ORIGINAL PAPER
Inter-limb step asymmetry in closed and open skill sprint accelerations in soccer players
More details
Hide details
1
Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Coventry University, Coventry, United Kingdom
2
Cardiff School of Sport & Health Sciences, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff, United
Kingdom
Submission date: 2019-09-09
Acceptance date: 2020-02-11
Publication date: 2020-08-27
Hum Mov. 2021;22(1):1-8
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Purpose:
Inter-limb differences may decrease sports performance. There is a need to
understand the comparison of asymmetries between open and closed skill tasks. The study
investigated inter-limb step asymmetry responses to closed and open skill acceleration sprint
running tasks.
Methods:
3D motion analysis kinematic data of step characteristics were collected from 20
male soccer players (mean ± SD: 21 ± 1.9 years, 78.7 ± 7.7 kg, 1.78 ± 0.06 m) for bilaterally
located lower-limb markers during the initial 20 m of closed and open skill acceleration sprint
running trials. Step velocity, step length, step frequency, flight time, contact time, and flight
distance were calculated. In the closed skill conditions, players knew the final sprint distance
before initiation. In the open skill conditions, players were informed of the final sprint
distance (20 or 40 m) immediately after run initiation.
Results:
Significant asymmetries (0.10–10.3%, p < 0.05) in step characteristics were observed
during closed skill acceleration sprint performances. Positive correlations (r: 0.51–0.77, p <
0.05) were evidenced between asymmetry scores in the closed skill and in the open skill 20-m
and 40-m conditions. Asymmetry scores were not associated with sprint performance (r: from
–0.13 to 0.30, p > 0.05), suggesting that asymmetry may be functional or dysfunctional.
Conclusions:
Skilled soccer players can regulate step characteristic asymmetries across
closed and open skill tasks. Symmetry should not be assumed when assessing open and closed
skill acceleration sprint performance in soccer players. Practitioners should be aware of these
asymmetries when implementing programmes.
REFERENCES (28)
1.
Keeley DW, Plummer HA, Oliver GD. Predicting asymmetrical lower extremity strength deficits in collegeaged men and women using common horizontal and vertical power field tests: a possible screening mechanism. J Strength Cond Res. 2011;25(6):1632–1637; doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181ddf690.
2.
Bishop C, Turner A, Read P. Effects of inter-limb asymmetries on physical and sports performance: a systematic review. J Sports Sci. 2018;36(10):1135–1144; doi: 10.1080/02640414.2017.1361894.
3.
Barber SD, Noyes FR, Mangine RE, McCloskey JW, Hartman W. Quantitative assessment of functional limitations in normal and anterior cruciate ligamentdeficient knees. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;255:204–214; doi: 10.1097/00003086-199006000-00028.
4.
Grindem H, Logerstedt D, Eitzen I, Moksnes H, Axe MJ, Snyder-Mackler L, et al. Single-legged hop tests as predictors of self-reported knee function in nonoperatively treated individuals with anterior cruciate ligament injury. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(11):2347–2354; doi: 10.1177/0363546511417085.
5.
Impellizzeri FM, Rampinini E, Maffiuletti N, Marcora SM. A vertical jump force test for assessing bilateral strength asymmetry in athletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007;39(11):2044–2050; doi: 10.1249/mss.0b013e31814fb55c.
6.
Kyritsis P, Bahr R, Landreau P, Miladi R, Witvrouw E. Likelihood of ACL graft rupture: not meeting six clinical discharge criteria before return to sport is associated with a four times greater risk of rupture. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50(15):946–951; doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2015.
8.
Hamill J, Bates BT, Knutzen KM. Ground reaction force symmetry during walking and running. Res Q Exercise Sport. 1984;55(3):289–293; doi: 10.1080/02701367.1984.10609367.
9.
Vagenas G, Hoshizaki B. Functional asymmetries and lateral dominance in the lower limbs of distance runners. Int J Sport Biomech. 1991;7(4):311–329; doi: 10.1123/ijsb.7.4.311.
10.
Zifchock RA, Davis I, Hamill J. Kinetic asymmetry in female runners with and without retrospective tibial stress fractures. J Biomech. 2006;39(15):2792–2797; doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.10.003.
11.
Laroche DP, Cook SB, Mackala K. Strength asymmetry increases gait asymmetry and variability in older women. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012;44(11):2172–2181; doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31825e1d31.
12.
Lockie RG, Murphy AJ, Schultz AB, Jefferiess MD, Callaghan SJ. Influence of sprint acceleration stance kinetics on velocity and step kinematics in field sport athletes. J Strength Cond Res. 2013;27(9):2494–2503; doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31827f5103.
13.
Moir G, Sanders R, Button C, Glaister M. The effect of periodized resistance training on accelerative sprint performance. Sports Biomech. 2007;6(3):285–300; doi: 10.1080/14763140701489793.
14.
Di Salvo V, Baron R, González-Haro C, Gormasz C, Pigozzi F, Bachl N. Sprinting analysis of elite soccer players during European Champions League and UEFA Cup matches. J Sports Sci. 2010;28(14):1489–1494; doi: 10.1080/02640414.2010.521166.
15.
Di Salvo V, Gregson W, Atkinson G, Tordoff P, Drust B. Analysis of high intensity activity in Premier League soccer. Int J Sports Med. 2009;30(3):205–212; doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1105950.
16.
Hunter JP, Marshall RN, McNair PJ. Interaction of step length and step rate during sprint running. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36(2):261–271; doi: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000113664.15777.53.
17.
Meyers RW, Oliver JL, Hughes MG, Lloyd RS, Cronin JB. Asymmetry during maximal sprint performance in 11- to 16-year-old boys. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2017;29(1):94–102; doi: 10.1123/pes.2016-0018.
18.
Exell T, Irwin G, Gittoes M, Kerwin D. Strength and performance asymmetry during maximal velocity sprint running. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2017;27(11):1273–1282; doi: 10.1111/sms.12759.
19.
Sanders R, Li S, Hamill J. Adjustment to change in familiar and unfamiliar task constraints. J Sports Sci. 2009;27(6):651–659; doi: 10.1080/02640410902729758.
20.
Sheppard JM, Young WB. Agility literature review: classifications, training and testing. J Sports Sci. 2006;24(9):919–932; doi: 10.1080/02640410500457109.
21.
Araújo D, Davids K, Bennett SJ, Button C, Chapman G. Emergence of sport skills under constraints. In: Williams AM, Hodges NJ (eds.), Skill acquisition in sport: research, theory and practice. London: Routledge; 2004;409–433.
22.
Bezodis I, Thomson A, Gittoes M, Kerwin D. Identification of instants of touchdown and take-off in sprint running using an automatic motion analysis system. In: Menzel HJ, Chagas MH (eds.), Proceedings of the 25th International Symposium on Biomechanics in Sports. Ouro Preto: International Society of Biomechanics in Sports; 2007; 501–504.
23.
Salo AIT, Bezodis IN, Batterham AM, Kerwin DG. Elite sprinting: are athletes individually step-frequency or step-length reliant? Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43(6):1055–1062; doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e318201f6f8.
24.
Zifchock RA, Davis I, Higginson J, Royer T. The symmetry angle: a novel, robust method of quantifying asymmetry. Gait Posture. 2008;27(4):622–627; doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.08.006.
25.
Zuzgina O, Wdowski MM. Asymmetry of dominant and non-dominant shoulders in university level men and women volleyball players. Hum Mov. 2019;20(4):19–27; doi: 10.5114/hm.2019.85095.
26.
Kugler PN, Turvey MT. Self-organization, flow fields, and information. Hum Mov Sci. 1988;7(2–4):97–129; doi: 10.1016/0167-9457(88)90009-7.
27.
Sheppard JM, Young WB, Doyle TLA, Sheppard TA, Newton RU. An evaluation of a new test of reactive agility and its relationship to sprint speed and change of direction speed. J Sci Med Sport. 2006;9(4):342–349; doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2006.05.019.
28.
Bellon CR, DeWeese BH, Sato K, Clark KP, Stone MH. Defining the early, mid, and late subsections of sprint acceleration in Division I men’s soccer players. J Strength Cond Res. 2019;33(4):1001–1006; doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003088.