ORIGINAL PAPER
Adjustment of step frequency in obstacle avoidance during running
1
Department of Physical Education, Tokyo Women’s College of Physical Education, Tokyo, Japan
Submission date: 2025-04-02
Acceptance date: 2025-06-19
Publication date: 2025-12-22
Corresponding author
Yuya Maruo
Department of Physical Education, Tokyo Women’s College of Physical Education, 4-30-1, Fujimidai, Kunitachi, Tokyo, Japan, 186-8668
Department of Physical Education, Tokyo Women’s College of Physical Education, 4-30-1, Fujimidai, Kunitachi, Tokyo, Japan, 186-8668
Hum Mov. 2025;26(4):55-63
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Purpose:
This study aimed to investigate the variations in step rate for obstacle avoidance during running. While numerous studies have investigated obstacle avoidance during walking, our understanding of obstacle avoidance during running is still relatively limited. For this purpose, videos of the 3000-metre steeplechase were observed.
Methods:
Data were collected from the men’s 3000 m steeplechase races. Performances from 75 male athletes were analysed. The 3000 m steeplechase race consisted of seven laps. Analysis focused on the 10 steps immediately preceding obstacle clearance. All steps from the participants were digitalised using Kinovea (version 0.9.5). The step rate of ten steps before the hurdle were subjected to two-way ANOVAs with repeated factors of lap (lap1/lap2/lap3/lap4/lap5/lap6/lap7) and step (step1/step2/step3/step4/step5/step6/step7/step8/step9/takeoff). All statistical analyses were conducted using JASP (0.19.3), with a significance level of p < 0.05.
Results:
There was a significant interaction between lap and step [F(54,3996) = 1.97, p = 0.01, η2 p = 0.03]. In terms of step, the step rate increased from five steps before the takeoff (p < 0.05). Consistent with findings on obstacle avoidance during walking, our results demonstrated that runners initiate preparatory adjustments to their step rate roughly five steps prior to encountering an obstacle. In addition, the step rate just prior to obstacle avoidance is highly influenced by fatigue. In terms of laps, a significant difference was observed in steps 7, 8, 9, and 10 (p < 0.05).
Conclusions:
Our results demonstrated that runners initiated preparatory adjustments to their step rate approximately five steps prior to obstacle avoidance. Training for the 3000 m steeplechase should not only focus on enhancing endurancerelated physiological capacities but also on developing hurdle technique, particularly the preparatory phase in the five steps leading up to the hurdle.
This study aimed to investigate the variations in step rate for obstacle avoidance during running. While numerous studies have investigated obstacle avoidance during walking, our understanding of obstacle avoidance during running is still relatively limited. For this purpose, videos of the 3000-metre steeplechase were observed.
Methods:
Data were collected from the men’s 3000 m steeplechase races. Performances from 75 male athletes were analysed. The 3000 m steeplechase race consisted of seven laps. Analysis focused on the 10 steps immediately preceding obstacle clearance. All steps from the participants were digitalised using Kinovea (version 0.9.5). The step rate of ten steps before the hurdle were subjected to two-way ANOVAs with repeated factors of lap (lap1/lap2/lap3/lap4/lap5/lap6/lap7) and step (step1/step2/step3/step4/step5/step6/step7/step8/step9/takeoff). All statistical analyses were conducted using JASP (0.19.3), with a significance level of p < 0.05.
Results:
There was a significant interaction between lap and step [F(54,3996) = 1.97, p = 0.01, η2 p = 0.03]. In terms of step, the step rate increased from five steps before the takeoff (p < 0.05). Consistent with findings on obstacle avoidance during walking, our results demonstrated that runners initiate preparatory adjustments to their step rate roughly five steps prior to encountering an obstacle. In addition, the step rate just prior to obstacle avoidance is highly influenced by fatigue. In terms of laps, a significant difference was observed in steps 7, 8, 9, and 10 (p < 0.05).
Conclusions:
Our results demonstrated that runners initiated preparatory adjustments to their step rate approximately five steps prior to obstacle avoidance. Training for the 3000 m steeplechase should not only focus on enhancing endurancerelated physiological capacities but also on developing hurdle technique, particularly the preparatory phase in the five steps leading up to the hurdle.
REFERENCES (25)
1.
Patla AE, Rietdyk S, Martin C, Prentice S. Locomotor patterns of the leading and the trailing limbs as solid and fragile obstacles are stepped over: some insights into the role of vision during locomotion. J Mot Behav. 1996;28(1):35–47; doi: 10.1080/00222895.1996.9941731.
2.
Patla AE, Prentice SD, Robinson C, Neufeld J. Visual control of locomotion: strategies for changing direction and for going over obstacles. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1991;17(3):603–34; doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.17.3.603.
3.
Patla AE, Greig M. Any way you look at it, successful obstacle negotiation needs visually guided online foot placement regulation during the approach phase. Neurosci Lett. 2006;397(1–2):110–4; doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2005.12.016.
4.
Patla A, Rietdyk S. Visual control of limb trajectory over obstacles during locomotion: effect of obstacle height and width. Gait Posture. 1993;1(1): 45–60; doi: 10.1016/0966-6362(93)90042-Y.
5.
Patla AE, Vickers JN. Where and when do we look as we approach and step over an obstacle in the travel path?. Neuroreport. 1997;8(17):3661–5; doi: 10.1097/00001756-199712010-00002.
6.
Mohagheghi AA, Moraes R, Patla AE. The effects of distant and on-line visual information on the control of approach phase and step over an obstacle during locomotion. Exp Brain Res. 2004;155(4): 459–68; doi: 10.1007/s00221-003-1751-7.
7.
Mauroy G, Schepens B, Willems P. The mechanics of running while approaching and jumping over an obstacle. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2013;113: 1043–57; doi: 10.1007/s00421-012-2519-1.
8.
Hofmann F, Dürr V. When running is easier than walking: effects of experience and gait on human obstacle traversal in virtual reality. Exp Brain Res. 2022;240(10):2701–14; doi: 10.1007/s00221-022- 06443-2.
9.
Earl S, Hunter I, Mack GW, Seeley M. The relationship between steeplechase hurdle economy, mechanics, and performance. J Sport Health Sci. 2015;4(4):353–6; doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2015.03.009.
10.
Hanley B, Bissas A, Merlino S. Better water jump clearances were differentiated by longer landing distances in the 2017 IAAF World Championship 3000 m steeplechase finals. J. Sports Sci. 2020;38(3):330–5; doi: 10.1080/02640414.2019. 1698091.
11.
Hanley B, Williams EL. Successful pacing profiles of olympic men and women 3,000 m steeplechasers. Front Sports Act Living. 2020;2:21; doi: 10.3389/fspor.2020.00021.
12.
Hunter I, Bushnell TD. Steeplechase barriers affect women less than men. J Sports Sci Med. 2006; 5(2):318–22.
13.
Hunter I, Lindsay BK, Andersen KR. Gender differences and biomechanics in the 3000m steeplechase water jump. J Sports Sci Med. 2008; 7(2):218–22.
14.
Kipp S, Taboga P, Kram R. Ground reaction forces during steeplechase hurdling and waterjumps. Sports Biomech. 2017;16(2):152–65; doi: 10.1080/ 14763141.2016.1212917.
15.
Maruo Y. Characteristics of water jump for better performance in collegiate male 3000 m steeplechase. PeerJ. 2023;11:e15918; doi: 10.7717/ peerj.15918.
16.
Maruo Y. The hurdling on home straight in the women 3000m steeplechase. Sci. J Sport Perform. 2024;3(1):64–71; doi: 10.55860/HNRW6783.
17.
Ozaki Y, Ueda T, Fukuda T, Inai T, Kido E, Narisako D. Regulation of stride length during the approach run in the 400m hurdles. J Hum Kinet. 2019;69:59–67; doi: 10.2478/hukin-2019-0019.
18.
Esculier J-F, Silvini T, Bouyer LJ, Roy J-S. Videobased assessment of foot strike pattern and step rate is valid and reliable in runners with patellofemoral pain. Phys Ther Sport. 2018;29:108–12; doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2016.11.003.
19.
Luedke LE, Heiderscheit BC, Williams D, Rauh MJ. Influence of step rate on shin injury and anterior knee pain in high school runners. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016;48(7):1244–50; doi: 10.1249/ MSS.0000000000000890.
20.
Weart AN, Szymanek EB, Miller EM, Goss DL. The stability of step rate throughout a 3200 meter run. Gait Posture. 2019;71:284–8; doi: 10.1016/ j.gaitpost.2019.05.012.
21.
JASP Team. JASP (Version 0.19.3) [Computer software]. 2024; Available from: https://jasp-stats. org/ (accessed 20.12.204).
22.
Cohen, J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Routledge; 2013.
23.
Hunter I, Smith GA. Preferred and optimal stride frequency, stiffness and economy: changes with fatigue during a 1-h high-intensity run. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2007;100(6):653–61; doi: 10.1007/s004 21-007-0456-1.
24.
Jewell C, Boyer KA, Hamill J. Do footfall patterns in forefoot runners change over an exhaustive run?. J Sports Sci. 2017;35(1):74–80; doi: 10.1080/ 02640414.2016.1156726.
25.
Gabrielli E, Fulle S, Fanò-Illic G, Pietrangelo T. Analysis of training load and competition during the phd course of a 3000-m steeplechase female master athlete: an autobiography. Eur J Transl Myol. 2015;25(3):5184; doi: 10.4081/ejtm.2015. 5184.
| eISSN: | 1899-1955 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
