. Comparing the static and dynamic balances and their relationship with the anthropometrical characteristics in the athletes of selected sports. Middle-East J Sci Res. 2013;15(2):.
 
19.
216–221; doi: 10.5829/idosi.mejsr.2013.15.2.7426.
 
20.
Plisky PJ, Gorman PP, Butler RJ, Kiesel KB, Underwood FB, Elkins B. The reliability of an instrumented.
 
21.
device for measuring components of the star excursion balance test. N Am J Sports Phys Ther. 2009;4(2):.
 
22.
92–99.
 
23.
Bhat R, Moiz JA. Comparison of dynamic balance in collegiate field hockey and football players using star.
 
24.
excursion balance test. Asian J Sports Med. 2013;4(3): 221–229.
 
25.
International Society for the Advancement of Kinanthropometry (ISAK). International standards for anthropometric assessment. Underdale: ISAK; 2001.
 
26.
Bartlett HL, Ting LH, Bingham JT. Accuracy of force and center of pressure measures of the Wii Balance.
 
27.
Board. Gait Posture. 2014;39(1):224–228; doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.07.010.
 
28.
Sgrò F, Monteleone G, Pavone M, Lipoma M. Validity analysis of Wii Balance Board versus baropodometer.
 
29.
platform using an open custom integrated application. AASR I Procedia. 2014;8:22–29; doi: 10.1016/j.
 
30.
aasri.2014.08.005.
 
31.
Clark RA, Bryant AL, Pua Y, McCrory P, Bennell K, Hunt M. Validity and reliability of the Nintendo Wii Balance Board for assessment of standing balance. Gait Posture. 2010;31(3):307–310; doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.
 
32.
11.012.
 
33.
National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Anthropometry procedures manual. 2004. Available.
 
35.
Räty HP, Impivaara O, Karppi SL. Dynamic balance in former elite male athletes and in community control.
 
36.
subjects. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2002;12(2):111–116; doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0838.2002.120208.x.
 
37.
Vieira Tde M, de Oliveira LF, Nadal J. An overview of age-related changes in postural control during quiet.
 
38.
standing tasks using classical and modern stabilometric descriptors. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2009;19(6):e513–e519; doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2008.10.007.
 
39.
Adegoke BO A, Babatunde FO, Oyeyemi AL. Pain, balance, self-reported function and physical function in.
 
40.
individuals with knee osteoarthritis. Physiother Theory Pract. 2012;28(1):32–40; doi: 10.3109/09593985/2011.
 
41.
Hue O, Simoneau M, Marcotte J, Berrigan F, Doré J, Marceau P, et al. Body weight is a strong predictor of postural stability. Gait Posture. 2007;26(1):32–38; doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.07.005.
 
42.
Alonso AC, Luna NMS, Mochizuki L, Barbieri F, Santos S, D’Andréia Greve JM. The influence of anthropometric factors on postural balance: the relationship between body composition and posturographic measurements in young adults. Clinics. 2012;67(12):1433–1441; doi: 10.6061/clinics/2012(12)14.
 
43.
Greve J, Alonso A, Bordini ACPG, Camanho GL. Correlation between body mass index and postural balance.
 
44.
Clinics. 2007;62(6):717–720; doi: 10.1590/S1807-59322007000600010. Available from: http://www.
 
45.
scielo.br/pdf/clin/v62n6/08.pdf.
 
46.
Berrigan F, Simoneau M, Tremblay A, Hue O, Teasdale N. Influence of obesity on accurate and rapid arm.
 
47.
movement performed from a standing posture. Int J Obes.2006;30(12):1750–1757; doi: 10. 1038/sj.ijo.0803342.
 
48.
Friel K, McLean N, Myers C, Caceres M. Ipsilateral hip abductor weakness after inversion ankle sprain. J Athl.
 
49.
Train. 2006;41(1):74–78.
 
50.
Fabunmi AA, Gbiri CA. Relationship between balance performance in the elderly and some anthropometric variables. Afr J Med Med Sci. 2008;37(4):321–326.
 
51.
Han J, Anson J, Waddington G, Adams R, Liu Y. The role of ankle proprioception for balance control in relation to sports performance and injury. Biomed Res.
 
52.
Int. 2015;2015:842804; doi: 10.1155/2015/842804.
 
53.
Pallant J. SPSS survival manual: a step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS . Maidenhead: Open University Press; 2013.
 
eISSN:1899-1955
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top