REVIEW PAPER
Validity of local positioning systems to measure external load in sport settings: a brief review
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Institute of Sport Science and Innovations, Lithuanian Sports University, Kaunas, Lithuania
 
 
Submission date: 2019-11-19
 
 
Acceptance date: 2020-03-04
 
 
Publication date: 2020-07-14
 
 
Hum Mov. 2020;21(4):30-36
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
The aim of this study was to review the validity of the commonly adopted local positioning systems (LPSs) in sports settings for measuring athletes’ external load (i.e. distances, speeds, accelerations, and decelerations), with a special focus on systems using radio-frequency identification (RFID) and ultra-wideband (UWB) technology. The reviewed articles showed that the validity of 6 LPSs including both RFID and UWB technologies was assessed by documenting acceptable validity for measuring distances (< 3.5% difference) when compared with reference systems across different activities and sports (indoor and outdoor). Inconsistent results have been presented for average speeds, with difference from reference systems of up to 35%. Additionally, high differences have been revealed for accelerations (up to 12%) and decelerations (up to 84%) during movements including changes of directions and for high-intensity speeds (up to 43% difference) during small-sided games. Finally, the reviewed studies suggest a higher validity in measuring instant speeds and accelerations in LPSs compared with other tracking systems (global positioning systems and video-based systems). In conclusion, this review paper implies acceptable validity of the investigated LPSs in measuring distances, while caution should be observed when measuring speeds, accelerations, and decelerations. Moreover, this review provides sports coaches, practitioners, and club directors with valuable information on purchasing and using LPSs in sports settings.
REFERENCES (26)
1.
Impellizzeri FM, Marcora SM, Coutts AJ. Internal and external training load: 15 years on. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2019;14(2):270–273; doi: 10.1123/ ijspp.2018-0935.
 
2.
Cummins C, Orr R, O’Connor H, West C. Global positioning systems (GPS) and microtechnology sensors in team sports: a systematic review. Sports Med. 2013; 43(10):1025–1042; doi: 10.1007/s40279-013-0069-2.
 
3.
Malone JJ, Lovell R, Varley MC, Coutts AJ. Unpacking the black box: applications and considerations for using GPS devices in sport. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2017;12(Suppl. 2):S218–S226; doi: 10.1123/ ijspp.2016-0236.
 
4.
Cardinale M, Varley MC. Wearable training-monitoring technology: applications, challenges, and opportunities. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2017;12(Suppl. 2):S255–S262; doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2016-0423.
 
5.
Boyd LJ, Ball K, Aughey RJ. The reliability of minimaxX accelerometers for measuring physical activity in Australian football. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2011;6(3):311–321; doi: 10.1123/ijspp.6.3.311.
 
6.
Kniubaite A, Skarbalius A, Clemente FM, Conte D. Quantification of external and internal match loads in elite female team handball. Biol Sport. 2019;36(4):311– 316; doi: 10.5114/BIOLSPORT.2019.88753.
 
7.
Sansone P, Tessitore A, Paulauskas H, Lukonaitiene I, Tschan H, Pliauga V, et al. Physical and physiological demands and hormonal responses in basketball smallsided games with different tactical tasks and training regimes. J Sci Med Sport. 2019;22(5):602–606; doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2018.11.017.
 
8.
Schelling X, Torres L. Accelerometer load profiles for basketball-specific drills in elite players. J Sports Sci Med. 2016;15(4):585–591.
 
9.
Fox JL, Scanlan AT, Stanton R. A review of player monitoring approaches in basketball: current trends and future directions. J Strength Cond Res. 2017;31(7): 2021–2029; doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001964.
 
10.
Nicolella DP, Torres-Ronda L, Saylor KJ, Schelling X. Validity and reliability of an accelerometer-based player tracking device. PLoS One. 2018;13(2):e0191823; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191823.
 
11.
Alarifi A, Al-Salman A, Alsaleh M, Alnafessah A, AlHadhrami S, Al-Ammar MA, et al. Ultra wideband indoor positioning technologies: analysis and recent advances. Sensors. 2016;16(5):707; doi: 10.3390/s16050707.
 
12.
Sampaio J, McGarry T, Calleja-González J, Sáiz SJ, Schelling i del Alcázar X, Balciunas X. Exploring game performance in the National Basketball Association using player tracking data. PLoS One. 2015;10(7): 132894; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132894.
 
13.
Serpiello FR, Hopkins WG, Barnes S, Tavrou J, Duthie GM, Aughey RJ, et al. Validity of an ultra-wideband local positioning system to measure locomotion in indoor sports. J Sports Sci. 2018;36(15):1727–1733; doi: 10.1080/02640414.2017.1411867.
 
14.
Luteberget LS, Spencer M, Gilgien M. Validity of the Catapult ClearSky T6 local positioning system for team sports specific drills, in indoor conditions. Front Physiol. 2018;9:115; doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00115.
 
15.
Currell K, Jeukendrup AE. Validity, reliability and sensitivity of measures of sporting performance. Sports Med. 2008;38(4):297–316; doi: 10.2165/00007256- 200838040-00003.
 
16.
Ranstam J. Methodological note: accuracy, precision, and validity. Acta Radiol. 2008;49(1):105–106; doi: 10.1080/02841850701772706.
 
17.
Frencken WGP, Lemmink KAPM, Delleman NJ. Soccer-specific accuracy and validity of the local position measurement (LPM) system. J Sci Med Sport. 2010; 13(6):641–645; doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2010.04.003.
 
18.
Sathyan T, Shuttleworth R, Hedley M, Davids K. Validity and reliability of a radio positioning system for tracking athletes in indoor and outdoor team sports. Behav Res Methods. 2012;44(4):1108–1114; doi: 10.3758/s13428-012-0192-2.
 
19.
Ogris G, Leser R, Horsak B, Kornfeind P, Heller M, Baca A. Accuracy of the LPM tracking system considering dynamic position changes. J Sports Sci. 2012;30(14): 1503–1511; doi: 10.1080/02640414.2012.712712.
 
20.
Leser R, Schleindlhuber A, Lyons K, Baca A. Accuracy of an UWB-based position tracking system used for time-motion analyses in game sports. Eur J Sport Sci. 2014;14(7):635–642; doi: 10.1080/17461391.2014. 884167.
 
21.
Rhodes J, Mason B, Perrat B, Smith M, Goosey-Tolfrey V. The validity and reliability of a novel indoor player tracking system for use within wheelchair court sports. J Sports Sci. 2014;32(17):1639–1647; doi: 10.1080/ 02640414.2014.910608.
 
22.
Bastida-Castillo A, Gómez-Carmona CD, De la CruzSánchez E, Reche-Royo X, Ibáñez SJ, Pino Ortega J. Accuracy and inter-unit reliability of ultra-wide-band tracking system in indoor exercise. Appl Sci. 2019;9:939; doi: 10.3390/app9050939.
 
23.
Linke D, Link D, Lames M. Validation of electronic performance and tracking systems EPTS under field conditions. PLoS One. 2018;13(7):e0199519; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199519.
 
24.
Bastida Castillo A, Gómez Carmona CD, De la Cruz Sánchez E, Pino Ortega J. Accuracy, intra- and inter-unit reliability, and comparison between GPS and UWBbased position-tracking systems used for time-motion analyses in soccer. Eur J Sport Sci. 2018;18(4):450–457; doi: 10.1080/17461391.2018.1427796.
 
25.
Hoppe MW, Baumgart C, Polglaze T, Freiwald J. Validity and reliability of GPS and LPS for measuring distances covered and sprint mechanical properties in team sports. PLoS One. 2018;13(2):e0192708; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192708.
 
26.
Figueira B, Gonçalves B, Folgado H, Masiulis N, Calleja-González J, Sampaio J. Accuracy of a basketball indoor tracking system based on standard Bluetooth low energy channels (NBN23®). Sensors. 2018;18(6): 1940; doi: 10.3390/s18061940.
 
eISSN:1899-1955
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top