REVIEW PAPER
Evaluating the impact of visual training on athletic performance: a systematic review of key interventions (2012–2022)
1
College of Sports Science and Technology, Mahidol University, Nakhonpathom, Thailand
2
Faculty of Optometry, Rangsit University, Pathum Thani, Thailand
3
Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Mahidol University, Nakhonpathom, Thailand
These authors had equal contribution to this work
Submission date: 2025-03-07
Acceptance date: 2025-05-19
Online publication date: 2025-09-09
Corresponding author
Amornpan Ajjimaporn
College of Sports Science and Technology, Mahidol University Salaya, Nakhonpathom, Thailand,
College of Sports Science and Technology, Mahidol University Salaya, Nakhonpathom, Thailand,
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Purpose:
Visual skills are fundamental for athletic performance, yet studies present mixed evidence regarding the efficacy of visual training, with variations in methodologies and sport-specific applicability contributing to the ongoing debate. This systematic review evaluated various visual training interventions on athletes’ performance from 2012 to 2022.
Methods:
A systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta- Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A comprehensive search across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane (2012–2022) using terms such as ‘visual training’, ‘sports vision’, and ‘cognitive-motor training’ identified 24 eligible randomised controlled trials based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Results:
Fourteen distinct visual training programs were analysed, with Quiet Eye Training, Stroboscopic Training, and 3D-MOT Training being the most frequently investigated. Quiet Eye Training improved accuracy, gaze control, and stress regulation. Stroboscopic Training enhanced visuomotor coordination, although its effects on visual perception varied. 3D-MOT Training improved the ability to track multiple moving objects, particularly benefiting dynamic sports such as soccer. However, not all programs yielded significant performance gains, emphasising the importance of sport-specific training approaches.
Conclusions:
A key limitation was the variation in study designs and outcomes, which hindered direct comparisons. This review highlights the potential of visual training to improve athletic performance and underscores the need for future research with standardised protocols, larger sample sizes, and stronger emphasis on sport-specific applications and individual differences among athletes.
Visual skills are fundamental for athletic performance, yet studies present mixed evidence regarding the efficacy of visual training, with variations in methodologies and sport-specific applicability contributing to the ongoing debate. This systematic review evaluated various visual training interventions on athletes’ performance from 2012 to 2022.
Methods:
A systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta- Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A comprehensive search across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane (2012–2022) using terms such as ‘visual training’, ‘sports vision’, and ‘cognitive-motor training’ identified 24 eligible randomised controlled trials based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Results:
Fourteen distinct visual training programs were analysed, with Quiet Eye Training, Stroboscopic Training, and 3D-MOT Training being the most frequently investigated. Quiet Eye Training improved accuracy, gaze control, and stress regulation. Stroboscopic Training enhanced visuomotor coordination, although its effects on visual perception varied. 3D-MOT Training improved the ability to track multiple moving objects, particularly benefiting dynamic sports such as soccer. However, not all programs yielded significant performance gains, emphasising the importance of sport-specific training approaches.
Conclusions:
A key limitation was the variation in study designs and outcomes, which hindered direct comparisons. This review highlights the potential of visual training to improve athletic performance and underscores the need for future research with standardised protocols, larger sample sizes, and stronger emphasis on sport-specific applications and individual differences among athletes.
REFERENCES (45)
1.
Prasad S, Galetta SL. Anatomy and physiology of the afferent visual system. Handbook of clinical neurology. 2011;102:3–19; doi: 10.1016/B978- 0-444-52903-9.00007-8.
2.
Muiños M, Ballesteros S. Does physical exercise improve perceptual skills and visuospatial attention in older adults? A review. Eur Rev Aging Phys Act. 2018;15(1):2; doi: 10.1186/s11556-018-0191-0.
3.
Müller S, Morris-Binelli K, Hambrick DZ, Macnamara BN. Accelerating visual anticipation in sport through temporal occlusion training: a metaanalysis. Sports Med. 2024;54(10):2597–606; doi: 10.1007/s40279-024-02073-6.
4.
Zhu R, Zheng M, Liu S, Guo J, Cao C. Effects of perceptual-cognitive training on anticipation and decision-making skills in team sports: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Behav Sci. 2024; 14(10):919; doi: 10.3390/bs14100919.
5.
Faure C, Limballe A, Bideau B, Kulpa R. Virtual reality to assess and train team ball sports performance: a scoping review. J Sports Sci. 2020;38(2): 192–205; doi: 10.1080/02640414.2019.1689807.
6.
Das J, Walker R, Barry G, Vitório R, Stuart S, Morris R. Stroboscopic visual training: The potential for clinical application in neurological populations. PLOS Digit Health. 2023;2(8):e0000335; doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000335.
7.
Vine SJ, Moore LJ, Wilson MR. Quiet eye training facilitates competitive putting performance in elite golfers. Front Psychol. 2011;2:8; doi: 10.3389/ fpsyg.2011.00008.
8.
Laby DM, Appelbaum LG. Review: vision and onfield performance: a critical review of visual assessment and training studies with athletes. Optom Vis Sci. 2021;98(7):723–31; doi: 10.1097/ OPX.0000000000001729.
9.
Appelbaum LG, Erickson G. Sports vision training: a review of the state-of-the-art in digital training techniques. Int Rev Sport Exerc Psychol. 2018; 11(1):160–89; doi: 10.1080/1750984X.2016.126 6376.
10.
Buscemi A, Mondelli F, Biagini I, Gueli S, D’Agostino A, Coco M. Role of sport vision in performance: systematic review. J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2024;9(2); doi: 10.3390/jfmk9020092.
11.
Lebeau JC, Liu S, Sáenz-Moncaleano C, Sanduvete- Chaves S, Chacón-Moscoso S, Becker BJ, Tenenbaum G. Quiet eye and performance in sport: a meta-analysis. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2016;38(5): 441–57; doi: 10.3390/jfmk9020092.
12.
Heildenberg C. Dimarucot JPMA. Optimizing Gaze Control and Quiet Eye Techniques: a comprehensive review of training methodologies in elite sports performance. Int J Hum Mov Sports Sci. 2024;12(5):864–71; doi: 10.13189/saj.2024. 120512.
13.
Hadlow SM, Panchuk D, Mann DL, Portus MR, Abernethy B. Modified perceptual training in sport: a new classification framework. J Sci Med Sport. 2018;21(9):950–8; doi: 10.1016/j.jsams. 2018.01.011.
14.
Wilkins L, Appelbaum LG. An early review of stroboscopic visual training: insights, challenges and accomplishments to guide future studies. Int Rev Sport Exerc Psychol. 2020;13(1):65–80; doi: 10.1080/1750984X.2019.1582081.
15.
Fadde P, Zaichkowsky L. Training perceptualcognitive skills in sports using technology. J Sport Psychol Action. 2019;9(4):293–48; doi: 10.1080/ 21520704.2018.1509162.
16.
Broadbent DP, Causer J, Williams AM, Ford PR. Perceptual-cognitive skill training and its transfer to expert performance in the field: future research directions. Eur J Sport Sci. 2015;15(4):322–31; doi: 10.1080/17461391.2014.957727.
17.
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, Shamseer L, Tetzlaff JM, Akl EA, Brennan SE, Chou R, Glanville J, Grimshaw JM, Hróbjartsson A, Lalu MM, Li T, Loder EW, Mayo-Wilson E, McDonald S, McGuinness LA, Stewart LA, Thomas J, Tricco AC, Welch VA, Whiting P, Moher D. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71; doi: 10.1136/ bmj.n71.
18.
Navalta JW, Stone WJ, Lyons TS. Ethical issues relating to scientific discovery in exercise science. Int J Exerc Sci. 2019;12(1):1.
19.
Chang AA, Ellie K, Vahe E, Davies MS. The Effectiveness of virtual reality training: a systematic review. J Organ Behav Manag. 2024;44(3):214– 32; doi: 10.1080/01608061.2023.2240767.
20.
Smart NA, Waldron M, Ismail H, Giallauria F, Vigorito C, Cornelissen V, Dieberg G. Validation of a new tool for the assessment of study quality and reporting in exercise training studies: TESTEX. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015;13(1):9–18; doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000020.
21.
Eldridge S, Campbell M, Campbell M, Dahota A, Giraudeau B, Higgins J, Reeves B, Siegfried N. Revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2.0): additional considerations for cluster- randomized trials. 2016. Available from: https:// methods.cochrane.org/bias/resources/rob-2-revised- cochrane-risk-bias-tool-randomized-trials (accessed 13.04.2025).
22.
Moore LJ, Vine SJ, Cooke A, Ring C, Wilson MR. Quiet eye training expedites motor learning and aids performance under heightened anxiety: the roles of response programming and external attention. Psychophysiol. 2012;49(7):1005–15; doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2012.01379.x.
23.
Moore LJ, Vine SJ, Freeman P, Wilson MR. Quiet eye training promotes challenge appraisals and aids performance under elevated anxiety. Int J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2013;11(2):169–83; doi: 10.1080/1612197X.2013.773688.
24.
Moeinirad S, Abdoli B, Farsi A, Ahmadi N. Training visual attention improves basketball threepoint shot performance under pressure. Sport Sci Health. 2022;18(3):853–61; doi: 10.1007/s11332- 021-00866-0.
25.
Wood G, Wilson MR. Quiet-eye training, perceived control and performing under pressure. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2012;13(6):721–8; doi: 10.10 16/j.psychsport.2012. 05.003.
26.
Wilkins L, Gray R. Effects of stroboscopic visual training on visual attention, motion perception, and catching performance. Percept Mot Skills. 2015;121(1):57–79; doi: 10.2466/22.25.PMS.121 c11x0.
27.
Ellison P, Jones C, Sparks SA, Murphy PN, Page RM, Carnegie E, Marchant DC. The effect of stroboscopic visual training on eye–hand coordination. Sport Sci Health. 2020;16:401–10; doi: 10.1007/s11332-019-00615-4.
28.
Hülsdünker T, Rentz C, Ruhnow D, Käsbauer H, Strüder HK, Mierau A. The effect of 4-week stroboscopic training on visual function and sportspecific visuomotor performance in top-level badminton players. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2019;14(3):343–50; doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2018-0302.
29.
Romeas T, Guldner A, Faubert J. 3D-Multiple Object tracking training task improves passing decision- making accuracy in soccer players. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2016;22:1–9; doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2018- 0302.
30.
Scharfen H-E, Memmert D. Cognitive training in elite soccer players: evidence of narrow, but not broad transfer to visual and executive function. Ger J Exerc Sport Res. 2021;51(2):135–45; doi: 10.1007/s12662-020-00699-y.
31.
Krzepota J, Zwierko T, Puchalska-Niedbał L, Markiewicz M, Florkiewicz B, Lubiński W. The efficiency of a visual skills training program on visual search performance. J Hum Kinet. 2015; 46(1):231–40; doi: 10.1515/hukin-2015-0051.
32.
Jin Y, He J. Effects of visual search task on attentional bias and stress response under pressure. Work. 2021;69(2):687–96; doi: 10.3233/WOR- 213509.
33.
Zwierko T, Puchalska-Niedbał L, Krzepota J, Markiewicz M, Woźniak J, Lubiński W. The effects of sports vision training on binocular vision function in female university athletes. J Hum Kinet. 2015;49:287–96; doi: 10.1515/hukin-2015- 0131.
34.
Oudejans RR. Effects of visual control training on the shooting performance of elite female basketball players. Int J Sports Sci Coach. 2012;7(3): 469–80; doi: 10.1260/1747-9541.7.3.46.
35.
Brenton J, Müller S, Harbaugh AG. Visual-perceptual training with motor practice of the observed movement pattern improves anticipation in emerging expert cricket batsmen. J Sports Sci. 2019;37(18):2114–21; doi: 10.1080/02640414. 2019.1621510.
36.
Shekar SU, Erickson GB, Horn F, Hayes JR, Cooper S. Efficacy of a digital sports vision training program for improving visual abilities in collegiate baseball and softball athletes. Optom Vis Sci. 2021;98(7):815–25; doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000 00001740.
37.
Norouzi E, Hosseini FS, Vaezmosavi M, Gerber M, Pühse U, Brand S. Effect of quiet eye and quiet mind training on motor learning among novice dart players. Motor Control. 2019;24(2):204–21; doi: 10.1123/mc.2018-0116.
38.
Ryu D, Abernethy B, Park SH, Mann DL. The perception of deceptive information can be enhanced by training that removes superficial visual information. Front Psychol. 2018;9:1132; doi: 10.3389/ fpsyg.2018.01132.
39.
Klostermann A, Vater C, Kredel R, Hossner EJ. Perceptual training in beach volleyball defence: different effects of gaze-path cueing on gaze and decision-making. Front Psychol. 2015;6:1834; doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01834.
40.
Golovin M, Balioz N, Aizman R, Krivoshchekov S. Effect of audiovisual stimulation on the psychophysiological functions in track-and-field athletes. Hum Physiol. 2015;41:532–8; doi: 10.1134/S036 2119715050047.
41.
Larkin P, Mesagno C, Berry J, Spittle M, Harvey J. Video-based training to improve perceptual-cognitive decision-making performance of Australian football umpires. J Sports Sci. 2018;36(3):239– 46; doi: 10.1080/02640414.2017.1298827.
42.
Liu Y-H, See L-C, Chen S-C, Chang S-T, Lee J-S, Shieh L-C, Lim AY, Chen W-M. Effectiveness of visuomotor program via light signal on simple and choice static eye-hand response time among collegiate karate kumite athletes: pretest-posttest design with a control group. Arch Budo. 2019;15: 293–301.
43.
Minoonejad H, Barati AH, Naderifar H, Heidari B, Kazemi AS, Lashay A. Effect of four weeks of ocular- motor exercises on dynamic visual acuity and stability limit of female basketball players. Gait posture. 2019;73:286–90; doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost. 2019.06.022.
44.
Afshar A, Baqerli J, Taheri M. The effect of visual training on the rate of performance accuracy in girl soccer players. Int Arch Health Sci. 2019;6(2): 108–13; doi: 10.4103/iahs.iahs_5_19.
45.
Liu S, Ferris LM, Hilbig S, Asamoa E, LaRue JL, Lyon D, Connolly K, Port N, Appelbaum LG. Dynamic vision training transfers positively to batting practice performance among collegiate baseball batters. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2020;51:101759; doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport. 2020.101759.
| eISSN: | 1899-1955 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
