ORIGINAL PAPER
Testing variations of methodological characteristics on the 5-0-5 test: impact of the linear sprint on change-of-direction deficit of adult male soccer players
Hadi Nobari
6,7,8
1
Escola Superior de Desporto e Lazer, Instituto Politecnico de Viana do Castelo, Viana do Castelo, Portugal
2
Research Center in Sports Performance, Recreation, Innovation and Technology, Melgaco, Portugal
3
Instituto de Telecomunicacoes, Delegacao da Covilha, Covilha, Portugal
4
School of Behavioural and Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Brisbane, Australia
5
Department of Physical Education and Sports, Faculty of Education and Sport Sciences, University of Granada, Melilla, Spain
6
Department of Exercise Physiology, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran
7
Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Extremadura, Caceres, Spain
8
Department of Motor Performance, Faculty of Physical Education and Mountain Sports, Transilvania University of Braşov, Braşov, Romania
Submission date: 2022-11-23
Acceptance date: 2022-11-28
Publication date: 2023-05-23
Hum Mov. 2023;24(2):127-135
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Purpose:
The study compared the change-of-direction deficit (CODD) using the first 10-m sprint of a 40-m sprint test (CODDoriginal), the 10-m time that precedes the 5-0-5 test (CODD5-0-5start), and the best 10-m split of a 40-m sprint test (CODDbest).
Methods:
A cross-sectional study design was applied. Twenty elite male soccer players (age: 21.6 ± 2.0 years; experience: 8.7 ± 2.3 years; body mass: 73.2 ± 6.1 kg; stature: 174.8 ± 4.5 cm) voluntarily participated in this study. They were assessed in the following tests: (i) 40-m linear sprint test and (ii) 5-0-5 test with a pre-planned 180° change-of-direction (COD) (left and right sides). CODD for both sides was calculated as the difference between average 5-0-5 and CODDoriginal, COODbest, and CODD5-0-5start.
Results:
The time over 10 m during the 30–40-m split of a 40-m sprint test was significantly shorter than the first 10 m of the same sprint test (best times: p < 0.001, d = –7.077; average time: p < 0.001, d = –1.140) and the first 10-m acceleration phase of the 5-0-5 test (best times: p < 0.001, d = 9.000; average times: p < 0.001, d = –8.500). No significant differences were found between the first 10 m of the 40-m sprint test and the 5-0-5 test (best times: p > 0.999, d = 0.133; average times: p = 0.990, d = 0.047). Comparisons of CODD revealed significant differences between approaches (best times: F = 201.7, p < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.914; average times: F = 196.2, p < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.912). However, there were no significant correlations between any CODD outcomes and the 40-m sprint test (p > 0.05).
Conclusions:
CODD calculated with the first 10 m and the best 10 m of a sprint test was significantly different; similarities existed between the initial 10 m of a 40-m sprint test and the 5-0-5 test. Therefore, to save time and resources, practitioners could use the first 10-m acceleration phase of the 5-0-5 since no significant differences were found between the initial 10 m of a linear sprint test.
The study compared the change-of-direction deficit (CODD) using the first 10-m sprint of a 40-m sprint test (CODDoriginal), the 10-m time that precedes the 5-0-5 test (CODD5-0-5start), and the best 10-m split of a 40-m sprint test (CODDbest).
Methods:
A cross-sectional study design was applied. Twenty elite male soccer players (age: 21.6 ± 2.0 years; experience: 8.7 ± 2.3 years; body mass: 73.2 ± 6.1 kg; stature: 174.8 ± 4.5 cm) voluntarily participated in this study. They were assessed in the following tests: (i) 40-m linear sprint test and (ii) 5-0-5 test with a pre-planned 180° change-of-direction (COD) (left and right sides). CODD for both sides was calculated as the difference between average 5-0-5 and CODDoriginal, COODbest, and CODD5-0-5start.
Results:
The time over 10 m during the 30–40-m split of a 40-m sprint test was significantly shorter than the first 10 m of the same sprint test (best times: p < 0.001, d = –7.077; average time: p < 0.001, d = –1.140) and the first 10-m acceleration phase of the 5-0-5 test (best times: p < 0.001, d = 9.000; average times: p < 0.001, d = –8.500). No significant differences were found between the first 10 m of the 40-m sprint test and the 5-0-5 test (best times: p > 0.999, d = 0.133; average times: p = 0.990, d = 0.047). Comparisons of CODD revealed significant differences between approaches (best times: F = 201.7, p < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.914; average times: F = 196.2, p < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.912). However, there were no significant correlations between any CODD outcomes and the 40-m sprint test (p > 0.05).
Conclusions:
CODD calculated with the first 10 m and the best 10 m of a sprint test was significantly different; similarities existed between the initial 10 m of a 40-m sprint test and the 5-0-5 test. Therefore, to save time and resources, practitioners could use the first 10-m acceleration phase of the 5-0-5 since no significant differences were found between the initial 10 m of a linear sprint test.
REFERENCES (22)
1.
Little T, Williams AG. Specificity of acceleration, maximum speed, and agility in professional soccer players. J Strength Cond Res. 2005;19(1):76–78; doi: 10.1519/ 14253.1.
2.
Hasan UC, Silva R, Clemente FM. Weekly variations of biomechanical load variables in professional soccer players: comparisons between playing positions. Hum Mov. 2021;22(3):19–34; doi: 10.5114/hm.2021.100321.
3.
Cruz Goncalves LG, Clemente FM, Palucci Vieira LH, Bedo B, Puggina EF, Moura F, et al. Effects of match location, quality of opposition, match outcome, and playing position on load parameters and players’ prominence during official matches in professional soccer players. Hum Mov. 2021;22(3):35–44; doi: 10.5114/ hm.2021.100322.
4.
Chaouachi A, Manzi V, Chaalali A, Wong DP, Chamari K, Castagna C. Determinants analysis of change-of-direction ability in elite soccer players. J Strength Cond Res. 2012;26(10):2667–2676; doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318 242f97a.
5.
Loturco I, Nimphius S, Kobal R, Bottino A, Zanetti V, Pereira LA, et al. Change-of direction deficit in elite young soccer players. Ger J Exerc Sport Res. 2018;48(2):228– 234; doi: 10.1007/s12662-018-0502-7.
6.
Rauter S, Coh M, Vodicar J, Zvan M, Krizaj J, Simenko J, et al. Analysis of reactive agility and change-ofdirection speed between soccer players and physical education students. Hum Mov. 2018;19(2):68–74; doi: 10.5114/hm.2018.74061.
7.
Faude O, Koch T, Meyer T. Straight sprinting is the most frequent action in goal situations in professional foot ball. J Sports Sci. 2012;30(7):625–631; doi: 10.1080/ 02640414.2012.665940.
8.
Turner A, Walker S, Stembridge M, Coneyworth P, Reed G, Birdsey L, et al. A testing battery for the assessment of fitness in soccer players. Strength Cond J. 2011; 33(5):29–39; doi: 10.1519/SSC.0b013e31822fc80a.
9.
Križaj J. Relationship between agility, linear sprinting, and vertical jumping performance in Slovenian elite women football players. Hum Mov. 2020;21(2):78–84; doi: 10.5114/hm.2020.91281.
10.
Sayers MGL. Influence of test distance on change of direction speed test results. J Strength Cond Res. 2015; 29(9):2412–2416; doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001045.
11.
Nimphius S, Callaghan SJ, Spiteri T, Lockie RG. Change of direction deficit: a more isolated measure of change of direction performance than total 505 time. J Strength Cond Res. 2016;30(11):3024–3032; doi: 10.1519/JSC. 0000000000001421.
12.
Laurent CM, Green JM, Bishop PA, Sjokvist J, Schumacker RE, Richardson MT, et al. A practical approach to monitoring recovery: development of a perceived recovery status scale. J Strength Cond Res. 2011;25(3): 620–628; doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181c69ec6.
13.
Liu R, Liu J, Ma X, Li Q, An R. Effect of FIFA 11+ intervention on change of direction performance in soccer and futsal players: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Int J Sports Sci Coach. 2021;16(3):862–872; doi: 10.1177/1747954121991667.
14.
Bizzini M, Impellizzeri FM, Dvorak J, Bortolan L, Schena F, Modena R, et al. Physiological and performance responses to the “FIFA 11+” (part 1): is it an appropriate warm-up? J Sports Sci. 2013;31(13):1481–1490; doi: 10.1080/02640414.2013.802922.
15.
Sagiroglu İ, Akyildiz Z, Yildiz M, Clemente FM. Validity and reliability of Polar Team Pro GPS units for assessing maximum sprint speed in soccer players. Proc Inst Mech Eng P J Sports Eng Technol. 2021; doi: 10.1177/ 17543371211047224.
16.
Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
17.
Dos’Santos T, Thomas C, Jones PA, Comfort P. Assessing asymmetries in change of direction speed performance: application of change of direction deficit. J Strength Cond Res. 2019;33(11):2953–2961; doi: 10.1519/ JSC.0000000000002438.
18.
Dos’Santos T, Thomas C, Comfort P, Jones PA. Comparison of change of direction speed performance and asymmetries between team-sport athletes: application of change of direction deficit. Sports. 2018;6(4):174; doi: 10.3390/sports6040174.
19.
Yu J, Sun Y, Yang C, Wang D, Yin K, Herzog W, et al. Biomechanical insights into differences between the mid-acceleration and maximum velocity phases of sprinting. J Strength Cond Res. 2016;30(7):1906–1916; doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001278.
20.
Nimphius S, Geib G, Spiteri T, Carlisle D. “Change of direction deficit” measurement in Division I American football players. J Aust Strength Cond. 2013;21(S2): 115–117.
21.
Loturco I, Pereira LA, Freitas TT, Alcaraz PE, Zanetti V, Bishop C, et al. Maximum acceleration performance of professional soccer players in linear sprints: is there a direct connection with change-of-direction ability? PLoS One. 2019;14(5):e0216806; doi: 10.1371/journal. pone.0216806.
22.
Dos’Santos T, Thomas C, Jones PA, Comfort P. Asymmetries in isometric force-time characteristics are not detrimental to change of direction speed. J Strength Cond Res. 2018;32(2):520–527; doi: 10.1519/JSC.000 0000000002327.
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
| eISSN: | 1899-1955 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
