ORIGINAL PAPER
Could the profile of mood states predict performance in training and competition of professional goalball athletes?
More details
Hide details
1
School of Arts, Sciences and Humanities, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
2
Department of Physical Education, State University of Piaui, Picos, Brazil
3
Physical Education Postgraduate Program, Federal University of Vale do São Francisco, Petrolina, Brazil
Submission date: 2022-09-28
Acceptance date: 2023-07-11
Publication date: 2023-12-28
Hum Mov. 2023;24(4):72-79
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Purpose:
Morgan’s iceberg profile of mood states (low scores in tension, depression, anger, fatigue and confusion, and high scores in vigour) may influence skilled athletes’ performance. Aims: The present study aimed to examine in 30 professional goalball athletes whether: (1) there is an ‘iceberg mood profile’, (2) the profile of mood states predicts the motor performance, (3) the experience level (international or national) and the condition (training or competition) modulate the relationship between the profile of mood states and the motor performance.
Methods:
We used Brunel Mood Scale (BRUMS) to evaluate the profile of mood states and successful actions, errors and goals to assess motor performance. Measurements were obtained during official competition and pre-competition training with similar game rules.
Results:
Athletes demonstrated the ‘iceberg mood profile’ regardless of the experience level and contextual condition. Additionally, tension seems to be associated with motor performance during training, whereas vigour predicts successful action in competition.
Conclusions:
Iceberg mood profile characterises the profile of mood states of professional goalball athletes independent of experience level (international and national) and contextual conditions (pre-competition training and competition).
REFERENCES (34)
1.
Morgan WP, Brown DR, Raglin JS, O’Connor PJ, Ellickson KA. Psychological monitoring of overtraining and staleness. Br J Sports Med. 1987;21(3):107–114; doi: 10.1136/bjsm.21.3.107.
2.
Morgan WP. The Trait Psychology Controversy. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1980;51(1):50–76; doi: 10.1080/0270136 7.1980.10609275.
3.
Lochbaum M, Zanatta T, Kirschling D, May E. The profile of moods states and athletic performance: a meta- analysis of published studies. Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2021;11(1):50–70; doi: 10.3390/ejihpe 11010005.
4.
Raglin JS. Psychological factors in sport performance: the mental health model revisited. Sports Med. 2001; 31(12):875–90; doi: 10.2165/00007256-200131120- 00004.
5.
Beedie CJ, Terry PC, Lane AM. The profile of mood states and athletic performance: two meta-analyses. J Appl Sport Psychol. 2000;12(1):49–68; doi: 10.1080/ 10413200008404213.
6.
Leunes A, Burger J. Profile of mood states research in sport and exercise psychology: past, present, and future. J Appl Sport Psychol. 2000;12(1):5–15; doi: 10.1080/ 10413200008404210.
7.
Hall A, Terry PC. Predictive capability of pre-performance mood profiling at the 1993 World Rowing Championships, Roundnice, the Czech Republic. J Sports Sci. 1995;13:56–57.
8.
Costa KM, De Lira CAB, Penna EM, Andrade MS, Fonseca FDS, Lima-Junior D et al. State of mood, motivation, and impulsivity of young athletes: a cross-sectional study. Hum Mov. 2023;24(1):86–92; doi: 10.5114/ hm.2023.115860.
9.
Terry PC, Lane AM, Warren L. Eating attitudes, body shape perceptions and mood of elite rowers. J Sci Med Sport. 1999;2(1):67–77; doi: 10.1016/S1440-2440(99) 80185-6.
10.
Rowley AJ, Landers DM, Kyllo LB, Etnier JL. Does the iceberg profile discriminate between successful and less successful athletes? A meta-analysis. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2016;17(2):185–99; doi: 10.1123/jsep.17.2.185.
11.
Renger R. A review of the profile of mood states (POMS) in the prediction of athletic success. J Appl Sport Psychol. 1993;5(1):78–84; doi: 10.1080/1041320930841 1306.
12.
Prapavessis H. The POMS and sports performance: a review. J Appl Sport Psychol. 2000;12(1):34–48; doi: 10.1080/10413200008404212.
13.
T erry P. The Efficacy of mood state profiling with elite performers: a review and synthesis. Sport Psychol. 2016; 9(3);309–24; doi: 10.1123/tsp.9.3.309.
14.
Beedie C, Terry P, Lane A. Distinctions between emotion and mood. Cogn Emot. 2005;19(6):847–78; doi: 10.1080/02699930541000057.
15.
T erry PC, Lane AM, Fogarty GJ. Construct validity of the Profile of Mood States – adolescents for use with adults. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2003;4(2):125–39; doi: 10.1016/S1469-0292(01)00035-8.
16.
McNair DM, Lorr M, Droppleman LF. POMS Manual for the Profile of Mood States. San Diego, CA: Educational and Industrial Testing Services; 1971.
17.
Dieffenbach KD, Statler TA. More similar than different: the psychological environment of paralympic sport. J Sport Psychol Action. 2012;3(2):109–118; doi: 10.1080/ 21520704.2012.683322.
18.
Watermeyer B, Görgens T. Disability and Internalized Oppression. In: Internalized Oppression. Springer; 2013. doi: 10.1891/9780826199263.0010.
19.
Swartz L, Hunt X, Bantjes J, Hainline B, Reardon CL. Mental health symptoms and disorders in Paralympic athletes: a narrative review. Br J Sports Med. 2019; 53(12):737–740; doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2019-100731.
20.
Henriksen K, Schinke R, McCann S, Durand-Bush N, Moesch K, Parham WD et al. Athlete mental health in the Olympic/Paralympic quadrennium: a multi-societal consensus statement. Int J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2020;18(3):391–408; doi: 10.1080/1612197X.2020.17 46379.
21.
R odrigues DF, Silva A, Rosa JPP, Ruiz FS, Veríssimo AW, Winckler C et al. Profiles of mood states, depression, sleep quality, sleepiness, and anxiety of the Paralympic athletics team: a longitudinal study. Apunts Med Esport. 2017;52(195):93–101; doi: 10.1016/j.apunts.2016. 11.002.
22.
Paulsen P, French R, Sherrill C. Comparison of Mood States of College Able-Bodied and Wheelchair Basketball Players. Percept Mot Skills. 1991;73(2):396–398; doi: 10.2466/pms.1991.73.2.396.
23.
C ampbell E, Jones G. Psychological well-being in wheelchair sport participants and nonparticipants. Adapt Phys Activ Q. 1994;11(4):404–15; doi: 10.1123/apaq.11.4.404.
24.
Paulsen P, French R, Sherrill C. Comparison of Wheelchair Athletes and Nonathletes on Selected Mood States. Percept Mot Skills. 1990;71(3_suppl):1160–1162; doi: 10.2466/pms.1990.71.3f.1160.
25.
Greenwood CM, Dzewaltowski DA, French R. Selfefficacy and psychological well-being of wheelchair tennis participants and wheelchair nontennis participants. Adapt Phys Activ Q. 1990;7(1):12–21; doi: 10.1123/ apaq.7.1.12.
26.
Martin JJ, Malone LA, Hilyer JC. Personality and Mood in Women’s Paralympic Basketball Champions. J Clin Sport Psychol. 2011;5(3):197–210; doi: 10.1123/ jcsp.5.3.197.
27.
R odrigues DF, Silva A, Rosa JPP, Ruiz FS, Veríssimo AW, Winckler C et al. Sleep quality and psychobiological aspects of Brazilian Paralympic athletes in the London 2012 pre-Paralympics period. Mot Rev Educ Fis. 2015;21(2):168–176; doi: 10.1590/S1980-65742015000 200007.
28.
Fung L, Fu FH. Psychological determinants between wheelchair sport finalists and non-finalists. Int J Sport Psychol. 1995;26(4):568–579.
29.
Devonport TJ, Lane AM, Hanin YL. Emotional states of athletes prior to performance-induced injury. J Sport Sci Med. 2005;4(4):382–394.
30.
Lane AM, Thelwell RC , Lowther J, Devonport TJ. Emotional intelligence and psychological skills use among athletes. Soc Behav Pers. 2009;37(2):195–201; doi: 10.2224/sbp.2009.37.2.195.
31.
Lane AM, Terry PC. The Nature of mood: development of a conceptual model with a focus on depression. J Appl Sport Psychol. 2000;12(1):16–33; doi: 10.1080/10413 200008404211.
32.
Lane AM, Terry PC, Beedie CJ, Curry DA, Clark N. Mood and performance: test of a conceptual model with a focus on depressed mood. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2001; 2(3):157–172; doi: 10.1016/S1469-0292(01)00007-3.
33.
Peron D, Elsner VR. The influence of sex on pre-competition anxiety in wheelchair athletes. Comp Exerc Physiol. 2020;16(2):147–51; doi: 10.3920/CEP190064.
34.
Martin DT, Andersen MB, Gates W. Using Profile of Mood States (POMS) to monitor high-intensity training in cyclists: group versus case studies. Sport Psychol. 2000;14(2):138–156; doi: 10.1123/tsp.14.2.138.