ORIGINAL PAPER
Biomechanical changes in women with chronic pelvic pain: a case-control study
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Physical Therapy for Women’s Health, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Misr University for Science and Technology, Giza, Egypt
 
2
Department of Biomechanics, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
 
3
Om El-Masryeen Hospital, Cairo, Egypt
 
4
Department of Physical Therapy for Women’s Health, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
 
5
Physiotherapy Department, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates
 
6
Department of Physical Therapy for Musculoskeletal Disorders and Its Surgery, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University, Egypt
 
7
Department of Basic Science, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
 
 
Submission date: 2020-02-07
 
 
Acceptance date: 2020-10-04
 
 
Publication date: 2021-07-25
 
 
Hum Mov. 2022;23(1):37-43
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Purpose:
Chronic pelvic pain can influence women’s quality of life and activity levels; it can lead to several adverse side effects, such as changes in posture and biomechanical alignment. The purpose of this study was to determine the biomechanical changes that occur in women experiencing chronic pelvic pain, either cyclic or noncyclic.

Methods:
A case-control study was conducted among 60 females from the Gynecology Physiotherapy Clinic of El-Hosary Women Health Care in 6th of October city. The participants were assigned into 3 groups: cyclic chronic pelvic pain group (A), noncyclic chronic pelvic pain group (B), and normal women group (C). An inclinometer was used to assess biomechanical changes in the angles of the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar region; furthermore, a pelvic inclinometer served to measure the pelvic inclination angle.

Results:
Statistical analysis revealed that there was a significant increase in biomechanical variables at the lumbar, thoracic, and cervical angles in group B compared with groups A and C and in group A compared with group C. Moreover, there was a significant increase in right and left pelvic inclination angles in groups A and B compared with group C, and no significant difference was observed between groups A and B.

Conclusions:
Biomechanical alignment changes are seen more frequently in women with noncyclic chronic pelvic pain and cyclic chronic pelvic pain than in normal women.

REFERENCES (22)
1.
Daniels JP, Khan KS. Chronic pelvic pain in women. BMJ. 2010;341:c4834; doi: 10.1136/bmj.c4834.
 
2.
Bonnema R, McNamara M, Harsh J, Hopkins E. Primary care management of chronic pelvic pain in women. Cleve Clin J Med. 2018;85(3):215–223; doi: 10.3949/ccjm.85a.16038.
 
3.
Won HR, Abbott J. Optimal management of chronic cyclical pelvic pain: an evidence-based and pragmatic approach. Int J Womens Health. 2010;2:263–277; doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S7991.
 
4.
Witzeman KA, Kopfman JE. Obstetrics-gynecology resident attitudes and perceptions about chronic pelvic pain: a targeted needs assessment to aid curriculum development. J Grad Med Educ. 2014;6(1):39–43; doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-13-00053.1.
 
5.
Mieritz RM, Thorhauge K, Forman A, Mieritz HB, Hartvigsen J, Christensen HW. Musculoskeletal dysfunctions in patients with chronic pelvic pain: a preliminary descriptive survey. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2016;39(9):616–622; doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2016.09.003.
 
6.
Montenegro ML, Mateus-Vasconcelos EC, Rosa e Silva JC, Dos Reis FJC, Nogueira AA, Poli-Neto OB. Postural changes in women with chronic pelvic pain: a case control study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2009;10:82; doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-10-82.
 
7.
Kim M-J, Baek I-H, Goo B-O. The effect of lumbar-pelvic alignment and abdominal muscle thickness on primary dysmenorrhea. J Phys Ther Sci. 2016;28(10):2988–2990; doi: 10.1589/jpts.28.2988.
 
8.
Le Huec JC, Aunoble S, Philippe L, Nicolas P. Pelvic parameters: origin and significance. Eur Spine J. 2011;20(Suppl. 5):564–571; doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-1940-1.
 
9.
Herrington L. Assessment of the degree of pelvic tilt within a normal asymptomatic population. Man Ther. 2011;16(6):646–648; doi: 10.1016/j.math.2011.04.006.
 
10.
McFarland C, Wang-Price S, Richard S. Clinical measurements of cervical lordosis using flexirule and inclinometer methods in individuals with and without cervical spine dysfunction: a reliability and validity study. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2015;28(2):295–302; doi: 10.3233/bmr-140517.
 
11.
Kolber MJ, Pizzini M, Robinson A, Yanez D, Hanney WJ. The reliability and concurrent validity of measurements used to quantify lumbar spine mobility: an analysis of an iPhone® application and gravity based inclinometry. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2013;8(2):129–137.
 
12.
Macintyre NJ, Bennett L, Bonnyman AM, Stratford PW. Optimizing reliability of digital inclinometer and flexicurve ruler measures of spine curvatures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis of the spine: an illustration of the use of generalizability theory. ISRN Rheumatol. 2011;2011:571698; doi: 10.5402/2011/571698.
 
13.
Clarkson HM. Musculoskeletal assessment: joint motion and muscle testing. Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Health; 2013.
 
14.
Bruno AG, Anderson DE, D’Agostino J, Bouxsein ML. The effect of thoracic kyphosis and sagittal plane alignment on vertebral compressive loading. J Bone Miner Res. 2012;27(10):2144–2151; doi: 10.1002/jbmr.1658.
 
15.
Grover S, Srivastava A, Lee R, Tewari AK, Te AE. Role of inflammation in bladder function and interstitial cystitis. Ther Adv Urol. 2011;3(1):19–33; doi: 10.1177/1756287211398255.
 
16.
Durham JD, Machan L. Pelvic congestion syndrome. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2013;30(4):372–380; doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1359731.
 
17.
Lee HS, Chung HK, Park SW. Correlation between trunk posture and neck reposition sense among subjects with forward head neck postures. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:689610; doi: 10.1155/2015/689610.
 
18.
Willard FH, Vleeming A, Schuenke MD, Danneels L, Schleip R. The thoracolumbar fascia: anatomy, function and clinical considerations. J Anat. 2012;221(6):507–536; doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2012.01511.x.
 
19.
Origoni M, Leone Roberti Maggiore U, Salvatore S, Candiani M. Neurobiological mechanisms of pelvic pain. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:903848; doi: 10.1155/2014/903848.
 
20.
Sedighimehr N, Manshadi FD, Shokouhi N, Baghban AA. Pelvic musculoskeletal dysfunctions in women with and without chronic pelvic pain. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2018;22(1):92–96; doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2017.05.001.
 
21.
Brawn J, Morotti M, Zondervan KT, Becker CM, Vincent K. Central changes associated with chronic pelvic pain and endometriosis. Hum Reprod Update. 2014;20(5):737–747; doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmu025.
 
22.
Vincent K, Warnaby C, Stagg CJ, Moore J, Kennedy S, Tracey I. Dysmenorrhoea is associated with central changes in otherwise healthy women. Pain. 2011;152(9):1966–1975; doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2011.03.029.
 
eISSN:1899-1955
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top